Jasmine Temelkovska

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q10: Quite valuable, as it is important to see things from a patient's perspective #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q9: Yes, 58% preferred a shared role in decision making and 31% preferred an active role which they hadn't experienced #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q8: Yes, I think they mentioned something about a post hoc analysis? #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q7: Yes, it was ethically approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Academic Medical Center and data was handled anonymously #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q6: Yes, as interviews were conducted by a trained psychologist to minimize bias #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q5: Yes, questionnaires were collected (quantitative) and a random sub group participated in an in-depth interview (qualitative) #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q4: Yes, it was focused towards patients with AAA and PAOD but excluded patients who couldn't complete the questionnaire in Dutch #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q3: Yes, as it used a mixed methodology through which they were able to gain the patient's perspective #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q2: Yes, as qualitative outcomes were used for clarification and exploration of the quantitative outcomes #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q1: Yes, to explore the patients' decision making preferences and important barriers for the application of SDM #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q11. Yes, as they bought a bulk package of text messages which would have been cost effective and still got a good outcome #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q10. Yes, LDL cholesterol levels were considered and secondary outcomes such as BMI and systolic BP were too #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q9. Yes, as they did include a variety of patients from diverse backgrounds which can be applied to different local areas #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q8. Pretty precise, as they used a CI of 95% #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q7.Primary outcome was significant, whilst only some of the secondary outcomes were significant (physical activity and smoking) #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

@ChapsJuls It only mentioned the intervention participants, so no?

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q6. Yes they were all sent a message 4 -5 times a week, however the intervention participants were also given an extra questionnaire #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q5. Yes they were similar, table 1 illustrates all the baseline characteristics #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q4. Yes the recruiting personnel and clinicians were blinded to the assignment only #UTSEBP

[Jasmine Temelkovska @JasTemelkovska]

Q3. Yes, they were. This can be seen through the figure in the paper mentioning how many people died or didn't participate #UTSEBP