Excited to announce that I have accepted the Head Football Coaching position at Island Coast High School. Let’s get to work! #GoGators#DefendTheSwamp#GatorFootball
@KEHManagement@StopWhining12@megbasham@DavidAFrench Yes we know you can’t be troubled to do the “exhausting” work of learning the truth. It’s much easier for you to parrot the lies of a felon sexual assaulter and pretend to be a Christian. Then there’s no reading necessary - and we know how hard reading is for you.
@JackJolis@MattBesq@JonahDispatch@CGasparino Standing is a constitutional requirement. You must be able to show injury. The vast majority of cases dismissed on standing also had multiple other reasons for dismissal - like lack of evidence. It’s clear you really haven’t looked in to this thoroughly.
@JackJolis@MattBesq@JonahDispatch@CGasparino Why do you assume everyone that promotes facts is against you? I’m a Conservative, and was a Republican all my life until Trump. Still have never voted for a Democrat (which is why I didn’t vote for Trump). I just believe in truth.
@JackJolis@MattBesq@JonahDispatch@CGasparino Yeah - there’s no evidence that any fraud changed the election. There was fraud in one-off cases, some that was litigated. There was no evidence of widespread fraud that could change an election. Proof:
https://t.co/eBFAu0CLcd
@JackJolis@MattBesq@JonahDispatch@CGasparino 9 different election fraud cases were decided on the merits. Republicans lost all 9. (3 in Arizona, 2 in Wisconsin and Michigan, 1 in Nevada and Georgia).
@coolbohemian@megbasham@DavidAFrench You can’t prove a negative - that’s obvious to everyone. It’s not proof of anything lol. This is kinda ridiculous reasoning.
@coolbohemian@megbasham@DavidAFrench People did go to jail - mostly from the right. Are you saying the right rigs elections? There’s no mass fraud that could change elections.
@HAnne01254673@megbasham@DavidAFrench@grok Grok is not an expert in anything lol. Circumstantial evidence is subjective, as you can tell. I see you didn’t address the fact that you claim to be a Christian while supporting Trump - probably a good idea since there is no defense to that.
@TallboiCrypto@WishIKnewBall@megbasham@DavidAFrench You’re acting like they all view originalism the same way. Gorsuch vs Kavanaugh is a good example. Both originalists in the broad sense, but often end up on opposite sides. Yet they remain consistent to their own ideologies.
@coolbohemian@megbasham@DavidAFrench An argument without evidence is just a theory. Again, no evidence provided. This has gone through the courts already - it has been PROVEN.
@TallboiCrypto@WishIKnewBall@megbasham@DavidAFrench You can’t give me cases where they didn’t apply their originalist interpretations to cases. They have ruled consistent to their judicial philosophies every time. We can disagree with those philosophies, but they are consistent with their application.
@coolbohemian@megbasham@DavidAFrench Again - zero evidence provided lol. It’s a good thing yall don’t do anything important with your lives because your lack of basic comprehension is troubling.
@TallboiCrypto@WishIKnewBall@megbasham@DavidAFrench You not understanding the law is not a good argument against it. They haven’t acted like partisans - you just don’t understand Originalism or the Court.