‼️MUST WATCH: RARE Drone Footage They DESPERATELY Tried To Bury—Aerial Video Of UVU Crime Scene BEFORE They Paved It Over! 👀
This is the footage they didn’t want you to see. Shortly after Charlie Kirk was assassinated at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, a drone captured the deserted quad while the campus was still under a hasty evacuation.
What the footage reveals:
The Kill Zone: The camera focuses directly on the pop-up canopy/tent where Charlie was sitting when he was shot in the neck.
Eerie, post-apocalyptic views of a deserted campus with trash and debris still scattered on the steps surrounding the stage.
The drone pans from the crime scene over to the roof of the Losee Center, approximately 142 yards away to the alleged snipers perch, where they claim the assassin was positioned.
This video was taken before the investigation concluded, before the tent was removed, and long before they moved to pave over the location.
While UVU campus police reportedly failed to deploy their own drones to monitor rooftops that day, this independent footage captures the raw reality of the security failure that left Charlie exposed.
Watch the full clip below to see the site before it was "cleaned up" forever. 👇
⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 https://t.co/zvJN5mIZ6X 💪
CC: @RealCandaceO@baroncoleman
Trump on Iran War:
Reporter: What extent are Americans’ financial situation motivating you to make a deal?
Trump: Not even a little bit. I don't think about Americans’ financial situation
Terrifying dashcam footage captured inside the tunnel beneath the Bridge Apartments in Washington Heights shows a driver narrowly avoiding disaster as huge chunks of debris crash onto his vehicle near the entrance to the George Washington Bridge.
I’ll explain it again… Trump has been a Kremlin asset for many years. He wasn’t compromised over “Miss Russia” contestants, but over something far more serious — something that in many U.S. states could lead straight to the electric chair.
Yesterday, the CIA released a report stating that Russia helped him win his first election. Remember when things got heated and the Kremlin urgently recalled its ambassador, fearing arrest? That’s why.
For the second election, far more resources were deployed. Musk, already prepared, was pushed to buy Twitter and indirectly acquire a number of media outlets using Russian money. The financial trails allegedly run through Kuwait, which has long-standing ties to money laundering connected to Gazprom. Russia is said to have provided Trump’s campaign with extensive tools and strategies for campaigning and influencing the vote.
Back in 2018, Russia decided to make broader use of Trump’s presidential powers and move toward a global redistribution of influence.
At the Helsinki summit, Putin reportedly proposed that the U.S. allow the restoration of a “greater Russia” as a counterweight to China. The U.S., according to this version, agreed. It is even suggested that Trump was pressured into signing a document placing Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, and Armenia within Russia’s sphere of influence, while Sweden and Finland would join NATO, Russia would leave Syria, and the U.S. would withdraw from Afghanistan.
This, it is argued, explains why Trump looked pale after the meeting — as if he had just realized the scale of what had happened.
After returning to the U.S., discussions among top officials from both parties allegedly concluded that such an arrangement aligned with American interests and should be upheld — likened by some to a modern version of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.
Following the change of administration, at the Geneva meeting in June 2021, President Biden is said to have reaffirmed certain commitments, while insisting on a peaceful path to territorial changes.
From there, events accelerated: the U.S. withdrew from Afghanistan in August, and preparations began to shape public opinion in northern Europe toward NATO membership.
Russia’s expectations that Zelensky’s rise to power would quickly resolve the “Ukrainian question” did not materialize. As he grew more assertive, it became clear to Moscow that a rapid outcome would only be possible through military means.
According to this narrative, Democrats did not anticipate the level of Ukrainian resistance and could not risk being seen as complicit in another genocide. They delayed, assessed risks, and sought to stabilize the situation. Their concern was not only nuclear escalation, but also the potential exposure of alleged agreements. Putin’s repeated claims of being “deceived” increased pressure, and in this interpretation, contributed to internal political shifts in Washington.
Trump, it is argued, understands the leverage the Kremlin holds over him and cannot escape it. He will do everything possible to shape a deal acceptable to Moscow. Hopes that he might reverse course are seen as unrealistic.
From this perspective, Europe is beginning to grasp the risks of Ukraine’s potential fall and may be forced to take on a leading role in defending the democratic world. This is portrayed not as optional, but necessary — otherwise Europe itself could be torn apart from multiple directions.
And as for Ukraine — the belief remains: it will endure and defend its independence.