The guy on the left looks really cool, wonder who he is! 😁
Get vetted, get involved, don’t just rot online. You will be better off for it, and so will our race.
Hail victory!
The GOP has never been the "party for White people". When they appeal to Whites it’s only to generate votes or cannon fodder for Zionist wars.
The GOP has fully committed itself to White replacement and can never be a party for Whites.
If it feels like the wind is in your sails in the GOP but the power structure hasn’t fundamentally changed, you’re being used by people like Podhoretz and Yazony.
@Erdreff196126@doomernat22 No, they were work camps. They weren’t nice places to live. Internment and deportation of a 5th column population makes complete sense.
October 7th was awesome and it will go down in history as a catalyzing event that led to the destruction of Israel and victory for the White race. Happy 10/7
No one thinks we need to permanently maintain a large foreign Muslim population in the West to garrison against Jews or whatever. Still, the cold reality is that these Muslims were mostly imported to weaken opposition to Jews in the Middle East and deracinate and weaken the West through nonwhite immigration. Jews use these Muslims in the West to reinforce "counterjihad" narratives that funnel support to Jewish-backed conservative parties that oppose white sovereignty, while simultaneously guiding these Muslims towards anti-white politics.
The smartest approach is coordinating against our mutual enemy when possible while simultaneously showing we are white nationalists. What Conte is doing matters because it also fights against the narrative that pro-white politics are inherently genocidal. The most genocidal political beliefs on Earth come from Jews, who push white genocide and Palestinian genocide, NOT National Socialism. Refusing to even talk to Arabs on the basis of maintaining some kind of silly cordon sanitare against talking to foreigners is stupid.
The historical examples just show that it is not some deviation to engage with reality. Reality shows that nonwhites will always come into conflict with whites in a multiracial society. Demonstrating that we do not want that outcome AND that our pro-white politics will also be 1. Not based in psychotic post-war propaganda about the inherent necessity of nonwhite genocide and 2. ultimately allow these people to have their own ethnic homelands free of Jewish terror bombing is all upside, no downside.
It takes away ZERO credibility to speak to Arabs in Arabic, and if anything, shows that the pro-white movement is actually more educated then our rivals. In contrast, dogmatically doubling down on "I will never speak to any nonwhite or support any action by a nonwhite person" just reinforces the false post-war Jewish propaganda that Hitler wanted to murder everyone who didn't have blonde hair and blue eyes.
@Watfrij@14Atheist88@ForrestWolstane George Washington freed his slaves upon his wife’s death giving them more rights than white indentured servants. He just let the scab labor run loose.
We aren’t trying to recreate a bourgeois liberal tax revolt, what we’re trying to accomplish is closer to what Mao Zedong did.
George Washington was a philosemite who didn’t care what color his workers were and freed his slaves upon his wife’s death giving them more rights than White indentured servants. He was a piece of shit
The postliberalism movement explicitly rejects our founding. Not my words, the words of their key intellectuals. Deneen argues America’s founding philosophy is defective. Adrian Vermeule argues that common good constitutionalism must abandon originalism.
Yet all the sudden in the debate for blood and soil nationalism they romanticize some made up version of John Jay and Jefferson to hammer that point home.
Which one is it? Rhetorical question.