Jason Catania

Decidedly un-woke priest and Trump supporter

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Tout le monde pense que le monde libre a gagné en 1989, à la chute du mur de Berlin.

C'est faux.

Et c'est exactement pour ça que le monde est aujourd'hui en feu.

Ce qui est tombé le 9 novembre 1989, c'est un appareil.

Une économie planifiée, un empire militaire, un mur de béton. Ce qui n'est pas tombé, c'est l'idée. L'idée que le monde se divise en oppresseurs et en opprimés. L'idée qu'il existe une égalité finale à atteindre, par tous les moyens. L'idée que tout ce qui existe (la famille, la nation, le mérite, l'héritage) est une structure de domination à abattre.

Cette idée-là n'était plus dans le bâtiment quand le bâtiment s'est effondré.

Il faut reprendre la chronologie, parce que tout est dans la chronologie :

Le communisme économique avait un défaut fatal : il était réfutable. Il promettait l'abondance, il produisait des famines. Il promettait l'émancipation, il produisait des barbelés. Budapest 1956, Prague 1968, L'Archipel du Goulag publié à Paris en 1973, les boat people de 1979 : à chaque décennie, le réel envoyait sa réfutation. Les boat people étaient une réfutation flottante, visible depuis les plages.

Alors l'idéologie a fait ce que fait tout organisme menacé : elle a muté.

La mutation a un nom, et j'en ai raconté la généalogie ici : la French Theory.

Foucault a déplacé la guerre du terrain des faits, où le communisme perdait à chaque fois, vers le terrain du savoir lui-même.

S'il n'y a pas de vérité, s'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir, alors plus aucune famine, plus aucun mur, plus aucun goulag ne peut réfuter quoi que ce soit.

La French Theory n'a pas enterré le marxisme.

Elle l'a rendu irréfutable.

Et la mutation a des dates. Toutes antérieures à 1989.

1934 : l'École de Francfort, chassée d'Allemagne, s'installe à Columbia. La critique de l'économie devient critique de la culture.

1964-1965 : Marcuse, exilé allemand devenu professeur américain, remplace le prolétariat défaillant par un nouveau sujet révolutionnaire (les minorités, les étudiants, les marginaux) et écrit noir sur blanc que la tolérance doit être accordée aux mouvements de gauche et refusée à ceux de droite.

Octobre 1966 : le débarquement a une date précise. Université Johns Hopkins, Baltimore. Derrida, Barthes, Lacan présentent la pensée française aux campus américains.

1967 : Rudi Dutschke lance le mot d'ordre, la longue marche à travers les institutions.

1968 : les révolutions de rue échouent partout.

Qu'importe. La révolution ne passera plus par la rue, elle passera par la salle de classe.

1975-1985 : Yale, Berkeley, Columbia absorbent la théorie, qui devient le système d'exploitation des humanités.

1987 : Allan Bloom publie The Closing of the American Mind pour donner l'alerte. Un million d'exemplaires vendus.

L'université le traite de réactionnaire et passe à autre chose.

L'Amérique avait son Aron, elle en a fait la même chose que nous du nôtre.

Puis arrive le 9 novembre 1989.

Le Mur tombe. L'Occident célèbre. Fukuyama avait déclaré la fin de l'Histoire dès l'été, avant même la chute. On démantèle les missiles, on encaisse les dividendes de la paix, on déclare le match terminé.

Nous avons célébré notre victoire sur une adresse vide. L'idéologie avait déménagé vingt ans plus tôt. Nous avons gagné contre les chars et perdu contre les chaires.

Pendant ce temps, l'autre empire communiste faisait la lecture inverse. Pékin avait écrasé Tian'anmen dans le sang cinq mois avant Berlin. Sinistre, mais lucide sur un point : la Chine savait que la guerre était idéologique.

Elle a choisi : abandonner l'économie marxiste, garder le contrôle du récit. L'Occident a fait l'exact opposé : il a gardé le marché et absorbé l'idéologie. Trente-cinq ans plus tard, regardez qui construit des centrales et qui déboulonne ses statues.

Vous voulez la preuve que c'est le même logiciel ? Faites la table de correspondance.

La lutte des classes est devenue la lutte des identités.

Les koulaks sont devenus les privilégiés.

L'autocritique maoïste est devenue le privilege checking. Les commissaires politiques sont devenus les DEI officers.

Le samizdat est devenu le compte shadowbanné.

La nomenklatura a quitté Moscou pour Davos et Bruxelles.

Et le paradis ne s'appelle plus la société sans classes : il s'appelle l'équité, l'égalité des résultats.

Exactement ce que je décrivais ici il y a quelques semaines.

On me dira : il n'y a pas de Goulag.

