@hutchinson So planter is messier than George Santos? Than Donald Trump? You wouldn't have some ulterior motive with trying to name associated the two would you?.. you're a gross scumbag
@NateSilver538 Well when there is actual rampant corruption going on. The disqualification for a job isn't what tattoo you once had or if you were a bad boyfriend. The article does a lot of alluding but no concluding.
@barbarikon It does seem odd to me that now everyone on Twitter is best friends with her and knew about him but have all been so so quiet but this part of his life. All the focus on a tattoo.
@emzanotti If you are going to be cute "I'm not going to confirm or deny anything but this is my friend and we all know. Hehehe." Come out and say full throated what you know he did. And if the record shows you are correct accept the praise and if you're not accept the punishment.
@emzanotti I'm not a constitutional scholar, I don't believe a terrible ex boyfriend disqualifies someone from the Senate. You know the parties involved. Don't be a coward now. Don't hide behind "read the article" or "allegedly". Tell us what he did. full stop.
@hutchinson Your use of "if" and "did" are doing a lot of heavy lifting. Stop being a coward and just say you don't care if he did it or not you want to believe he did it, so in your eyes he did it.
@Prominent_Bryan@ScottMa10112818 "welfare" recipient as you are say makes little or no money & would pay little in terms of income tax. A senior making 180k definitely pays or has paid a substantial amount of income tax. You have to be a real POS to think the govt giving someone back their own money is welfare
@Prominent_Bryan A real conservative would say if these seniors were successful enough to make 180k why should they not qualify for it. Why are you punishing success? Besides they're obviously good with money. So give it to them and the trickle down economics benefits everyone.
@WayneMathison@globeandmail Conservative think tank releases opt ed "we should cut seniors benefits." This thread: 'How dare Carney and the liberals...."
@WScafemirror@uh_who_are_you Not according to the Pilt act. If you say ownership is not sovereignty but the province of Alberta cannot force the federal government to property taxes on its federal property, how can you really say it's not sovereign. Enforcing taxation is like sovereignty 101.
@TacoCanada47@vanccanadian@PierrePoilievre I had a whole other response prepared when I thought you were just doing some stupid ideological mental gymnastics. After reading your profile, I realized. You may or may not be stupid, but you are definitely poor.