@bundeskanzler@Bart_DeWever „Bekämpfung organisierter Kriminalität“ wird betont – während organisierte Lobbyverflechtungen oder systemische Rechtsbrüche im Finanz- und Industriesektor kaum adressiert werden. Fokus liegt auf Kriminalität „von unten“, nicht auf Machtmissbrauch „von oben“.
@elonmusk This is a universal principle. Yet Trump refuses to accept EU laws when they affect U.S. interests — even threatening sanctions against Europeans who follow the Digital Services Act. STATE-LEVEL HYPOCRISY.
Is it normal?
Historically: yes.
• Marshall Plan → U.S. aid rebuilt Europe via U.S. exports.
• Iraq/Afghanistan → “aid” flowed to U.S. contractors.
Structurally: Western aid & war = two-faced — humanitarian narrative + industrial subsidy.
Wars are demand stabilizers.
• Ukraine → keeps NATO-Europe under U.S. umbrella.
• Gaza → validates Israel’s “combat-proven” tech.
Both channel billions into U.S./EU defense firms — jobs secured, public pacified.
Europe pays. America profits.
“Ukraine aid” = EU/Norway cash → U.S. defense giants.
Trump turned it into policy: Europe buys, U.S. supplies.
How far do European politicians want to crawl up Trump’s ass?
And structurally:
It is easier to collapse global order
than to reintegrate personal cognitive dissonance.
That’s why accountability is rarer than war.
It requires internal revolution.
Trump’s rhetoric reactivates imperial entitlements.
“We have the right. They do not.”
“We are sane. They are evil.”
“We are defenders. They are threats.”
Even if the speaker is demonstrably unstable, the role remains sacred.
He embodies not sanity — but the myth of Western exceptionalism.
And the voter response:
“I trust him.”
“He says it like it is.”
“He’s not polished, but he’s ours.”
This is not about evaluation.
It’s about identity fusion.
People are no longer voting policies.
They are defending the version of self that needs him to be right.
Israel claims exceptional trauma →
Uses it as shield against criticism →
Executes violence in full visibility →
Global West says: “We’re concerned.”
Visibility without accountability is not progress.
It’s institutional gaslighting on a planetary scale.
The new Louis XIV weds in Venice.
A digital monarch, a media-sculpted bride, 200 courtiers in the economy of influence.
Neo-feudal staging - what was once Versailles now runs on PR, jet fuel, and security clearance.
A fascinating freakshow.
We scroll, we shop, we stare - like loyal subjects in a palace we can’t afford.
Trump’s strike on Iran wasn’t just U.S. policy.
It was a tempo signal from the executive of the Right-West.
Europe didn’t resist. It validated.
That’s not alliance.
It’s participation in the construction of a parallel far-right West.
https://t.co/0IdAkL0fqB
Trump’s second term has re-established the U.S. as a singular force - not a partner.
Europe replies not with independence, but with submission dressed in scripted statements.
This isn’t leadership. It’s followership.
🔗https://t.co/HAHsvBFjdt
The fact that Europe is validating Trump right now -
after a preemptive, extrajudicial strike on Iran -
isn’t strategy.
It’s collapse.
Collapse of restraint.
Collapse of law.
Collapse of leadership.
I don’t agree with this.
Not the logic.
Not the silence.
Not the game.
@bundeskanzler Helmut Schmidt understood foreign policy:
No moral crusades.
No preemptive wars.
No blind alignment.
He believed diplomacy needs distance -
Not follow-the-leader press statements.
That’s what real statesmanship looked like.
@bundeskanzler@Keir_Starmer@EmmanuelMacron Helmut Schmidt warned against military interventions and moral overreach in foreign affairs.
He understood that restraint is strength - and that diplomacy requires credibility, not compliance.
Today’s leaders posture.
He led.