C'est vrai. C'est même tout le génie de la version 2.0.

Le communisme dur devait briser les corps parce qu'il ne tenait pas les esprits.

Le communisme mou tient les esprits : il lui suffit de briser les carrières.

Pas de camps, des services RH.
Pas de procès de Moscou, des excuses publiques.
Pas de Sibérie, la mort sociale.
Demandez aux émigrés du bloc de l'Est installés en Occident ce qu'ils ressentent en traversant une université américaine en 2026.
Ils reconnaissent l'odeur.

Et voilà pourquoi le monde est en feu.

Une civilisation a passé trente-cinq ans à enseigner à ses propres enfants qu'elle était le problème. Résultat : elle ne sait plus défendre ses frontières, transmettre son héritage, ni même nommer ses ennemis.

Quand la présidente de Harvard, devant le Congrès, répond que condamner un appel au génocide « dépend du contexte », vous voyez le logiciel tourner en production.

Et les prédateurs du dehors lisent cette faiblesse comme un livre ouvert : Moscou teste, Pékin patiente, l'islamisme avance dans les rues de nos capitales.

Le feu extérieur n'est que la conséquence du désarmement intérieur. On ne brûle bien que les maisons qui se sont vidées de leurs défenseurs.

Le Mur n'est pas tombé. Il s'est déplacé. Il ne sépare plus l'Est de l'Ouest : il passe désormais à l'intérieur de chaque institution occidentale, entre ceux qui construisent et ceux qui déconstruisent.

La première guerre froide s'est gagnée avec des missiles et du PIB. La seconde se gagnera avec des écoles, des médias libres et des modèles d'IA. Celui qui écrit les valeurs dans les machines écrira le prochain 1989.

Cette fois, ne nous trompons pas de victoire. Au travail.

[Eric Sammons @EricRSammons]

When a Church official says “You need to accept Vatican II” what he means is, “You can’t criticize any of the disastrous decisions we’ve made since Vatican II.”

[Fr. Matthew Venuti @mvenuti1980]

I don't know what’s going on here, but the Msgr’s statements on aliens don't contradict any Church teachings, though the Cardinal has previously contradicted the Church’s teachings on ordination and marriage. Rossetti is also involved holding the Church accountable over sexual abuse, while the Cardinal has been accused himself. So…

[Reverend Jordan Wells @WellsJorda89710]

🚨 THIS IS DISGUSTING. What we’re watching in California is election corruption in plain sight.
NBC just admitted it: “They’d need a flood of ballots coming in the wee hours of the morning to lift both Dems above (R) Steve Hilton.”

While Florida and Texas had clear results on election night, California drags it out with mysterious late-night ballot dumps.
This isn’t democracy. This is how a corrupt one-party state cheats to stay in power.
Enough.

If Republicans like John Thune actually fought back and demanded real election integrity reforms — paper ballots, same-day counting, voter ID, no more hidden mail-ins — we could stop this.

Californians deserve better. Steve Hilton is fighting for real change. Share if you’re tired of the games.
#StopTheStealCA #HiltonForGovernor #ElectionIntegrityNow

[John Daniel Davidson @johnddavidson]

At the heart of Hart-Celler was an assumption that immigrants from Europe were no more desirable than immigrants from the Philippines or Guatemala or anywhere else. In essence, it codified an assertion of multiculturalism, the liberal belief that assimilation to American society had no real cultural component, and that the entire concept of assimilation was racist and backwards.

[Jason Miyares @JasonMiyaresVA]

What we heard today from CA Descano during the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the dangerous impacts of Fairfax County’s sanctuary city policy should alarm everyone in Virginia. Treating illegal immigrants who committed violent crimes differently than US citizens because of their immigration status is just wrong.

[Edward Pentin @EdwardPentin]

“I have watched this strategy operate for forty years, from the inside, in the Church of England and the wider Anglican Communion.

I watched it in real time. I know how it ends. And I want to say clearly: what Study Group 9 is proposing to the Catholic Church is not a new idea. It is a well-documented process with a well-documented outcome. The outcome is theological sterility, schism, and the quicksand of relativism.

The Anglican experience followed a precise sequence that is worth naming, because it is the sequence Study Group 9 is initiating.

It began with the claim that existing teaching was pastorally inadequate — that the Church was failing to accompany people in difficult situations, and that a more attentive, experience-sensitive approach was required. This was, and is, genuinely appealing. No one wants to be the voice of cold doctrine against warm human suffering.

It moved to the installation of a new methodology, one in which discernment was communal, experience was primary, and the tradition was one voice among many in an ongoing conversation. Scripture remained ‘formally authoritative’, but its plain sense was increasingly subjected to “contextual” rereadings that found in it not what it said but what the new framework required it to mean.

