@plymouthcc is there any chance of replying to my wife about replacing our brown bin. It's been 2 months now and no reply and yet you say no need to contact you again as you'll reply in 10 working days. We're on 40 days.
@plymouthcc is there any chance you might reply to an issue my wife logged with you on 13/04/26. The automated reply suggests we don't need to contact you again as you will contact us but we clearly do as we've heard nothing. Council tax going up but quality going down it seems.
Awful customer service from @IKEAUK. They offered me ยฃ5 for all the hassle. I paid ยฃ40 for express delivery and got slower than standard and wrong missing parts ordered.
Despite being asked to email by @IKEAUK I've not had a reply for 4 days regarding my complaint. Sofa was delivered missing covers, then wrong cover was ordered by them and it didn't end up arriving until 4 days after the express delivery date. I love @IKEAUK but feel letdown ๐ฅฒ
Here's just one video of many I took to evidence the disruption during a screening of Minecraft movie @vuecinemas in Plymouth. Absolutely ruined it for my 6 year old and his 2 cousins. Despite several complaints from myself and other parents staff did nothing.
Boys are almost 1.5x more likely to be recorded as having a special educational need as girls
Either:
Boys genuinely are more likely to have a special educational need
OR
The way we identify these needs is broken
@AdamHighcliffe I donโt know any schools that use โhigh controlโ as a term. High expectations yes as we want our students leaving school with high expectations of themselves and others this includes SEND students.
Clear routines and consistency have been proven to support SEND students most.
There are no schools in the UK that follow a โno excusesโ model. This entire argument is based on tilting at a windmill that doesnโt exist. There are lots of schools with high standards, high expectations etc. This is not the same thing, and pretending they are is an enormous disservice to the schools that work incredibly hard to keep often chaotic environments safe for children, and demonstrates a lack of familiarity with the landscape of schools.
Schools where chaotic behaviour is normal are *incredibly* bad environments for student safety, liberty, rights, mental health, wellbeingโฆ.and learning. In order to properly criticise a school it is necessary to spend time in the school. This is why Ofsted donโt write their evaluations based on what they read about a school on social media, plus a few angry letters from parents.
Iโve been to all the schools described here. Theyโre strict, but very happy environments where children tell me they enjoy it, and theyโre free from the instability of bullying, disruption etc. They also tell me how bad it used to be, how unsafe, etc. These schools are working miracles. Theyโre doing exactly what we hope they would for kids, especially disadvantaged children or children with SEN: theyโre giving them a great education is a safe environment.
And still, arguments are made against them, often ideological or theoretical in basis. I invite critics of these brilliant schools to set up their own schools, and demonstrate what they would do instead. Until then, I applaud these brilliant leaders, teachers and staff for the good that they do, because they actually make a difference in the lives of children in the real world.