🚨🇺🇸 CAR@LHO, QUE LAPADA! 🔥🔥🔥
CNN: “Este é um imigrante sem documentos...”
Miller: “Eles estavam aqui ILEGALMENTE?”
CNN: “Quero que esta seja uma discussão de boa-fé...”
Miller: “Quando você usa uma linguagem feita para ocultar a verdade, isso NÃO é boa-fé. Um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL é um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL. Eles não são ‘imigrantes sem documentos’.”
CNN: “Stephen, estamos tentando humanizar o debate...”
Miller: “Humanizar? Então vamos humanizar o Código Penal também. O assaltante de banco passa a ser ‘especialista em retirada sem agendamento prévio’. O estelionatário vira ‘empreendedor de narrativas financeiras alternativas’. O cara que entra na sua casa sem convite é só um ‘visitante com documentação pendente’. Que tal?”
CNN: “Isso é uma analogia grosseira.”
Miller: “Grosseira é fingir que a lei federal some porque a redação da CNN inventou um eufemismo mais fofo. ‘Sem documentos’ soa como alguém que esqueceu a carteira no Uber. Não. É alguém que cruzou a fronteira sem autorização, ficou, e agora a imprensa trata o estatuto jurídico como se fosse uma questão de estilo de escrita.”
CNN: “Mas muitos contribuem para a economia...”
Miller: “Ah, o argumento clássico: o crime deixa de ser crime se a pessoa lava prato ou constrói telhado. Pelo mesmo critério, o contrabandista de cigarro também ‘contribui’, gera emprego no transporte. Quer que a gente chame ele de ‘empreendedor logístico informal’? A CNN topa?”
CNN: “Você está polarizando.”
Miller: “Não. Eu estou recusando o dicionário de marketing. Vocês mudam a palavra, depois acusam quem usa o termo legal de ser ‘desumano’. É o truque mais velho do livro: primeiro suaviza o vocabulário, depois declara vitória moral. Os Estados Unidos já cansaram desse teatro. Chamem o que é. Ou admitam que o objetivo nunca foi clareza — foi controle da narrativa.”
For those of you who keep forgetting why the liberals keep winning elections -
Roughly half of Canada’s eligible voters either work for government (or government-funded jobs like hospitals, schools, police, post office) or rely on major ongoing government cheques — seniors on OAS, people on disability, welfare, veterans’ benefits, etc.
Public-sector workers alone are about 4.6 million people.
Seniors collecting Old Age Security are another 7.4–7.5 million.
Add disability and social assistance recipients and you quickly clear 40%+.
Then add naturalized citizens who aren’t already in those groups, and a realistic combined figure lands around 50–55% of the electorate.
These groups have a built-in reason to vote for bigger government and more spending.
That’s why the Liberals keep winning. A huge share of the people who show up to vote either work for the system or get paid by the system. The incentive is structural, not mysterious.
This is an abuse of the system.
Greed.
Fuck the Liberal party of Canada
& Fuck ALL of their supporters.
🚨 OMG. Secretary Scott Bessent just bodied the crap out of Canada!
"At war with Canada? What are they gonna do, take their 2 submarines from the Edmonton Mall and sick 'em on us!?"
😭😭
"[Carney] came to power on an anti-American, anti-Trump agenda. He was 20 points behind in the poll, and then he started this, and it's unfortunate that he's not doing what's best for the Canadian people."
"He's doing what is best for the Liberal Party, what's best for Mark Carney, and in the long run, the Canadian people are going to see through that."
Bessent doesn't miss.
Canada is being held hostage by govt workers, retired govt workers, public unions, special interest groups, and those living off handouts.
This is team elbow.
They don't care how much pain people in the private sector endure as they play politics. To them, it's just a game.
Canada had all the ingredients needed for a strong economy and a prosperous middle class to be built, but we pissed it away and built a big govt instead.
That's nobody's fault but our own.
In her latest sciolistic letter to me, @SenWarren made it clear that she knows even less about foreign exchange markets than she does about banking.
What is equally shocking, but not surprising: not a single member of the media mob has a rudimentary-enough level of financial market literacy to spot her remedial error.
To reiterate: under @POTUS, the United States delivers for America’s trusted partners.
For a fuller explanation, I recommend Senator Warren take any entry level course in international finance for her and her staff, or I can personally give her a tutorial on Foreign Exchange for Dummies. Although I am not holding my breath, I hope her next letter will demonstrate that she has learned the difference between a currency purchase and a swap or a loan.
‼️BOMBSHELL - Lutnick says Carney orchestrated the entire US/Canada trade deal collapse!!
-"We NEVER uttered the word "French" ONCE"
-I spoke to Carney TWICE in the 2 days before it collapsed
-He scuttled the deal to help the Quebec Liberal Party beat the PQ in Oct.
Cut or tariff Canada's oil exports to the US? Horrible idea.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith does a fantastic jobs breaking it down:
"I cannot think of a more disastrous policy decision than cutting off or taxing Alberta's oil to the United States."
> US will respond with a 50%–100% tariff on fuels supplied to Ontario and Quebec.
> US refineries would replace Alberta heavy crude with Venezuelan oil, cutting Canada off as a supplier permanently.
> At least 500,000 jobs would be wiped out across Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec.
> Retaliatory US cuts to gasoline and diesel exports would leave eastern Canada stranded without fuel right as fall and winter begin.
> Canada has no reserves to supply Ontario and Quebec.
> The Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) would nose-dive, devastating Canadian investments, and pensions.
What most Canadians don't seem to realize is that the current oil prices is generating substantial taxes for governments that softens the blow of the tariffs, and big portion of it comes from the US.
美国和加拿大的贸易战谈判破裂,加拿大”硬气“召回所有谈判团队。原因是川普团队要求加拿大不要和中国签署贸易协议成为美国的关税突破口,让中国产品大量倾销涌入美加墨。
卡尼突然硬气表示“加拿大是「自己家中的主人」(Masters in our own home)”, 加拿大和任何国家签署协议是资金主权,轮不到美国说三道四”
Fellow Canadians...
Just a reminder that 100% of the politicians and bureaucrats who walked away from the negotiating table with Americans and are imposing tariffs on the goods you purchase from the USA have a guaranteed income and retirement pension indexed to inflation.