jfen

[Lisa Jane Spencer @LisaJaneSpencer]

My friends and supporters have suggested a fundraiser to help cover some costs going ahead.. with my workplace being doxxed online, then getting fired, getting legal help with that, whilst also helping to support me over a time I’m without a job.

So here we are: https://t.co/G3bQmPd7Hd

Thank you so much. And thank you to those who have already sent money to my “buy me a coffee”. I very much appreciate all the support 🙏 It means more than you may know.

[Naomi Brockwell priv/acc @naomibrockwell]

There are so many more microphones in your home than you realize. Alexa is the tip of the iceberg.

Be careful what you plug in and connect to the internet.

[Signal @signalapp]

Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.

https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[ろぼいん @keita_roboin]

センシティブ判定やシャドウバンを外部サイトに飛ばずに確認できる画期的な拡張機能「Shadowban Scanner」のv2をリリースしました！

プロフィールのセンシティブ判定の検出を追加しました。ぜひインストールしてください！

Chrome・Edge：https://t.co/33XTpVLF8G
Firefox：https://t.co/jNaxV8pVYw

[Windscribe @windscribecom]

A statement from the CEO of Windscribe.

[The Figen @TheFigen_]

How do rich people break eggs so elegant. 😂

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

📱ID to access your phone…

UK iPhone users must now prove their age under a new update, or have their internet access restricted

Our message to Apple - #No2DigitalID

[Cleo Abram @cleoabram]

Jupiter’s moons are insane. One is larger than the planet Mercury. The next is the most volcanic place in the solar system. And another might have alien life. And they do crazy stuff to each other…

[Ente @enteio]

Reminder: https://t.co/OaGfdQRPjs

[Ray🫧 @ravikiran_dev7]

The biggest threat to Google's ad business isn't Meta or Apple. It's a man with a text editor who doesn't even accept donations 🤯

Meet Raymond Hill.

> Nobody knows his real face.
> Nobody knows his background.
> Goes by "gorhill" online. That's it.
> In 2014 quietly built an ad blocker. Alone.
> No team. No funding. No company. Just code.
> Called it uBlock Origin.
> Free. Open source. No strings attached.
> Every other ad blocker was taking money from advertisers.
> Letting "acceptable ads" through for a fee.
> He refused. Completely. 💀
> People tried to donate. He said no.
> Companies tried to buy him out. He said no.
> Brave offered to bring him on. He said no.
> Said accepting money in any form could compromise him.
> So he just... kept building. For free. For years.
> Grew to 40 million users across Chrome and Firefox.
> Became the most popular Firefox extension in history. 🚀
> Then Google came for him.
> Manifest V3 — a Chrome update that quietly gutted ad blockers.
> Every major ad blocker bent the knee and adapted.
> He refused. Said the new system was fundamentally inferior.
> Google removed uBlock Origin from Chrome. Entirely.
> He didn't beg. Didn't negotiate. Didn't compromise.
> Just told everyone switch to Firefox.
> Mozilla then made a mistake reviewing his extension.
> Disabled it over false claims.
> He publicly proved every claim wrong. Line by line.
> Then pulled the extension himself. On his own terms.
> Fought Google. Fought Mozilla. Both times alone.
> Still maintains the project today. Still unpaid.
> Still refuses every dollar sent his way.

> Said "It stopped being a hobby when it felt like a tedious job. So I made it mine again."

> No money. No team. No name. Just took on trillion-dollar Google and made them blink

The trillion-dollar ad empire is genuinely scared of one developer with a text editor

Absolute Legend 🗿 🔥

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

📵Social media bans are NOT working to keep children safe online around the world

This is what's really happening 🧵

[Susanne Delaney @SuzieD755164]

⚠️ WARNING: FACIAL SCANNING MANDATORY IN ALL EU VEHICLES

They say it is just "for your safety" (just like age verification is just to "keep the kids safe online") but did you know as of July 7, 2024, all newly registered cars in the EU must be fitted with specific driver-monitoring systems. By 2026 and 2027, this will apply to every single new vehicle sold on the European market (heavy trucks). If you buy a new car it will have a camera looking at your face, but it is (FOR NOW) legally barred from "recognising" you or saving that video. It is there to beep at you if you fall asleep or look at your phone. Except it isn't... as it looks like they can use this data in court against you (see below).

