@RegalOS65 @Mad_Houri @SussexHenryVIII Yeah, H was born a prince, but his wife, whether she is biracial or not, was not born a princess. Titles are not “birthrights” if they have to be bestowed upon the individuals. The king’s letter patent set royal protocol. “Stupid”? The nerve of him!
@RegalOS65 @Mad_Houri @SussexHenryVIII Oh, sure, ok. Naming a child after the head of the “racist” family, after complaining to Oprah & the world of that family’s “racism”—as I said, that makes NO sense. At all. Not for a moment. And using the titles from the “racist” family. Yeah, right.😳
@RegalOS65 @Mad_Houri @SussexHenryVIII Why not? Because it makes NO sense to name a child after a “racist,” no matter how much a parent loves that person, or use titles from the “racist” family. Think about it.
@RegalOS65 @Mad_Houri @SussexHenryVIII The royal family is not mine. Two questions: if the RF is racist, like you say, why did H & M name their daughter after the queen of the racist RF? And why do they continue using the titles the queen of the racist RF bestowed upon them? 🤔
@RegalOS65@byetwit How is the RF copying H & M? How to dress—M’s clothes often don’t fit, one dress still had a price tag on it, another was see-through. How to speak—whining like H & M about their tough lives & preaching about how to live? Those are SOME lessons, for sure.