Independent, self-sufficient, classically educated with logic and reason.
You need your words to defend your firearms and your firearms to defend your words.
@PaulCha94025901@the_pauls_pizza seems to be doing very well.
They've hosted several events on the pro independence side and are always busy.
Perhaps it has alot more to do with a local economic situation than you are willing to see.
The area you're pointing out has been hit hard economicly.
@CSmartarsery@phyxx Holding an elected public service position used to be considered an honour bestowed upon you by your peers.
Now it's viewed as an opportunity to barrel up your turn to the trough.
I believe the disrespect our administrations hold us in is the fault of the electorate.
Cowardly.
@MerifromAlberta@CPC_HQ I've informed both my MLA and MP that outside of the memberships I carry to be whatever part of votive directives I can participate with, ALL my donations are going to community charities and the Alberta Independence initiative directly.
They want my support?
Produce action.
@CoryBMorgan I am still waiting for the rest of you to understand that the Left WILL NEVER accept No as an answer.
It is THEIR WAY or no way at all.
This is no different than the tactics they have used in the East.
You either get in line or go away.
Most serious Freedom lovers left.
Let me get this straight. If a gymgoer feels intimidated by a bladed weapon, it's an irrational fear.
But under Bill C-9, if somebody feels intimidated by my political beliefs, I can go to prison for 10 years?
Canada is beyond broken.
Looky here!
Another "Forever Canadian" that believes the best answer to a question they cannot understand is to kill the source of the question.
Is censorship the only response they can come up with?
Do they not have ANY other tactic they could use to win minds to their side?
Ban Fox News in Canada. They do sweet piss all for our country; it's nothing but a broadcast National Enquirer. Get that shit out of here. ๐จ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฆ
Goes to show how honest they are about Freedom when they actually have something valuable to lose.
Canadian "leadership" doesn't give a rat's ass about the power OF the People.
They only care about power OVER the People.
Virtue signalling to the cause without consequences.
CANADA SUPPORTS SELF-DETERMINATIONโUNTIL IT HAPPENS INSIDE CANADA
Over the last 50 years, people around the world have voted in referendums to leave an existing country and establish a sovereign state:
๐ฉ๐ฏ 1977 โ Djibouti
Separated from France
๐ธ๐ฎ 1990 โ Slovenia
Separated from Yugoslavia
๐ฑ๐น 1991 โ Lithuania
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
๐ช๐ช 1991 โ Estonia
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
๐ฑ๐ป 1991 โ Latvia
Restored independence from the Soviet Union
๐ฌ๐ช 1991 โ Georgia
Separated from the Soviet Union
๐ญ๐ท 1991 โ Croatia
Separated from Yugoslavia
๐ฒ๐ฐ 1991 โ North Macedonia
Separated from Yugoslavia
๐ฆ๐ฒ 1991 โ Armenia
Separated from the Soviet Union
๐น๐ฒ 1991 โ Turkmenistan
Separated from the Soviet Union
๐บ๐ฆ 1991 โ Ukraine
Separated from the Soviet Union
๐ฆ๐ฟ 1991 โ Azerbaijan
Confirmed its independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union
๐บ๐ฟ 1991 โ Uzbekistan
Confirmed its independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union
๐ง๐ฆ 1992 โ Bosnia and Herzegovina
Separated from Yugoslavia
๐ช๐ท 1993 โ Eritrea
Separated from Ethiopia
๐น๐ฑ 1999 โ Timor-Leste
Voted to reject continued rule by Indonesia and became independent in 2002
๐ฒ๐ช 2006 โ Montenegro
Separated from Serbia and Montenegro
๐ธ๐ธ 2011 โ South Sudan
Separated from Sudan
Canada ultimately recognized every one of these countries as a sovereign state. In many cases, Canada established diplomatic relations, provided assistance and supported the new countryโs development.
Canada did not refuse to recognize them because they were too small.
Canada did not tell them they could never establish institutions, negotiate trade agreements, operate a government or participate in the international community.
Canada did not make recognition conditional on proving that independence would be effortless, risk-free or immediately profitable.
Their people made a democratic choice and Canada accepted the resulting countries.
But when the same question is raised inside Canada, the language suddenly changes.
๐จ๐ฆ Quebec, 1980
More than 1.48 million Quebecers voted for a mandate to negotiate sovereignty-association. Canadians and federal political leaders mobilized to preserve Canada, and the proposal was defeated.
๐จ๐ฆ Quebec, 1995
More than 2.3 million Quebecers voted for sovereignty.
Once again, Quebecers were warned about money, trade, investment, currency, pensions and whether Quebec could afford to become a country.
๐จ๐ฆ Alberta, 2026
Albertans are not being asked to immediately declare independence on October 19th.
They are being asked whether Alberta should remain a province or whether the Alberta government should begin the legal process required to hold a future binding referendum on separation.
