@FlamesNation Didn’t we already do this? There is no reason to move up. The talent gap between 1 and 6 is too small to make it worth while. Use those assets to move up from 30/31 to 15-25.
@Sportsnet960@Fan960Steinberg@EricFrancis You don’t give up the assets you guys were throwing around to move up to draft a winger, especially when there is going to be potential 1st pairing defensemen available at 6. It makes zero sense.
@miketgould I think all of Carels, Reid, Smits, Rudolph and Verhoeff have top pairing upside. I don’t see Bjorck as a top line player in the NHL and certainly not a center. Bjorck has elite hockey IQ, but that is his only elite tool, everything else is very good to average.
@McMav@CofRedCentral I would take Smits ahead of Bjorck all day. I would take Smits, Carels, Verhoeff, Rudolph or Reid ahead of Bjorck. Bjorck is undersized, which isn’t a huge problem, except he is an average skater.
@miketgould@RyanNPike Aren’t they out of recalls? It would have to be an emergency recall and they have 6 healthy defense, so they wouldn’t qualify for that. I could be wrong though.
@miketgould The thing with Wyttenbach is that he plays in the ECAC which is a far weaker conference than NCHC or the Big Ten. That’s why it’s a bit disappointing that he is going back to Quinnipiac.
@FlamesNation I would rather see him stay another year, he still needs work to get stronger and faster, to really be able to hit the ground running at the pro level.
@JasonGregor@MurphysLaw74 Probably more important to remember that he isn’t very good and has a boat anchor for a contract, but sure let’s go with he doesn’t want to waive his NMC as the reason he won’t get traded.