@Ami_Marisol Combat experience and warfighting ability should definitely count for more in promotions, but when you throw in joint...well the joint credit system is a bit of a mess.
@thatdudeiniowa Wtf are you talking about? You can literally look up dozens of examples of egregious misconduct by senior officers, to say nothing of the complete strategic incompetence of the last 20 years.
The most effective counter-drone weapon in the largest drone war in history entered service in 1976. Gulf states want F-35s instead.https://t.co/xGQSCzkcNO
There are some things here I wholeheartedly agree with, and others I have questions or concerns:
1. If Dept. of the Army has oversight, how will we avoid resourcing and personnel shortfalls that have already made the Army a poor caretaker of its own cyber capabilities?
2. I'm curious to see more about how they arrived at these force generation numbers and timelines.
3. I understand the logic behind avoiding a cyber reserve force, but the inability of the conventional forces to incorporate reserve cyber talent is already a shortcoming, so why repeat that mistake? Places a lot of confidence in the talent development and retention capabilities of the proposed force.
4. Cyber combined arms sounds great, but how do we address the fact that concepts like the cyber-space-SOF triad and the MDTFs have never actually materialized tactical or even operational cyber.
5. More flexible promotion and career management makes a ton of sense, and is badly needed, but how does that jive with giving the notoriously inflexible Army G-1 some responsibilities in administration?
6. "Industry exchange" is great, but if it's super useful, why not formalize it as some form of reserve component? Think a Det. 201 not populated entirely by C-suite execs with no operational knowledge or dedicated resources.
7. Having more cyber JAGs who actually know cyber is badly needed, but there will be redundancies with some talent that already exists at CYBERCOM, etc.
USARC loves to put out press releases about how critical COMPO 3 is to Army logistics, engineering, etc. but at the same time Big Army seems to be neglecting modernization of those units and commands. I really worry that we are not preparing the most important parts of how we scale logistics for a truly contested environment.
The Defense Department is requesting close to $30 billion in fiscal 2027 to purchase and enable next-generation AI supercomputers and modernize the military’s computing infrastructure to power them. https://t.co/ksUjrnAAoY
Because I'm a heraldry nerd:
1. When are we going to see an Iran Campaign Medal?
2. Did Absolute Resolve get Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal credit?
3. It would be cool to see the Glider Badge and other Glider unit lineage brought back for both tactical UAVs and when we inevitably see drone-delivered infantry.
@cmcoglianese Good answer, there's also Starry. Emory Upton might be the original. I'm mostly struck by the fact Rickover would go after industry just as hard as he fought the bureaucracy.
“When submarine captains complained about the quality of work being done by outside contractors, Rickover informed all the contracting firms that after leaving a shipyard, their entire senior-management team was required to be onboard the refitted submarine the first time it dived.”
My biggest interest in this is not what is possible when you get that many smart people in a room, but how you maintain it in the field with a sort of tech-savvy BSTB.
Known as “Operation Jailbreak,” an initial swarm of engineers from roughly 20 defense companies descended on Fort Carson earlier this month with the overall goal of getting the Army’s vast stable of disparate military systems to talk to each other. https://t.co/o55AbZB6VN