@xereeto We form governments to protect our human rights. The government isn’t itself the human right.
The concept of the human right exists even if it isn’t being protected.
For example, slavery is a violation of human rights even if the govt isn’t protecting against it.
@ZaidJilani Imagine an Athiest says Catholics and Protestants are actually a very similar ideologies … and then someone tries to argue it isn’t true because “Protestants viewed Catholics as ideological enemies” … they did, but they also have the same core beliefs.
@KamalaHarris If simultaneously Trump won 2016 against Clinton, and Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
Can it be true that Biden won in 2020 and China also interfered in the 2020 election?
@captgouda24 Do you believe that the United States has the jurisdiction to make tourists in the US enrole in Selective Service (at least the males between 18-25)
@RepJasmine Who here thinks male tourists/student-visa holders in the US between the ages of 18-25 should be required to enroll in Selective Service?
Because legal Immigrants and Citizens are required to do so. But visitors/tourists don’t because they weren’t “subject to the jurisdiction”
Based upon this Supreme Court ruling on “Subject to the jurisdiction” we can and should require (under penalty) 18+ old male tourists and those on student Visas to enroll in the Selective Service. Just like citizens and legal immigrants.
@mhdksafa When you freely give your own stuff, it’s Christian charity.
When you force someone else to give up their own stuff (or if you are compelled by force to do it) then it’s anti-Christian socialism
@Suzierizzo1 “Im a judge, and not a legislator. We are supposed to interpret law, not pass statutory legislation. Even if we don’t like the legislation. Thats what congress is for, they are elected by the people to pass the laws the people want”