Socialists love to redefine not helping someone as harming them.
If you don't give them your money, you "stole" from them.
If you don't provide aid, you "killed" them.
If you don't sacrifice for their cause, you're responsible for every bad outcome that follows.
The premise is that other people's lives, labor, and resources already belong to those who need them.
One group is expected to produce.
The other is entitled to receive.
The productive are judged by what they contribute.
The dependent by what they need.
Once you accept that premise, refusing a demand becomes aggression and self-interest becomes cruelty.
It's the creed of the parasite.
"If this country is going to allow one man to be worth $1 trillion..."
Allow?
What are you, his fucking owner?
A trillion dollars doesn't come from your permission. It comes from millions of voluntary decisions by investors, customers, employees, and business partners.
And "fair share" always means the same thing:
Someone else should produce so I can live off them.
The socialist definition of fairness is that the more productive you are, the less belongs to you.
They're not opposed to exploitation.
They're opposed to being expected to produce.
They're not opposed to slavery.
They just think the productive should be the slaves.
So like if it was 20 votes, I’d understand. There’s going to be a reasonable margin of error.
But it’s 18,000 votes, all for Spencer Pratt that have been rejected. That’s not an accident.
It’s treason.
Committed by the people who want to “defend democracy” whatever that means.
"You hate socialism because you want people to starve."
No. You support socialism because you mistake good intentions for good outcomes. History has been paying the price for that confusion for over a century.
In a godless society, more and more people will see good things as evil — and evil things as good.
There is no reality in which stabbing a kid in the heart over a minor altercation is self-defense. And yet…