@lilchicklets78 @HamillHimself Don't misunderstand, I don't condone their actions. I just don't think it's as easy to prove legally as everyone believes.
@lilchicklets78 @HamillHimself Btw, in order to get a conviction for seditious conspiracy, the government must prove that the defendant in fact conspired to use force. Simply advocating for the use of force is not the same thing and in most cases is protected as free speech under the First Amendment.
@lilchicklets78 @HamillHimself Your point was that Twitter is a private company and can therefore do what it wants. I just used an example that seems to counter it. (Private companies that were told to provide a service that they disagreed with.)
@lilchicklets78 @HamillHimself So if I own a bakery and I don't want to provide wedding cakes for same-sex couples, that's OK? If that's true then what was everyone in an uproar for?
@MsONeillScience@TeachMrReed Yesterday's events were horrible and shocking, but I don't feel that it's the same as 9/11. (Just my opinion) That said, the phrase "domestic terrorism" was definitely be brought up for discussion.
@Mustang36392426 @NevadaFootball Then you're of the opinion that they shouldn't have played the season at all then, I suppose? That bridge had already been crossed. (I do understand where you're coming from tho. May you have a blessed new year! )
@TeachMrReed Ha! I got you beat! While I am aware of that show, I know little to nothing about it bc I'm so old! Now if you want the lore of Looney Tunes, Tom and Jerry, Mr. Peabody and Sherman, or Super Chicken (world's greatest theme song!) I'm your guy! π€£
@EssexBarrister Mind you, I'm not discounting how you feel. I just think some sort of ID would eliminate a variable and make it easier for you to get through to those who refuse to see.