@rmcgill25@MySportsUpdate Ok, does offering the chargers more make an extension more likely? No?
Because the Chargers have can’t force Henley to sign with Denver as a free agent?
So any hypothetical extension has nothing to do with the trade the Broncos agreed to
@Bubuganoooosh@mikeklis9news They had other others on the table and chose Denver because they offered the most. By doing this at the deadline they prevented the Chargers from pursuing any of those other trades, while also reneging on the offer that got them the trade in the first place. Shady behaviour
@livinmuh2a@GrandSlammyAndy@KelbermanNFL@ProFootballTalk Because the Chargers had other offers on the table but traded him to Denver because they offered the most
They then tried to extort lesser compensation out of the Chargers because the deadline had already past and they can’t pursue any of the other trades
@MileHighParlay There was no guarantee of an extension when they agreed to the trade in the first place, so it isn’t baked into the comp package. They agreed to the trade knowing Daiyan is on an expiring contract. They couldn’t demand a pick back if he decided not to sign with them in FA, idiot
@ronNcaphill The Broncos claim of medical issues has not prevented him from playing every game this season, and will not prevent him from playing the remainder of his contract. Anything outside of that is irrelevant to the trade comp because the Chargers have zero control over it
@ronNcaphill They have exclusive rights to negotiate a extension until the end of Daiyan’s contract
Anything that happens after that is outside the scope of this trade. The compensation reflects that. The Broncos agreed to that
@rmcgill25@MySportsUpdate What would an extension have to do with their trade with the Chargers? They are negotiating with Henley about a extension, not the Chargers
@GV_____S@LABoltzfan@MySportsUpdate What the fuck does that have to do with this trade?
His contract is up this year. The Chargers don’t control what Henley does in free agency