It proceeded through a series of incremental steps, each presented as modest, provisional, non-binding and pastorally loving. Each step generated the social and institutional facts that made the next step inevitable. By the time the destination became visible, the journey was too far advanced to reverse.

The destination was not renewal. It was not (as it pretended to be) a more compassionate, more pastorally effective Church. The destination was a Church that no longer knew what it believed, could no longer speak with authority on the questions that matter most to human beings, and had lost the capacity to form the kind of disciples who could resist the spirit of the age.” ~ @gavinashenden

https://t.co/QsTSX3wVep

https://t.co/VgXEjtYc7U

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

Liberal Democracy in America is ultimately doomed in the long run because the Democratic Party fundamentally believes that any attempt to roll back the various pillars of Progressivism constitutes a morally illegitimate breakdown of the legal order itself, and the only appropriate response is to blow up the entire system in order to prevent that from ever happening.

No system can survive when one side believes that they’re never allowed to lose and that any deviation from eternal victory constitutes some sort of cosmic-scale crime that must be rectified by any means necessary.

That’s what Progressivism is. It treats itself as the necessary precondition for what makes a Liberal Democracy legitimate. It does not see itself as merely one rival among many competing worldviews, with each fairly operating within a democratic system. It views itself as the political manifestation of pure morality.

Almost no one in the Democratic Party actually believes in “Liberal Democracy” anymore. It’s just an empty catechism that’s invoked because no one has the balls to publicly say “I want my side to impose its will on the entire country.”

But that’s exactly what’s going on, and no amount of flowery euphemisms about “the will of the people” or “the rule of law” can hide this fact for much longer.

If “the people” voted to overturn Progressivism, Democrats would cite “the law” to nullify their decision.

And if “the law” conflicts with Progressivism, Democrats would cite “the will of the people” to nullify it.

And if both the people and the law are against Progressivism, Democrats would simply ignore both and force it through anyway.

[Saggezza Eterna @FinalTelegraph]

Obama is utilizing his status to provide a back-channel for foreign leaders to circumvent the elected will of the American people.

The spectacle of a former executive jetting across the border to play statesman reveals the true nature of the globalist insurgency. Barack Obama remains the primary architect of a shadow government that views American sovereignty as an obstacle to be managed or dismantled. His arrival in Toronto on May 8, represents a direct assault on the current administration’s mandate. While the media paints this as a routine speaking engagement, the strategic reality is far more sinister. Obama is utilizing his status to provide a back-channel for foreign leaders to circumvent the elected will of the American people. This is the behavior of a man who believes his ideological vision grants him immunity from the laws that govern ordinary citizens. We are watching a calculated effort to preserve the neoliberal order by any means necessary, including the betrayal of national interests for the sake of a "more just" globalist hegemony.

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

At their core, modernism, postmodernism, and critical theory are all just methods of deconstruction. Their entire purpose is to take a thing and essentially subvert it from within.

How else do you get a political movement that argues urinals are art and builds things like Boston’s City Hall?

What these movements (and the Left really at large) want to do is constantly reveal the hidden power dynamics in everything and to show people that what they thought was good or natural is actually just an illusion or a social construct that’s being used as a "tool of oppression" by whoever’s in charge at the time.

But who’s in charge today? Who runs all the institutions and occupies all the elite positions in society? Does anyone think that Right-wing chuds are running all the corporate HR departments, staffing Harvard, managing the New York Times, or directing Hollywood?

If your political ideology is all about endlessly critiquing power, then why the hell should anyone respect or listen to YOU when you hold it?

The Left's OWN worldview guaranteed that there would be such a powerful backlash against them. They said everything was just a social construct used to reinforce power imbalances between oppressor and oppressed.

And then these same people were shocked to find out that tens of millions of people concluded they were the oppressors.

[Batya Ungar-Sargon @bungarsargon]

The vibes are bad. Gas is up, the conflict in Iran is dragging on, and Iran-related inflation is eating up wage growth. But President Trump’s main campaign promise was to reverse America’s decline, and that's not something you can achieve overnight. Trump is leveraging foreign and domestic policy in tandem to fulfill that promise.

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

Iran wants nukes. They want to use those nukes. The Iranian regime is run by end-times religious fanatics.

President Trump wants to make sure they never get those nukes.

Why is it impossible for Democrats to root for American success in this mission? It's baffling to me.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

It’s an insurrection only when Republicans do it.

It’s partisan gerrymandering only when Republicans do it.

It’s “norm shattering” only when Republicans do it.

Please like and share if you’re tired of the double standard.

[Steve Cortes @CortesSteve]

The Democrats target Catholics.

The Biden DOJ specifically pursued Catholics.

And yet…Church leaders take EVERY opportunity to align themselves with our oppressors!

