I think many AI application startups are entering the trough of disillusionment.
3 observations:
1/ Too many AI tools
Those clickbait threads about "1,000 amazing AI tools that you must try" are a bear signal.
The fact that databases with 1,000+ dedicated AI tools exist shows that the market has become too frothy.
The best AI tools that I've seen are built into existing apps with P/M fit - e.g., @superhuman, @googledocs, @NotionHQ, @coda_hq.
2/ Inflated valuations
Jasper is an AI startup that raised $125M at $1.5B valuation in October 2022.
A week ago, it cut staff to focus on helping "marketing teams at mid-size and enterprise companies."
More focus is great and I hope that Jasper can build a sustainable business. But $1.5B is an extremely difficult valuation to live up to.
Unicorn status isn't always a good thing.
3/ A bright spot - AI tools from indie makers
A bright spot is niche AI tools built by indie makers.
For example, Audiopen by @louispereira is an amazing tool for converting your raw voice transcripts into clear text. I use it every week.
These tools are growing nicely without having inflated valuations or expectations.
Follow me @petergyang if you enjoyed these observations and share your thoughts in the replies.
It'll be interesting to see how all this plays out over the next few months.
The thing about AI right now.
Is unlike other recent tech trends people are telling you we aren’t in a hype cycle.
But we are.
New technology always goes through it.
Expect people to start questioning it real soon. When they do - stay optimistic.
Somehow the “scientists” main form for rebuttal today is posting a statement from the other side, yelling that it’s obviously stupid, and expecting that’s the extent their argument needs to take.
Has Girard every addressed how other religions that exist today have addressed the same fundamental questions that Catholicism seemed to do?
For example - Jesus very much represents some of the ideals espoused in buddhism. Is that too an anti-mimetic religion. If not, why not?