Jackyy

No financial advice

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

Everyone arguing about price but the roadmap literally shows where this is heading
Reactive isn’t building another L1 they’re building the coordination layer for the entire multi chain world
If they execute this the whole space will need $REACT

[Reactive Network @0xReactive]

We're solving the coordination crisis!

Unlike many solutions which require specific integrations and are limited to predefined use cases, Reactive Network can execute arbitrary EVM logic, unlocking a vast array of on-chain utilities and bringing a fragmented Web3 ecosystem back together.

No more constraints. Build anything, anywhere, across chains.

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@nilesh_rohilla Company valuation and token valuation are two different things
Numerai raising at a 500M valuation doesn’t mean NMR has to match it
NMR isn’t equity and its price comes from staking demand and ecosystem growth
It’s bullish news but it doesn’t guarantee a 300 percent pump

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

The last $REACT run was just the warm-up.
If this Ethereum connection hits, the next move could make the last rally look small 👀🔥

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@timmyxdc That’s not wrong but it’s not the full picture either. Wong Kai explained the increase mostly comes from market makers needing more supply because trading volumes have been climbing fast that’s how liquidity scales before a big expansion

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@abishaieth Most projects hand tokens to VCs and market makers for free $REACT makes them buy it that’s real demand and exactly what a fair launch should look like

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@PalmersCove They said not much pumping left when MMs asked for more $ETH in 2017 too then liquidity exploded and so did price liquidity expansion always comes before major moves $REACT

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@PalmersCove You’re mixing up supply distribution with selling no VC unlocks no team dump just MMs increasing liquidity pools so spreads stay tight that’s what a growing network looks like $REACT

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@abishaieth Good point but to clarify.
When market makers request more tokens it’s not about retail demand right now it’s about liquidity depth

Even if buyer demand is low MMs still need inventory to manage spreads and prepare for upcoming volatility istings or integration volume

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@0xReactive If $ETH is getting smarter with Pectra, and Reactives making it reactive, we might be seeing the next big shift in EVM automation.
Any hints if your “Ethereum news” connects to that $React

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@20KREAM22 Could be the first time smart contracts actually react to events in real time that's where $REACT could explode

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@20KREAM22 Pectras all about faster, smarter contracts
Reactive Network’s been talking about filling Ethereum’s reactivity gap
If $ETH news in Dec ties in with $REACT event driven layer that’s not just bullish it’s a real infrastructure play

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@reactive_net @0xReactive

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@RongKaiPARSIQ This is exactly what sets Reactive network apart not competing with other L1s but empowering all of them true interoperability through RSCs is the future every blockchain will eventually need what Reactive just built an execution layer that makes them smarter Evolution in motion

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@DrProfitCrypto True he sounded hawkish on inflation but the weak jobs data + risk management cut are still bullish for crypto longer term short term chop but medium trrm outlook looks good

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@WatcherGuru That’s good for crypto

ReasonA weaker job market makes the Fed more likely to cut rates or keep policy loose

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@alxslitb @UnknowTraderAi @grok That statement from Powell is generally bearish for market

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@DarrellFowler13 @DoubleShotDips Burns / Reductions tokens were permanently removed from circulation burned that’s bullish because it reduces supply $react

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@JonDragonJon The point of #M87 P2P is to stop chart dumps and give traders control.Contract taxes are coded by the token itself no platform can bypass that but $m87 P2P still means no slippage and no damage to price action

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@JonDragonJon The point of P2P isnt that all fees disappear its that you avoid slippage protect the chart and cut out middlemen If a token like $EVA has its own contract tax youd pay that anywhere uniswap pancake #M87 just makes sure whales can trade without wrecking the chart or other holders

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@JonDragonJon That 10% fee isn’t an #M87 scam. Many tokens have hidden taxes coded into their contracts ($EVA included). The DEX estimated 1% swap fee, but the token itself takes an additional cut. That’s a token-level issue, not an M87 rug. Happens on Uniswap too if you trade taxed tokens.

[Jackyy @JacksonG44304]

@JonDragonJon Why It’s Not #M87 Fault

1. DEX ≠ centralized exchange

In P2P or DEX models, the fees are often set by liquidity providers or smart contract parameters of the traded token itself (like $EVA), not M87