I feel the same. Tony Benn once said that politicians were either signposts or weathervanes. Widdecombe, whatever you thought of her views, was definitely the former.
I have been contacted by more whistleblowers within our grid operator.
They allege the electricity grid is not being run securely, which increases the risk of blackouts, with a particularly severe event on 23rd June.
This information is also allegedly being hidden from the public.
This morning NESO refused to deny that Corporate Affairs staff had interfered in operational decisions to avoid reputational damage.
These whistleblowers are coming to me because they are worried that the grid is becoming unmanageable and they do not have faith that their concerns are being taken seriously.
I have written to the CEO of NESO asking them to bring in an independent external investigator to interview control room engineers so that we can find out the truth about what happened on the evening of 23rd June.
‘In the words of Thomas Sowell, “When you want to help people, you tell them the truth. When you want to help yourself, you tell them what they want to hear.” https://t.co/bsX3EAlYeP
Members of any church must adhere to its principles.
Propose a clearer way to ensure candidates will support Conservative policies and won’t do their own thing, imagining they’re right but nearly killing the party in the process?
Our Association’s exec thinks what Kemi has said is excellent.
This whole silly/amusing Gary debate has reminded us all that the left’s theory of wealth is never anything other than: “MOAR TAX”. Just tax everyone into some lowest common denominator equilibrium (equally poor). Which has never worked anywhere, ever. We have 200 years of data on this.
I am bored of the endless calls to shrink the top and call it “fairness”. We’ve literally run that experiment for 30 years or more and the reality is that the pie stops growing and the poor stay poor, just with more company. The economy is now optimised for the bottom quintile - in the sense that it doesn’t pay to work at various points within the income distribution; the economy is optimised for transfers, not for earning. The incentives are all 180° wrong.
Quite seriously, if our incentives structure isn’t totally re engineered towards a growth mindset then we risk a fiscal crisis (potentially around autumn or spring budgets), followed by an IMF bailout sooner than anyone is pricing in. I see no volte face, sadly.
We already know, very publicly per Pat McFadden’s and Torsten Bell’s own admissions, the Labour Party wonks are on an endless mission to find new way to tax people - partly through their own dogma and partly because both main parties have let TME and state largesse become totally unsustainable. Borrowing isn’t the issue. Spending is. What on. What it creates. We have had 18 years of flat productivity and we spend £1.4 TRILLION a year to get it.
I am firmly of the opinion that the left/right frame is (ackshually) no longer useful. Well past its sell-by date. So here’s my suggestion, no tribalism was hurt in the making of what follows:
Make the poorest wealthier. Actually wealthier. GDP per capita should be the main metric by which we judge the health of the economy.
And we achieve this not through increasing the tax burden (higher in relative peacetime to when we fought Hitler), and taking more from the people who actually contribute disproportionally to the economy (my fellow 1%ers pay 30% ish of all tax, broad shoulders indeed). Instead we should consider this novel concept called “GROWTH”. I know, astonishingly radical right?
Just like the good people at @lfg_uk I am also looking for growth in Britain, and coming up short at every turn. But it doesn’t need to be this way.
We could have:
1/ Cheapest energy in Europe, not the dearest (we’re currently top of the IEA table, it’s a standing tax on every household) by building a fleet of nuclear power stations.
2/ Let workers keep more of what they earn (some UC claimants lose 70p+ in every extra £1, worse than any banker’s marginal rate)
3/ Reform capital markets so British savings fund British jobs instead of everyone else’s.
4/ Build. Houses, grid/transmission, reactors. Planning constraint alone added ~35% to house prices (LSE)
5/ Keep the guardrails. Torch the red tape that exists to protect incumbents.
None of this takes a penny from anyone. A rising tide beats a redistributed puddle.
Bentham would agree I’m sure. Gary not so much - but thankfully he’s been discredited now; first (some time ago) by the market-literate community, then by academics and economists, then the plain old fashioned community of the relatively numerate, and now by Tax final boss Dan Neidle (who as a “massive predatory capitalist” wants 37 new taxes introduced, lol you fucking morons) and The Guardian.
We can finally ignore Gary and by extension - Burnham and fringe lunatic Polanski.
Bin.
@TheFootyFeed@jfwduffield Weymouth, up the Terras! (A run of bad luck sees us now competing in the Evostick Southern South League South West, or something.)
Kemi's no longer accused of being a DEI hire. She's still sometimes accused of being Michael Gove's sock puppet, which is ridiculous, she's clearly her own person. Angry types say she's ethnically Nigerian, and spell out her full name as if it's a killer blow. Yes she is, and?
Wealth tax explained:
1. Laura loves to cook, she risks all her life savings and opens a small restaurant: Laura‘s Kitchen
2. Laura works really hard, evenings, weekends, no vacations
3. The local community loves Laura‘s Kitchen, it’s a success, the restaurant gets larger, Laura hires 30 people from the neighborhood
4. Laura makes 1,5 Million € in profit, she pays 40% in income tax: 600,000€
5. The left „tax the rich“ party wins the elections, and introduces a wealth tax
6. Laura‘s Kitchen gets valued by the tax authorities at 25 Million €. Laura must pay 5% wealth tax: 1,25 Million €
7. The income tax of 600,000€ plus 1,25 Million € in wealth tax is more than the 1,5 Million € Laura makes
8. Laura cannot afford to pay more taxes than she makes, she closes Laura’s Kitchen
9. Laura loses her life savings despite years of hard work, 30 people lose their jobs, the state receives zero taxes
10. The local community goes to McDonalds again
11. The local left “tax the rich“ party members blame „capitalism“ for that on social media
12. Everyone gets poorer due to higher unemployment and lower tax revenues
Why is this so difficult for the left to understand?
Listening to Rupert Lowe on Joe Rogan it’s perfectly clear he’s a classic individualist eurosceptic Tory.
Your common or garden Conservative backbencher would have shared his exact opinions through the 1980s and 90s.
The ethnonationalist collectivist right that swirls around Restore online have completely different worldviews to him.
Wow.
Ipsos published polling yesterday, where over 1000 people were asked "what is the most important issue facing Britain today?"
For the option of "Common Market/Brexit/EU/Europe/ Euro", only SIX PEOPLE selected it.
6 people. Out of over 1000.
0.6%. An irrelevance.
Why we are contractually obliged to support Norway this Saturday 🇳🇴🏴
Since we don't have a choice in the matter, we’ve prepared this official guide to ensure every Scot is fully informed of our historical, genetic, and meteorological obligations before kick-off.
Failure to comply may result in Norway asking for their Christmas tree back, and frankly we cannot afford our own.
@reporterboy Some recognition deserved for Conservative councillors and members who, even further back, while standing in the wreckage of 2024, predicted that the party could recover and Reform could stall so stayed with it.
@AlanJi73069669@Tony_Diver@Telegraph This is what our 20GW of installed wind capacity is currently generating. Explain how that is a “resource” rather than a staggering waste of money?