It is a vote about whether Albertans should be allowed to take the next democratic step.
Yet many Canadians are already saying Alberta could never afford independence, could never build a country and should not even seriously consider sovereignty.
That exposes a remarkable double standard:
When people overseas seek sovereignty, it is called self-determination.
When Quebecers seek sovereignty, it is called a threat to national unity.
When Albertans seek a democratic vote, it is called reckless, divisive or impossible.
The new countries on this list did not all begin wealthy, stable or free from uncertainty. Independence required difficult negotiations, institution-building and major decisions about trade, borders, laws, currency and international relations.
But they created sovereign countries.
Quebec and Alberta are repeatedly told they could not afford to become countries.
Yet Canada recognizes countries around the world that began with fewer resources, weaker institutions and far greater obstacles.
The honest position should be consistent:
Either people have the democratic right to consider and pursue sovereigntyโor they do not.
That principle should not disappear simply because the people seeking the vote happen to live inside Canada.
This is a perfect example of the duplicity of a Liberal mind virus infected person.
They call for a FULL BOYCOTTING of all products and services from the USA...
ON AN AMERICAN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM!
The lack of self awareness is astounding.
How do these people exist?
@nenshi Remember the petitions you were planning to use to have MPs recalled, including the Premiere?
The ones that failed to get even close to the required signatures?
How much was that FAILED NDP/UNION fiasco going to cost taxpayers?
But SUCCESSFUL petions are the problem?
The Liberal Party needs Alberta to stay in Canada so it can continue funding Ottawa's reckless spending.
The Conservative Party needs Alberta to stay because we are their pathway to forming government.
Neither is fighting for Alberta's interests. They're fighting for their own.
And when you ask them one simple question:
What tangible benefit does Alberta receive by remaining in Canada? they never have an answer.
Instead, we get the same empty slogans.
"Unity."
"We're stronger together."
"Canada is better together."
Those aren't benefits. They're talking points.
The reality is the clearest beneficiaries of Alberta remaining in Canada are the rest of Canada and Canada's political elite, not Albertans.
@Martyupnorth I'll answer a call, if they bother to try.
But what does it matter?
Are we to expect honest or transparent action and information from an institution that has been running an obvious interference campaign against us from the beginning?
I'm not holding my breath or my tongue.
Ok Mr. Lloyd...we need solutions...
Will Canada fix Canada?
Will Canada eliminate Equalization?
Will Canada make all provinces equal in confederation? Will our votes matter federally?
Will Canada remove Section 1 of the Charter of Rights to ensure politicians can never take our freedoms and rights ever again?
Will Canada learn from its mistakes and stop our country from bleeding investment, revenues and people? To the point taxpayers have to pay for resource projects or they don't get built?
Or double down on carbon taxes and the types of policies and legislation that lost Canada Trillions?
No. Canada will not fix itself.
Free Alberta.
@Martyupnorth This man was NAMED in the Islamic rape gang inquiry as being one of the authority figures purposely getting in the way of investigation into claims of attacks and assaults.
Watch the JRE podcast with Rupert Lowe where he details the issue.
@YukonStrong They rename themselves the Capitulation Party of Canada.
They stand for nothing, fall for anything and constantly cave under pressure.
It's the exact reason they can no longer be called a "right leaning party", let alone Conservative anymore.
What are they trying to conserve?
@PeterSweden7@MRolly19 What's to understand?
Women are an enigma.
Their brains are wired differently.
Which is why they traditionally needed a man for protection.
Otherwise, they might send the kids out to play with the wolves while inviting the bear into the house.
If you're going to insult somebody publicly, give them the benefit of a tag to respond.
@JeffreyRWRath
While we're talking finances; how about we audit your accounts to see how much your "flip-flop" on COVID protocols cost?
Since we are speculating, that is...
Funny how these "Forever Canadians" like to tout themselves as the "Protectors of Democracy" while blocking anyone they disagree with from comment.
Not that I'm interested in talking with someone so open minded that their brains have fallen out
I've been saying this for decades.
Democratic Government operates on reasonable accommodation of reasonable legislation.
It's a voluntary exchange between leadership and the people they purport to lead.
If the legislation is no longer reasonable, withdraw voluntary compliance.
There's a years-long playbook: paint anyone who wants less government in their daily life as "against" people, "taking things away," dangerous.
But look at who's actually been slowly changing everythingโhow your kids are taught, what you're allowed to know as a parent, what words you're allowed to use, who wins and who loses in society... the list goes on and on.
A decade later: people angrier, more divided, more tribal, less happy. Their ideology needs total controlโof speech, gender, identity, of what power you get based on class, skin colour, or culture. Without that control, it collapses.
The people who remade your whole life to fit their goals are now the ones calling you dangerous for wanting it back.