Pro-SAF talking point: calling for intl protection is pro RSF/TQM
But if the RSF is responsible for the protection concerns and TQM is aligned to RSF, then how can it be a TQM position to call for intl protection forces to protect civilians from the RSF?
The math ain't mathing.
6.
This is the only scenario where Hamdok, the UAE (and others in the region), and the US win while maintaining a "for the people" facade. Wouldn't surprise me if they'd already made this deal.
5.
SAF leadership and RSF in its entirety are criminals to me and the last thing I want to do is defend a take of theirs. But it does make sense considering the IR reality, and it would be shortsighted to dismiss this possible scenario out of hand.