@JulianHoyosar Rerum Novarum addressed industrial power. Magnifica Humanitas must address algorithmic power: AI, labor, dignity and the human person before systems that optimize society.
@ReligionDigit Si Magnifica Humanitas llega a ser la Rerum Novarum del siglo XXI, entonces el punto central será este: la cuestión social ya no pasa solo por la fábrica, sino por el algoritmo. Trabajo, dignidad, dependencia digital y poder tecnológico son hoy el nuevo campo moral.
@EWTNVatican A “new humanism” in the digital age must place human dignity above algorithmic power. AI is not neutral when it shapes labor, attention, speech and dependence. Without moral governance, technology stops serving the person and begins redefining the person.
@avcanosa La IA no es solo una nueva tecnología. Es una nueva arquitectura de poder. Cuando los algoritmos gobiernan trabajo, atención, lenguaje, visibilidad y dependencia digital sin la dignidad humana como límite, el progreso deja de servir al hombre y empieza a rediseñarlo.
@EWTNVatican A Christian response to AI must address more than tools. The real issue is algorithmic power: when work, attention, speech and dependency are optimized without human dignity as the limit, automation stops serving the person and begins reshaping the person.
@EmbajadaAbierta Exactly. The risk is not AI itself, but algorithmic power without moral governance. When work, speech, attention and dependency are optimized without human dignity as the limit, automation becomes dehumanization.
@LQuinario96166 The book argues that technology is not the problem; the problem begins when human judgment is replaced by automated authority. Dignity cannot become a data point. It must remain the principle that governs the system.
Technology does not think for us: it executes what human judgment provides.
The danger begins when we govern without conscience, dignity, or responsibility.
That is where the question this book opens truly begins.
Are we delegating our humanity to code? 👇