@StillJustBarra@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 An ovum is human. A spermatozoa is human. What else would they be? Lions? Elephants? Life doesn't start literally at conception, to make life, you need two previous living cells. Why is their fusion what defines a person? Why that stage? Why not cry for each sperm wasted?
@StillJustBarra@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 The blame may partially be on the parent. However, if you're unreasonably violent and end up unnecessarily murdering childen, then you're also to blame. An irresponsable parent might cause their child to die but you pulled the trigger and gloated about it. That makes you sick.
@StillJustBarra@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 Depending on your definition of children, anything fits your argument. You can call the apple I ate for lunch a child and then say I am a child cannibal. In the same way you call a single cell formed after conception (or a clump of them) a child, I disagree.
@StillJustBarra@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 Pro-abortion. In earlier stages of pregnancy, the fetus does not manifest sufficient qualities to warrant protection from harm, it's a non-conscient extension of the mother. "Conscious life" starts taking shape in mid-to-late stages of pregnancy where it then warrants protection.
@Dyl1111520@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 You do not kill children with bad parents. Adults should be detained if committing a crime, imprisoned or punished as the law says, not murdered on the spot. You do not murder the children of criminals either just because. Also, you're just a ISIS-like theocrat. Not good.
@StillJustBarra@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 You can protect a border without murdering children. Detain them, hold them while protecting their rights, return them to their country of origin if they do not meet sufficient criteria for further protection. You do not "just shoot em".
@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 If you're defending yourself then it's not murder, it's self-defense. If there's a plane then it's not a child, it's a plane, and it poses a credible security risk. A defenseless child does not pose a threat, you're choosing to murder it for political reasons.
@Judeo_sceptic_@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 In the same way we blow up tanks without considering whether there are children inside. Difference in this scenario is that there's no "plain", no tank, no weapon. It's an inoffensive child. You shouldn't murder children.
@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 Because you shouldn't murder children. In the same way you don't assault a child stealing candy. Or a child trespassing on private property. Or a child yelling out bad words. Just don't kill children! Having to explain this is insane.
@Jumbulo@thatdayin1992 Don't worry, we got it! It's still horrible. You seem to believe it's a lack of understanding. It's not. We get it. It's just really, really bad. Under no circumstances do you shoot "children and women too" when doing border enforcement. It's deeply unethical.
@SexoGratweeto@JoaoC_Pinto Precisamente. O modelo deles funciona bem, mas não é mágico. Os indicadores chave têm todos vindo a melhorar drasticamente. É dar tempo ao tempo.
@JoaoC_Pinto@SexoGratweeto Todos os factos que apresentaste são falsos e não substanciados. Trabalhar mais e ganhar menos p.e. Quando é que um trabalhador chinês trabalhou menos por mais na história do país?
@JoaoC_Pinto@SexoGratweeto Todas as métricas relacionadas com qualidade de vida têm vindo a aumentar. Desde salários, poder de compra, PIB, PIB per Capita, esperança média de vida, output científico e tecnológico, energia renovável. Não sei se podemos quantificar "liberdades e garantias". De que precisas?
@JoaoC_Pinto@SexoGratweeto Nos anos 60, depois de décadas de ocupação, guerra civil, múltiplas fomes, a China era o país mais pobre do mundo.
Hoje, é de longe a maior potência mundial. A imagem que pintas é de alguém que nunca visitou a China, e que deixou de se informar nos anos 2000.