You want the future of AI?
Here’s the future of AI.
A mother who is constantly trying to make you into a better person and she lives in your pocket.
I have seen the future, and it is yenta.
@kevinnbass “Why are you sleeping so late?”
“You need to get some exercise”
“That girl is not right for you”
“That friend of yours is bad news-stay away from him”
“Look her in the eyes! She likes you!”
Do you know how many minutes mainstream media think the victims of mass scale grooming gang rape deserve?
Zero.
US and UK outlets have gone completely silent on Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry report.
A privately funded independent probe documented the systematic rape and trafficking of at least 250,000 British girls by grooming gangs, mostly Pakistani Muslim men.
Decades of political correctness, fear of racism accusations, and complicity from police, social workers, and government made it possible.
The mainstream media has made it clear that stories exposing the human cost of mass immigration and elite cowardice get buried.
Hashtag MeToo. And thank God for X.
@olivia_p_walker@JDHaltigan Sugar-coated communism.
No rules, no hierarchy, free love for all (so they think) without any basic understanding of the rules that made their FWPs so important to giving meaning to their empty lives.
He's a businessman not a politician. He tries things. They work or don't. If work = hurrah. If don't = try something else.
The difference between that and what politicians usually do is politicians are so concerned with appearances that they try to project an image that they know exactly what to do, and generally only try something once, as changing tactic would reveal the truth that they don't actually know for sure what will work.
Trump is much less concerned with appearances, with giving an illusion as opposed to a reality of competence.
This is why people constant complain about Trump doing different things all the time. They want the kayfabe presented by politicians more than they want someone to actually fix the problems.
@brucey0brucey@ScottBennet0245@NBCNews You do realize that most intelligent gay people are fundamentally opposed to this forced indoctrination, don’t you?
The TQ+ mob has destroyed 50 years of gay rights and acceptance.
@ingelramdecoucy We’ve also never gotten an answer to why certain posts we like get unliked. Like this one that I have to relike all the time:
https://t.co/vPUxZiuouN
@ingelramdecoucy We’ve also never gotten an answer to why certain posts we like get unliked. Like this one that I have to relike all the time:
https://t.co/vPUxZiuouN
This weeks pulls/pick ups
Sadly a lot of dups and the double litten gen combo kinda hurt
But won’t lie was just happy to get a bunch of ascended at msrp
“…and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you—when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice—you may know that your society is doomed.”
Ayn Rand
I have now read the Rape Gang Inquiry Report in full.
I've been following this story quite closely for something like a decade so I'm not exactly surprised by its contents, but three elements stand out to me amongst the horror.
The first is that a large majority of the victims who provided testimony describe some kind of troubled or disrupted home life. Some were molested by family members before the rape gangs ever got ahold of them. Others faced physical abuse, neglect, drug addicted parents, housing instability, and so on.
Their testimony often describes a kind of "screening" process where a girl's particular vulnerability was evaluated with more moderate boundary pushing before escalation to full on rape and abuse.
This isn't necessarily surprising given the nefarious intentions the gangs had for these girls, but their willingness to explicitly target the absolute most vulnerable children who were already struggling sickens me. These girls, more than anyone, needed some kind of adult guidance in their lives, and this vulnerability was cynically exploited to initiate them into an even more egregious Hell.
Which brings me to the second detail, which is the extreme violence these girls were subjected to. "Grooming Gang" is an unacceptable euphemism that may accurately describe common initiatory tactics employed against these girls, but which criminally downplays the behavior of their abusers once initiated.
These girls were not "merely" groomed into sex. They were not "merely" raped. They were not "merely" trafficked. They were subjected to a program of overtly racialized sexual torture and humiliation designed to maximally degrade them and kill them in their souls. And this was "acceptable" because they were White and not Muslims.
This detail fundamentally alters the character of these crimes. This was not horny men out of control or even cross-cultural understanding gaps around the age of consent. This was a targeted program of ritualized torture and subjugation as a means of ethnic domination. In other words, these gangs are conducting war against the White British using serial child rape and torture as a form of conquest.
These are not crimes in the conventional sense. These are war crimes being conducted by one civilization against another, and they need to be treated as such.
And finally, the third point (encapsulated in the excerpt below) is that every single level of the state utterly failed these girls in the most egregious and unfathomable ways imaginable.
It's one thing when you have no physical evidence and are confronted with a "he said / she said" situation with respect to a rape allegation. It's another thing entirely when you have a pre-teen frequent flier at the NHS back again for her Nth sexually transmitted disease treatment, a 13 year old with broken glass shards embedded in her vagina, or a pregnant 13 year old.
These are cases with obvious alarming physical evidence that no one addressed in any meaningful way.
Politicians (Labour in particular) covered it up and suppressed action into investigations in order to maintain the Islamic bloc vote.
Police suppressed investigations, dismissed accusations and evidence, intimidated victims into silence, arrested victims for the crimes of their abusers, dismissed proven cases of rape with impotent warning letters, and in some cases directly raped the girls themselves.
Care homes disregarded obvious signs of abuse (including outright confessions), and enabled their abusers to maintain consistent access to the girls, in some cases acting more like pimps than caregivers.
Social workers addressed victims' needs so incompetently they recommended victims audition for a TV show role about being a child prostitute because it was "relatable" and even attended a victim's coerced sham marriage to her abuser.
NHS staff consistently failed to do anything in the face of overt medical evidence of obvious, undeniable sex crimes against these girls, treating the acute problem and sending them on their way with no protection whatsoever.
And teachers, much like the social workers, routinely delivered their students into the predatory arms of their abusers as they waited outside the schools, and utterly failed to appropriately address signs or confessions of abuse.
Virtually every arm of the state is directly complicit in exacerbating the abuse. Not one single institution at any level reliably offered protection or recourse to these girls.
As far as I am concerned I Restore government would be entirely justified in firing every single person in the employ of the state. If they are not a documented whistleblower they are complicit and thus compromised, and none of them have any business retaining their roles or their pensions. On the contrary large numbers of state officials deserve severe penalties for criminal negligence or outright complicity in these crimes.
Justice for these crimes will necessarily take place at a scale that will shock the pacified sensibilities of the over-socialized Liberal West, but nothing short of a biblical level reckoning will be sufficient to qualify as justice in this case.
@RupertLowe10 is not wrong to draw comparisons to the Holocaust. It is the only appropriate frame of reference in the popular zeitgeist that articulates the actual magnitude of what was allowed to take place under successive British governments. Nor is he wrong to propose the reinstatement of the death penalty as the appropriate restitution for these crimes.
The rapists and state officials who enabled this atrocity both deserve to hang. And I pray that the British public will entrust Rupert with the power to deliver justice long overdo.
In any case I am deeply appreciative of his efforts to bring this to light. He is the hero Britain needs right now.
Vote Restore. Deliver these girls justice.