@Wisdom_HQ The wording of your question implicates each man, and each wife, have 7 children EACH. Maybe from previous marriages. Otherwise why not say each couple?
The answer would in this case be 112.
7 men with 7 children each = 49 + the 7 men = 56.
Same thing for women, so x2 = 112.
@tobi There is misinformation in this article.
The Canadian immigration CRITERIA are not necessarily flawed, but there is a high DEMAND. The solution is very simple: Country caps. People leaving Canada do so due to financial hardships, like working at Shopify and making just $45k/year
@nkeung Thanks for highlighting this.
One could ask if the processing time alone is done on purpose. Canada needs their caregivers. Instead of bringing new ones in, keeping the ones here working as caregivers for as long as possible seems easier. The govt is aiding to the exploitation.
@kareemelassal@canadavisa_com I think it should be noted that regular CRS draws will continue to happen, and that the category-based draws will take up a portion of it.
@SeanFraserMP And those immigrants in Canada who have been contributing in other “less important” fields will now bite the bullet due to future sky high CRS draws. Thank you 👍🏻
@SeanFraserMP Question is, does the same reasoning apply to other TR/PR programs with insanely long processing times? Such as the #caregiverspilotprogram?
@AskKubeir What if the transcripts were issued, say today, but on it, it says the completion date was one week ago. Does that mean the work up until today is considered qualified?
@AskKubeir It would be extremely unfair and devastating to a lot of people if applied to people already in the country.
It’d make more sense if they set a cap on future student visas.
@StewFromHamOnt@psac_afpc I’m sorry, but this so called Union isn’t fighting for the greater good, but itself. It would be naive to think that this will lead to other positive impacts. That happens in elections. And our parties suck.
This strike won’t lead to anything good for anyone but the PSAC.
@StewFromHamOnt@psac_afpc … why? Because they’re already paid MUCH more than those in similar occupations in Europe. Yet, in Europe, people have a lot more benefits than us. 5 week vacation, longer parental leaves, tuition free universities, etc etc.
I’d rather have the money go there. Systemic change.
@StewFromHamOnt@psac_afpc You’re mentioning things that are all a guaranteed in a first world country with common sense (minus the US).
Increasing wages for public sector workers will not improve anything but their pockets…
@poutinefan@psac_afpc You mention honor for one’s country, for govt workers who make much more than the average Canadian adult, who in turn is funding the salaries of those govt workers.
Do you see the issue here?