Why???

@DailySignal article in replies

[Saggezza Eterna @FinalTelegraph]

Washington Post Just Handed Trump the Blueprint to Crush Democrats Forever.

Citizenship Voting Would Have Delivered Him New Mexico and a 317 Electoral Vote Landslide.

The Washington Post just stabbed its own side in the back with cold hard numbers. Their fresh analysis proves that requiring documentary proof of United States citizenship to register and vote would have flipped New Mexico from a Democrat four-point win straight into a Trump three-point three victory. Nevada turns into a Republican fortress. Connecticut tightens dramatically. Washington state and Maryland follow the same path. Trump’s Electoral College total explodes to 317.

This comes straight from the liberal paper of record crunching the data on the SAVE America Act. The bill simply demands what federal law already requires. Only American citizens vote. No more self-attestation loopholes that let anyone check a box and cast a ballot. The Post’s modeling exposes exactly how the current system has been weaponized against the native population for years.

Leftists scream that citizenship checks suppress voters. That claim collapses the moment you look at the map. Every state that flips red under these rules proves the Democrats have been counting on non-citizen participation to hold power in places they should have lost. Their entire strategy relies on flooding the rolls with people who have no legal right to decide American elections. History records this pattern in every declining republic. Elites import new voters when the native ones start rejecting their agenda. The Post just quantified it in public.

President Trump refuses to let the bureaucracy bury this truth. He is already directing governors to implement paper ballots, same day voting, strict voter ID, and full citizenship proof. Those four changes deliver results by ten p.m. on election night. No more mysterious overnight ballot dumps. No more chain of custody scandals that erode public faith. Trump has issued executive orders updating Election Assistance Commission standards and cross-checking federal databases to purge ineligible names automatically. Wyoming became the first state to require documentary proof across all elections. Arizona exposed the gaps in real time. Momentum builds by the hour.

The SAVE America Act puts ironclad enforcement behind the principle every citizen already understands. Passport, certified birth certificate, naturalization papers. Photo ID at the polls. State flexibility for legitimate cases but never at the expense of security. Automatic cross checks with federal immigration records. This is not some experimental scheme. It is the restoration of the system the founders designed to protect the republic from foreign influence. Democrats call it extreme only because their power evaporates when the rules are enforced.

Critics claim the bill targets minorities and the poor. That lie ignores every poll showing eighty percent of Americans, including huge numbers of Democrats, demand voter ID and citizenship verification. The real victims are the legal voters whose ballots get diluted by the very illegal migration wave the previous administration engineered. Every documented case of non-citizens appearing on rolls in swing districts and blue strongholds confirms the vulnerability. The left manufactured this crisis through open borders and then weaponized it at the ballot box. Their outrage now reveals the panic of a machine that can no longer operate in the shadows.

The stakes reach far beyond 2024. The 2026 midterms sit on the horizon like a battlefield. Without the SAVE America Act, the same forces that turned close races into statistical miracles will regroup and strike again. Senate Republicans hold the majority. The House already passed this bill multiple times. The moment has arrived to force the vote, send it to the President’s desk, and lock in integrity before the next cycle begins.

Americans watch every move. The data sits in plain sight. The Washington Post handed conservatives the ultimate proof. The left’s own numbers now fuel the fire that will burn down their rigged system. The fight for election integrity accelerates. Share this truth relentlessly because the Democrats’ survival depends on your silence. The republic demands action. The time is now.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

Democrats aren’t joking

They’ll nuke the filibuster

Then pack the Supreme Court

Then award statehood to DC and Puerto Rico, making it unlikely that Republicans will ever win another election for decades

Let’s nuke it now and just creat an even playing field

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

What an incredible moment. This 10 year-old boy wants to be a priest when he grows up. @MattWalshBlog asks him why, and here was his answer:

“Because God is calling me.”

Perfect answer. God bless this young man.

🙏🙏

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

The left is sending an assassin every few months while the GOP whines about the filibuster

One side is fighting a war, the other is worried about breaking Robert’ Rules of Order

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

Retards starting tweeting that the assassination attempt was "staged" 10 seconds after it happened. No evidence for that claim. No reason to make it. Nothing at all. Just a narrative constructed out of whole cloth. They have the guy in custody, alive. And yet they'll still say this was somehow a hoax. You have to understand that, for a lot of people in this country, the truth just doesn't matter. It makes no difference to them. The truth is whatever they want it to be. These are the same people who spent years claiming that men can give birth the babies. They're living in fantasyland. They cannot differentiate between the things they wish are real and the things that are actually real. They don't recognize the distinction between these categories. They're toddlers in adult bodies. Their brains and souls are malformed. There's no saving them.

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

Trump’s right

Do this or we lose