I will be appealing this flawed ruling by a Clinton-appointed Massachusetts judge.
Texas has every right to enforce its own laws to protect our citizens, and we will continue to fight to hold ActBlue accountable.
When politicians say they want to seize/tax "wealth" but actually mean "shares in your own company that you yourself founded", the real point is making it impossible for anyone to actually control their own company for more than a decade.
They won't let you stay, either.
🧵 Here is the TRUTH: Dangerous gain-of-function research was funded by the U.S. government around the world, directed and approved by people like Dr Fauci. @DNIGabbard exposed that yesterday.
Using U.S. government data, put together and uncovered by career subject matter experts in the Intelligence Community and other government agencies, yesterday’s release highlighted one example of the many overseas biolabs funded by the U.S., the research conducted there, and the significant risks they pose to the world, especially when located in a country at war.
🔗 https://t.co/qL5em30hoF
THEY SAID IT WAS A CONSPIRACY THEORY. 🚨
Now DNI Tulsi Gabbard says U.S.-funded biolabs existed, dangerous pathogen research was taking place, and Americans were repeatedly misled about it.
@JackPosobiec calls it a “receipt bomb” that changes everything.
🚨BREAKING — New documents obtained by AFL reveal Biden’s DOJ weaponized federal law enforcement against parents at school board meetings despite warnings from FBI officials and the National Sheriffs’ Association.
Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.
In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted.
https://t.co/pLMD0krc69
@Tylermi65942082@RyderAnalytics@On3@PeteNakos@grok I guess we'll find out, odds are Big 12 isn't going to do a thing because they know they have no legal basic upon which to sanction Tech. If they do we can revisit once the suit is settled.
@ShonenVentures@DelusionalHokie@RyderAnalytics@On3@PeteNakos@grok I guess Sorsby and Tech should have just kept it all under wraps and that would make it all ok? Tech wouldn't even be considering playing him if a judge hadn't granted him relief and said he is eligible to play -which is what any other school would have done in this situation.
With the amount of money they would extract from such stupidity they may never need to make another dime. Hilarious you are so up in arms over a player who no one has even said would play, you should be mad at the NCAA who's lawyers are so retarded they couldn't prove before a court of law that they had evenly or fairly applied their own rules despite the player in question admitting to breaking said rules.
You are right I misspoke there, it was football players wagering on their own schools other sports. About a half degree removed from Sorsby but an important distinction none the less. But again what if their teammates on the other sports were letting them in on throwing games? Gambling even in proximity is about as bad but never saw any outrage at the UT Football player still suiting up.
@Tylermi65942082@RyderAnalytics@On3@PeteNakos@grok You're going to find out real quick that is not the case. There's a reason the Big10 backed down from their idea of making a wide spread conference mandate not to schedule Texas Tech.
Any attempt to rationally agree with you is moving to goal posts apparently. Nothing has moved, this entire argument about "doing the right thing" is profoundly stupid when we are dealing with a complex legal situation. Texas Tech is obviously not going to be bullied into submission by outrage culture for following guidelines and that seems to deeply bother you.
Obtuse would be pretending this is as simple as “he broke rules, cut him.” No one is arguing he didn’t violate NCAA rules. The point is that his diagnosed gambling addiction/mental-health evidence is part of the court record, and a judge found he could suffer irreparable harm if barred from playing. Schools routinely keep athletes after rule violations and suspensions, including sports-wagering issues. Could you argue Sorsby’s situation is more egregious than prior examples? Of course. But that still does not make “just cut him” the obvious, risk-free answer.
Texas Tech isn’t being forced to roster him, but they are in a legal, NIL, compliance, and student-welfare mess where every path carries risk. Your feelings about whether the injunction is right or wrong don’t erase that nuance.
@AshJWilliams3@JarheadFrog Look you could certainly make that argument, but all that would be considered upon actual trial and we are premature in regards to that.
"Doing the right thing" since when has practically any school involved in college sports done the right thing? If collectively they did sports wouldn't have devolved to this point because players would be so scared shitless of actual consequences they would never dare. Looks like we can at least agree on that and the fact that what Sorsby did was definitely wrong.