@PressSec An absolute well thought out mission ever executed in many many years. Well DONE ! Mission complete ! From top down and ALL who was involved in the mission well done, mission goal succeeded. A decision that had no choice but given GREEN light, Semper Fi
@realDonaldTrump An absolute well thought out mission ever executed in many many years. Well DONE ! Mission complete ! From top down and ALL who was involved in the mission well done, mission goal succeeded. A decision that had no choice but given GREEN light, Semper Fi
@JDVance An absolute well thought out mission ever executed in many many years. Well DONE ! Mission complete ! From top down and ALL who was involved in the mission well done, mission goal succeeded. A decision that had no choice but given GREEN light, Semper Fi
@libsoftiktok Evidently Zelensky does not want the war to stop. President Trump is trying to end the war, how ever Zelensky doest respect anything. If Trump washes his hands with Zelensky, Russia will nuke Zelensky country , end of story. Enough of the DS shit ! Semper Fi
@EndWokeness Evidently Zelensky does not want the war to stop. President Trump is trying to end the war, how ever Zelensky doest respect anything. If Trump washes his hands with Zelensky, Russia will nuke Zelensky country , end of story. Enough of the DS shit ! Semper Fi
NO it's not true and quick research can prove it.
This is from asking AI:
No, COBOL does not default to 1875 if the date is missing. In COBOL, the behavior for handling missing or invalid dates depends on the specific implementation and the data definitions used in the program. Typically, if a date is missing or invalid, the program might:
Use a default value defined by the programmer.
Leave the field with whatever value was there before (if it's an existing record being read).
Possibly use a specific date like 9999-99-99 or 0001-01-01 as placeholders (this would be defined by the application's logic, not COBOL itself).
The year 1875 has no special significance in COBOL for date handling. If you encounter such behavior, it would be due to specific programming logic within the application, not a standard COBOL feature.