Jack Newby

newbs muse

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@Tjernlund @pe_nng International law is innately political but wields equally relevant and discernible legal characteristics. The notion that ‘it doesn’t exist’ stems from an Augustinian argument on the enforceability of law, it is archaic as it is untrue

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@Joelbirmz12 chinese on the train is the most selfless act known to mankind

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@christiancalgie well this is ironic

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@mrhenrymorris bit snobby

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@delaFeriaR ‘To tax and to please, no more than to love and to be wise, is not given to men [and women]’ who knew tax could also be poetry ?!

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@mrjamesob the preamble to this piece is clearly sensationalised for the purpose of engaging the typical spiked reader, and yet I cannot help but feel somewhat moved by the essence of its argument re. your book. I wonder if you have a response to it ?

[Christopher Snowdon @cjsnowdon]

The derangement of James O'Brien https://t.co/sjeenIPHfy

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

and live

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@GuidoFawkes good riddance

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@theJeremyVine @MikeyCycling The last modicum of respect I held for you Jeremy has eviscerated. How are you condoning the actions of a man who spends his spare time criminalising people ? The Londoners reaction is not graceful and in fact its an affront to me, but that’s not the travesty here.

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@cdjp09 @lukerobertblack no

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@delaFeriaR @OBR_UK Nice one Rita !

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@AndreasKoureas_ referring to yourself as an intellectual should be criminalised

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@christiancalgie @JMPSimor i remember arguments like this back in primary

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@christiancalgie and he’s a scouser

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@christiancalgie @chriscurtis94 he must put aside his principles though… the question being, at what cost ?

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@paul_winginit @jfwduffield Not sure about this, look at how the bill of rights bear striking similarities - 1689 in gb then 1789 in US. Whilst differences are manifold, the polities do share substantial societal components

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@DrProudman this is the biggest false equivalency i’ve ever seen

[Jack Newby @JackNewby3]

@guyverhofstadt ur a sadist mate, and it’s ppl like u that create obstacles to sthn like this ever happening - the brexiteers dont like ya, and for gd reason !!