@sidgandhi_xyz The second step is to tie the output to some form of identity/reputation (since people can always lie about the x) - this of course is a slippery slope with the tradeoff on privacy.
@sidgandhi_xyz I like the way you think about this stuff Sid. IMO the first step will be in defining Generally Accepted Algorithms to create an index of known/trusted f(x). Then upon presenting the proof you can include a refrence to the index. Kind of like a multi-hash.
I should own this tweet @lensprotocol#digitalroots sig:0x28cd327a8a223b70b9b967f127089da108865af791f32cf494cbb8f8be608b07526dd5c433207042486a088e6015dc6b87d355c5117d93669f4df0295e718b151b https://t.co/lNBktlyZN1
I should own this tweet @lensprotocol#digitalroots sig:0x28cd327a8a223b70b9b967f127089da108865af791f32cf494cbb8f8be608b07526dd5c433207042486a088e6015dc6b87d355c5117d93669f4df0295e718b151b https://t.co/lNBktlyZN1