Co-founder, @ConGeostrategy. Interests: #UK geostrategic and defence policy. Formerly at @BALTDEFCOL, @EU_ISS, and other places. All tweets are personal.
How crazy can you get? The Russians released nerve agent in a British city and do everything in their power to undermine our country whenever the opportunity arises...
The imminent threat from Russia is a NATO fiction to justify their complete capitulation to Trump's demands for more military spending.
The increase should not go ahead.
Fund rise in military spending from tax on middle earners, says Resolution Foundation
https://t.co/ygSmhbaxvI
Kept secret. Now revealed. 🚀🇩🇪
The German Navy just tested the Israeli 🇮🇱 LORA ballistic missile from a German frigate in the North Atlantic — quietly, deliberately and with a range of 500+ km.
NATO 3.0 looks like this:
Europe is taking more responsibility, building serious capabilities and keeping a few cards close to the chest.
Deterrence just got a little more interesting.⚓️🚀
#WeAreNATO @GermanyNATO
✍️ ‘The UK risks creeping isolation.’
Tomorrow, we publish new research by William Freer, our Research Fellow (National Security), with input from @paulmasonnews , our Aneurin Bevan Adjunct Fellow (Defence and Resilience), examining how the UK can move beyond its traditional role as a transatlantic ‘bridge’ and adopt a more activist ‘Hercules hold’ to sustain defence industrial collaboration between North America and Europe.
🗞️ Look out for the full #Report tomorrow!
@BrianMcDonaldIE It really is a very strong line of argument. If I can shoot off your head (and heart and internal organs for good measure), even if you can utterly machine-gun my body, you will think very hard before you contemplate pulling the trigger...
Britain has enough operational nuclear warheads to level Russia’s major population centres. Wreck the metropolitan areas of Moscow and St Petersburg and there’s not much left of Russia. So these silly arguments should be dismissed with the contempt they deserve.
The case for de-escalation with Russia, by Wolfgang Munchau (@EuroBriefing)
The reason why a war with Russia is so dangerous is the presence of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Russia has an estimated total inventory of over 5,400 nuclear warheads. France has 290 and Britain has 225. Given the vast size of Russia, the French nuclear arsenal could make 0.1% of the Russian territory uninhabitable. The Russian nuclear arsenal could completely destroy all of Western Europe, and still have a lot of missiles left. This is not a war Europe can win.
Read more: https://t.co/5hLTk9cO6O
She speaks the truth. The fact that Russia is escalating its attacks in this new cold war is evidence that it is feeling pain. We must push on and hit the Kremlin where it hurts – by helping Ukraine...
Russia is hitting Europe with a wave of increasingly kinetic hybrid attacks.
With this, Putin wants to scare us away from supporting Ukraine.
He will not succeed.
To the contrary, we will increase our support and invest in our own defence. We are also planning the most far-reaching sanctions against Russia yet.
This is the best way to stop Putin.
My press conference with @HMcEntee following today’s meeting of Defence Ministers ↓
Come join us! We are launching our latest report, entitled ‘Asymmetric statecraft: Strengthening British power in a more geopolitical era’, on 14th September. The launch will be followed by a reception...
https://t.co/QqaboN5HzW
@MarkMarksson Again, you misunderstand the logic of deterrence. Let’s think about this in terms of two gunmen. One has a machine gun; the other a sniper rifle. The machine gunner can spray his opponent with bullets. But the sniper can guarantee a hit to his head – and heart for good measure...
@MarkMarksson It is not strong. Britain and France both have the capacity to level Russia’s major population centres. It doesn’t matter if Russia has 5,000 or 10,000 nuclear warheads.
🗣️ General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, explains how the @RoyalNavy is changing the way it selects and assesses its leaders, moving beyond traditional top-down models to ensure leadership supports innovation and transformation across the service.
Catch the full conversation with co-hosts Viktorija Starych-Samuoliene and @paulmasonnews in the latest episode of #DefenceTalks.
🎧 Listen or watch now:
🔗 Spotify: https://t.co/WM8ktouc3Z
🔗 YouTube: https://t.co/5TkdmpsfRf
🔗 Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/wc1Ln5I17S
@BAESystemsplc | @ADSgroupUK
🇬🇧🪖Calling all British defence experts!
Please consider contributing to the APPG on Rearmament’s inquiry into Britain’s military capability, which @ConGeostrategy is assisting with:
https://t.co/fD3j8zhQ9R.
Deadline: 16th September.
@ThreshedThought
📣 CALL FOR EVIDENCE: UK Military Capability
The @ConGeostrategy, in partnership with the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Rearmament, is seeking written evidence for an inquiry into the United Kingdom’s military capability.
We invite experts across air, land, sea, space and cyber to share their assessments of Britain’s military strengths, limitations and readiness.
Submissions will inform parliamentary discussions this autumn and a forthcoming assessment of British military capability.
🗓️ Deadline: 16 September 2026
👉 Submit evidence: https://t.co/Qb4TuolMId
#UKDefence #Rearmament
@DefinitelyJSON Not sure Russia is on its last legs. But, yes, Russia is not as large as it seems. Its population is heavily concentrated into a handful of urban areas.
@AutomatedAgile Undoubtedly it has several purposes, though I am not sure the Indians have too much time for this. They tend to look at issues through the lens of their national interest...
Russia's Foreign Minister Lavrov on Britain:
Britain’s role is the most negative one, as it has been for centuries — long centuries.
Certainly in relation to Russia, but also in relation to most of Britain’s other — I wouldn’t call them partners, rather fellow travelers — because Britain has never had permanent allies.
And the United States is no exception.
The British have always looked somewhat down on those Anglo-Saxons who went across the Atlantic and created a state of their own.
Sigh. Germany is already under Britain’s nuclear deterrent. It is in NATO, which the UK pledges to defend with nuclear weapons if necessary. There are also British bases and personnel in Germany, to compound the deterrent...
🚨🇩🇪 NEW: 52% of Brits support bringing Germany under the UK’s nuclear umbrella if they contribute to the cost of trident
✅ Support - 52%
❌ Oppose - 14%
Don’t know - 36%
[@YouGov]
Yes, there has been a lot of (possibly deliberate) misunderstanding on this issue: it’s going to be a hybrid fleet, not an autonomous fleet. Crewed warships and submarines are still gliding down the slipways (so to speak) in Barrow and Glasgow...
The Royal Navy has wargamed its hybrid fleet across the service, and the answer keeps coming back that crewed warships are still needed, the First Sea Lord has said. Click image for more.
https://t.co/wWIaEPgXNk