No. The rape of young girls happened because of YOUR racist thinking.
Those girls were targeted ... by racists ... because they were white.
Those racist rapists were only in the country because YOU brought them here.
And they were only ignored because they were brown.
Why would we ignore rapists just because they're brown? Because of YOUR fucking racism.
Believing that "people wouldn't do crimes if their basic needs were met" while also believing that "greedy rich people are stealing from everyone" never registers to the people who say this shit as inherently contradictory.
It was a lady cop? It was a rabbi coming out of PornHub headquarters? Shooter was a communist? The other cop was named Mohammed? It was in a gun free zone? Took place in Canada?
Women are the pioneers of evil because they are natural rebels. They are drawn toward desire before duty, impulse before discipline, pleasure before principle. Because they're highly sexual and sexuality rewards transgression. The forbidden is more exciting than the permitted, temptation more intoxicating than restraint. Because of this, women experience morality as their greatest enemy rather than as a guide.
The moment a society that takes women seriously stops distinguishing between good and evil, noble and corrupt, virtue and vice, it begins its own destruction. Women are the primary force behind this dissolution because they instinctively resist judgment, hierarchy, exclusion, and discrimination. They want everything accepted, everything validated, everything included, everything permitted.
But discrimination is not hatred. It is intelligence. Every functioning mind discriminates between truth and falsehood, health and poison, loyalty and betrayal. The ability to discriminate is what makes judgment possible. The inability to discriminate is not compassion; it is intellectual weakness.
When good and bad are treated as equal, as women do, the good are insulted. Every sacrifice becomes meaningless. Every act of restraint becomes foolish. Every person who chose duty over pleasure is told that his suffering was no more valuable than the indulgence of those who chose the opposite path. Evil and good are treated the same, and that is when things start to go wrong.
Goodness is expensive. Evil is pleasurable. Virtue demands sacrifice. Vice demands surrender. When a culture rewards both equally, virtue carries a double burden: it pays the cost and receives none of the respect. Eventually, people stop being good. And when everybody chooses evil, things become far worse for everyone, especially for women, who take pleasure in mocking morality while remaining unaware that morality is the very thing that keeps them safe and respected.
This is also how civilizations decay. Not because evil defeats good, but because people stop believing there is a difference between them. Once all standards are dissolved, all judgments condemned, and all hierarchies attacked, the very forces that created order lose the will to defend it.
A society survives only as long as it is willing to say that some things are better than others, some actions are nobler than others, and some ways of living are superior to others. The day it loses the courage to make those distinctions, decline becomes inevitable.
You all have to be open about what you believe and think in real life with the people around you. Don't hide it. You need to give them courage to say what they really think. They aren't as brave as you and need examples to live up to.
I really hate these types of posts because it makes men think that women's misandry is just a cutesy little 'tee hee' quirk rather than a borderline declaration of war and expression of pure hatred and desire for sadism and pain upon men. A woman like this would do it for you now, and then abuse you, divorce you, and put you behind bars when she gets bored and starts to think that you're too much of an annoyance for her.
More broadly, the problem is that for many (if not most) men, they believe one (or a combination) of the following:
a) the misandrist woman is some abstract, distant "other" woman instead of their female friends, partner, mother, sister, grandmother, daughter, aunt, etc; what underlies this feeling is a kind of grandiosity where they believe they're unique enough to not have this attitude apply to them
b) they believe they're the "exception", one of the "good ones" to whom misandry wouldn't be directed because they're le heckin "moral" (i.e. act like a doormat for women) or because they're very "hot" etc.; this bolsters their narcissism and grandiosity by the way, it makes them believe they're "unique" and "special", one of the few "chosen" ones
c) they erroneously believe that women are harmless despite women being able to utter a few words and put you in prison for many years
d) they believe that through what can only be described as "magical powers", they can fundamentally change who the woman is and will make her non-misandrist; this is relevant to the original post and is also a form of grandiosity (the hard truth is that misandry is a fundamental expression of what a woman is and something that deep is essentially unchangeable)
The root of all this is narcissism, cowardice and trying to shy away from reality. The shared feature is grandiosity, the idea that you're somehow an individual "exemption". But no, it's all women, without any exceptions whatsoever, and no you're not special, and no you won't change her.
As always in the West, men are trying to adopt individual "solutions" to a collective problem. A rude awakening is coming upon such men.
He's not competent to stand trial, he's a victim.
Society did this to him. If anything he should be paid reparations.
Who's starting the GoFundMe for this poor oppressed neurodivergent differently abled man?
This is a mental health incident, the man is clearly not fit to stand trial
I’ve also heard he was called a cracker and therefore we must see arrests for hate speech to find out if this was true.
Women in the West have *never* been collectively oppressed by men. This never happened. But feminism told women to hate men. Instead of slapping these messengers of hate in the face, women simply did as they were told and started hating men without question.
They say, "women weren't allowed to vote" but they don't explain that 1) men invented democracy and 2) men got the vote in exchange for military conscription and 3) men returning from war used their vote to vote for universal suffrage.
They say, "women weren't allowed to open bank accounts", but they don't explain that married men used to be held responsible for their wives' debts. This changed around the 1960s when banks started holding women responsible for their own debts.
They say, "women weren't allowed to drive cars" but don't explain that early cars were very hard to drive, even by muscular men, and were extremely dangerous. Men invented cars and then made cars easier and safer to drive for women as well.
They say, "women weren't allowed to have an education", but they don't explain that most men also didn't have an education and that elite women had private teachers.
They say, "women didn't get money for their work", but they don't explain that most men also didn't get money for their work because most men were farmers producing food for their families to eat.
Do you think women cared to look up these facts? Do you think women ever questioned feminism's hatred? No, they will rather accuse me of "mansplaining" and report my account for "hate speech".
Feminism is a cult of evil man haters who have twisted history in order to condemn men for crimes they never committed WHILE opening the borders to rapists and then jailing good men who instinctively want to defend their people for "racism".
If this is what the majority of women want, then I wish you good luck fighting the Russians because you'll have to do it yourself. You can die in a ditch yourself because I don't care about your stupid society. Why should I?