The EU's General Safety Regulation (GSR2) mandates two specific systems:

DDAW (Driver Drowsiness and Attention Warning): Monitors your "fatigue level" by analysing how you steer or by using cameras to watch for yawning and long eye-closures.

ADDW (Advanced Driver Distraction Warning): This is the more "advanced" part for 2026/2027. It uses cameras to track your gaze. If you look away from the road (at a phone or a passenger) for more than 6 seconds (at low speeds) or 3.5 seconds (at high speeds), the car alerts you (who will it alert in the future though? What legal punishment will you be subjected to? What penalties will you recieve? Will you be able to even start your vehicle if you break rules?

EU law (GDPR) supposedly governs how these "face-scanning" cameras work to ensure they don't become surveillance tools but do we REALLY believe we are not headed into a centralised system of global governance and mass surveillance (digital ID for "your convenience" is being rolled out across many countries as is facial recognition tech - it is in your supermarkets at the self service checkouts for example).

They claim that laws already in place (laws can be changed in the future...remember "emergency legislation" that restricted your freedom of movement?) forbids using this technology for biometric identification (facial recognition). The car "sees" a human face to track eye movement, but it is not allowed to "know" who you are (supposedly).

It is claimed a closed-loop System means your data must stay inside the car (but can be used in court remember!). The camera’s "vision" is processed in real-time by a local chip and then "immediately overwritten" (supposedly).

EU cars are "generally" prohibited from sending your video or "distraction logs" to the cloud, manufacturers, or insurance companies (supposedly).

The EU does not CURRENTLY mandate a "breathalyzer" or "kill switch for everyone" (kill switch will knock off your car and prevent you starting or driving it).

Instead, they mandate that all new cars must have a standardised interface that makes it easy for authorities to install an alcohol interlock device. So yes, authorities CAN interfere with your vehicle and movements.

Since July 2024, all new EU cars must also have an Event Data Recorder (a black box recorder). Why? If your data is yours and isn't going to be shared? They say this is purely for recording technical data (speed, braking, steering) in the seconds before a crash. This can and will be used as evidence against you.

They claim these systems are anonymous and cannot be used to identify the driver or owner; its "only legal purpose" is to help investigators understand why an accident happened (will this always be the case though?)

Now if you have read all of and think it is necessary then you are welcoming a lockstep loss of your privacy and rights. You are accepting being treated as a criminal before you ever have even committed a crime. You are accepting pre-emtive evidence gathering before you have ever committed a crime, and remember a crime could be anything in their eyes.

They make the rules, and those who swap liberty for "security" and a surveillance state [by accepting that] will regret it.

But by then it will be too late.

By Susanne Delaney

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🔔Attention: Only 5 days left to have your say on a sweeping digital ID scheme

This is your best chance to oppose plans for an intrusive, exclusionary and expensive ID system

Use our speedy tool to respond to the consultation today⤵️
https://t.co/ctwJyjP5jM

[International Cyber Digest @IntCyberDigest]

🚨🇪🇺 BREAKING: The European Commission just told all 27 member states to hurry up with rolling out online age verification, demanding deployment before the end of 2026.

Asked today how the system stops anyone bypassing it with a VPN from outside the EU, Vice-President Virkkunen said only that it is "an important part of the next steps."

[FULU @FuluFoundation]

“Age verification” is being sold as protection.
When in reality, it requires your ID to access the internet and opens the door to widespread surveillance.

What do you think age verification should be re-branded as?

[Doruwa @G_DORUWA]

Hey @grok is Honey bager the most powerful animal?
Because it's small but fearless

[Daredevil @Daredevil]

Guess who's back! Here's what you missed on #DaredevilBornAgain Season 2...

Stream a new episode tomorrow at 6PM PT only on Disney+.

[Daredevil @Daredevil]

Hell’s Kitchen isn’t ready.

Jessica Jones returns in Marvel Television’s #DaredevilBornAgain Season 2. Stream a new episode tomorrow at 6PM PT, only on Disney+.

[JumpTrailers @JumpTrailers]

4K | New look at Jessica Jones in Daredevil: Born Again Season 2