JDub3

Father. Husband. Texan. Aggie. Numbers 6:24-26

[Texas A&M Aggies 👍 @12thMan]

Don't ask what if. Ask WHY NOT.

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

@propjoesays No...

[TexAgs @TexAgs]

NOT. DONE. YET.

TEXAS A&M VOLLEYBALL IS GOING TO THE CHAMPIONSHIP ‼️🏆

[Megyn Kelly @megynkelly]

I listened to the presser and feel empty inside. The motive was as suspected, so now what? Now Erika knows exactly why they stole her husband, her kids’ father. Why Charlie will never get to walk their daughter down the aisle, never have a catch with his son. The shooter will likely die by firing squad one day and should. It won’t bring Charlie back.

We lost one of our best bc some gamer left-wing trans/furry-loving loser decided Charlie was “too hateful.” The L told him it was so, and he believed it. Or maybe he just listened to CK videos on trans issues and decided for himself, based on his own Left-wing ideology, reinforced by woke liars all over the news, that it was hateful to say this is a sickness … that you can’t change genders … that it’s evil to cut off healthy body parts of children and to sterilize minors.

Either way, the media won’t stop. They’re complicit in the lies that rotted this shooter’s brain. And the six trans mass shooters before this. But they’ll never acknowledge it. It’s too important to them to virtue signal and be on the side of the allegedly powerless oppressed. Murders of children, of Charlie, be damned.

The side of sanity has no choice but to forge on without these lunatics. Grow our ranks. Donate to TPUSA. Get more children educated with truth and common sense and biological reality. Parents need to get their children off the damn laptop/internet for hours on end and actively intervene when obsessive gaming/reddit surfing becomes a problem. This shooter’s parents may have turned in their son but they sure did know right away that their kid was the culprit. They took one look at those photos and knew. What had already happened to him that made their minds go there? What signs were ignored or overlooked? Maybe we can get the next set of parents to do better. Be more engaged. To protect us all.

Realistically, it’s up to us to raise our kids well and that means with a strong moral core, a strong connection to us and a strong connection to their faith. Then we must multiply our ranks by making K-12 and colleges our NUMBER ONE PRIORITY for de-programming sick and pernicious leftist ideology. What makes parents stay silent in the face of insane woke abusive schools? Junior needs to get into Harvard? Don’t piss off the administrators whose recommendation you need? They’ll make him into a full communist. And maybe a killer.

FIGHT. Fight the lies that are being told. Fight for a return to wellness practices - off the constant gaming/discord and onto a field, e.g. Do NOT remain silent when they actively try to infect your child with the woke mind virus that could cost your child or someone else’s their life one day.

Above all we must continue to spread Charlie’s message of faith, freedom, family and patriotism. We must become even more effective at it and more ubiquitous in our reach. We must say it, say it all, and say it again. And we must do it from fortified spaces so we can live.

[David Medina 🌲🇺🇸 @davidmedinapdx]

🚨 EVERY SECOND of this 7 minute clip from this church in Oregon is worth listening to.

If your pastor doesn’t sound like this today or they danced around what happened this week with the assassination of Charlie Kirk, it’s time to find a new pastor who will stand boldly like Pastor Tom of People’s Church in Salem, Oregon did here.

I’ve never been more proud of the church I grew up in. If you’re in the Salem area and are looking for a church that is filled with the Spirit, look no further.

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

Did.... did we break the curse?
#GigEm

[Ted Cruz @tedcruz]

ELECTRIC win tonight by the Aggies!

One of the best games I have ever watched.

[Little League @LittleLeague]

Texas East’s Lamar LL will represent the Southwest in Williamsport! #LLWS

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

@ScottPresler Thank you, Scott! You're a true patriot.

[TexAgs @TexAgs]

⚫️ STATEMENT ⚫️

#GigEm

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

@derekahunter @AceofSpadesHQ He is running...for his fourth term.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive.

President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.)

I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric.

Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.

How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?

NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.

PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan.

The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.

This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.

Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff).

Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored.

Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership.

The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up.

Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up.

This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it.

It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not.

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes.

Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.

I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.

The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.

[Rich Baris THE PEOPLE'S PUNDIT @Peoples_Pundit]

Folks, notice the operative word here is "select", not "elect".

But please, lecture us all about democracy some more.

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

@mattlanza We have it and it never failed!

[TexAgs @TexAgs]

BREAKING: Michael Earley is set to be hired as the next head coach of Texas A&M baseball ⚾️👍 https://t.co/qWF9Cnz8uc

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

Happy Friday! God's work is a beautiful thing. #Denali #30%

[L A R R Y @LarryOConnor]

God said to Noah, “This is the sign of the covenant that I have established between me and all flesh that is on the earth.”

Happy June.

[Troy Nehls @SheriffTNehls]

REMEMBER THE ALAMO.

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

Super Tuesday in the books!

[Sarah Fields @SarahisCensored]

The “He Gets Us” campaign being pushed during the Superbowl is a lie. In the campaign ad, it says that “Jesus disagreed with those He loved”. To this I say no, He is God. He doesn’t “disagree”. He speaks the truth and He rebukes the lie. By using the word “disagree”, the campaign implies that either party could be correct. Their website also encourages “inclusiveness” regardless of ideology, identities, sexuality and religion.

This is progressive Christianity. And as a believer who loves God and the truth, I don’t want their watered down nonsense. God’s word is very clear regarding how to be saved and what you are commanded to do after salvation. And yes, you do have to be saved. You cannot get to heaven by “being a good person”. Our job is to call out the evil, expose it, and teach the truth to all who will hear. God’s children better be ready… we have a hard battle ahead.

[JDub3 @JackEthe3rd]

Better late than never!

[Greg Abbott @GregAbbott_TX]

My statement on Texas’ constitutional right to self-defense.