We're getting to the point where there will be things that humanity creates that nobody understands. It is already true that almost nobody understands a particular thing in its totality. I have no idea how a computer works, but there are people who fully comprehend at least individual parts of the computer and could manufacture them from scratch if necessary. But with the advent of AI, there will be parts of systems, or even whole systems, whose inner workings nobody understands. This allows there to be magnificent new creations beyond the limits of individual human minds, but leads to the worst possible outcome being far worse than the current worst possible outcome, which is a heavily relied-upon system collapsing and nobody with the knowledge to rebuild it.
@kez0rama@i23yvi3 If they were married, then to avoid this in the future, don't marry men who have weak morals and will cheat on you. If sex is saved for marriage and he proves he can control himself enough to wait, then he probably won't cheat.
@Alissa_1014@i23yvi3 Not necessarily, but married men are less likely to cheat. Also, nobody is forcing you to marry a low-quality man who will cheat. Just don't marry porn-addicted losers, and make sure he has strong morals. This is the role that your father is supposed to play.
That sounds like a convincing argument until it is reversed by saying that the mother has no right to the body of the fetus. Almost every point in the abortion debate is a moot point because the issue is framed as either/or instead of both/and. We need to understand superimpositional structures for a more accurate picture of this phenomenon.
@banana1723 He is not lying because he doesn't claim an IQ in the 190-210 range. Others, such as news outlets and the media, have made that claim for him.
@The_Hellenist The pun really doesn't square with the original root for the word "gymnasium" it comes from the Greek word for naked. So you really just gave a gymnasium for naked men and a gynaeceum for women. Sounds pretty gay.
Do you think that endogamous pockets of white identitarians will create a subrace of whites that is not as easily manipulated and demographically replaceable as the current white race? A self-selected group of such people could induce epigenetic temperamental changes via the founder effect. Perhaps this is the next evolutionary step for whites.
Whites seem to be the only racial group that has been manipulated into being guilty about their race, and even internalized blatant racism against themselves. Every other racial group, when asked to "rate" the other races, rates themselves at the top and others at various levels beneath them. Whites rank all others the same and operate on the assumption that all opinions, cultures, and values are equal, while nobody else seems to do that. What do you think causes this lack of self-preservation and racial self-esteem? Could there be a future group of whites who recognize these issues (such as you, me, and other "race realists") and who form something of an endogamous ethnostate which self-selects for a version of whites with racial self-esteem and self-preservational instincts, which promulgates through the entire future population via the founder effect? One group that comes to mind is Return To The Land by Aarvol. These communities seem to be the most likely positive outcome. I appreciate your post. Thanks for your time.
This is true, but only at certain times in each ancient empire, usually a few generations before its decline. We tend to treat nations and empires in history as monochronic and don't differentiate between the many slices of time and civilizational stages to be found within each empire. Very little can be said about Roman, Greek, American, or any other nation's marital customs because they change rapidly and drastically throughout the duration of history. Imagine a future historian saying "the American women were married as young as twelve in some cased with very low ages of consent." This is a true statement for America two to three hundred years ago, but not anymore. So the statement that you made in this post "Women, in Europe, tended to spend a few years working before marrying in their early to mid-twenties. This was true as far back as the Roman empire. They didn't go from 'father to husband,'" is only true for some women, in some nations in Europe, and at certain times. Without specifying these things exactly, you are making an anachronistic and anatopological statement.
As an electrician, this number is fairly important to me. To find the voltage of a three-phase transformer, we must take the voltage of a single phase (120), multiply it by the square root of the number of phases (3), and then we get the total voltage. 1.73 * 120 = 207.6. Rounded up, it is 208. This is due to the three sine waves being 120 degrees out of sync. Math is pretty useful, even though it is kinda chuddy sometimes.
@RealChrisLangan When I tried to comment the first time, it told me I had "hit my daily limit for this action, please connect a phone to remove this limit". I have only had issues commenting on your posts.