Physics history & philosophy hobbyists nerd - pragmatic realist, avid cyclist.
No, you did NOT just solve every major physics problem with an LLM ~ Sorry.
I've been invited to meet with a US satellite company to discuss a collaboration on a QI space drive. I'm still waiting for SPRIN-D to decide whether to fund a modelling study for the Floating Brick: Fliegender Ziegelstein.
When did peering into the unknown and asking what if, with scientific rigor become such a crime.
We leave the good parts of being 5 behind, and keep the bad.
May I forever be 5 curious.
@JasonPaulMosher Yes. The control is insidious and everywhere. The number of physicists who have looked at me with fear and said "Careful!" as if I was committing blasphemy.
A person searching for the truth is like a moth round a light. You want to get to it, but the closer you get the more you are ridiculed, hated, banned...etc. It's like Coulumb repulsion in fusion. You need a lot of momentum to get past the potential hill.
Einstein undoubtedly was a force in physics extending and working with frameworks of Lorentz, Poincaré, Faraday, Maxwell, and Mach.
Interestingly, E=mc² was a footnote almost that was not initially understood for what it is. And one could spend some time asking what a joule is.
Here is something to think about:If the entire mass of an average 70 kg human body was converted to pure energy (via Einstein’s E=mc²), it would release roughly 6.3 × 10¹⁸ joules!
That’s equivalent to exploding 1,500 megatons of TNT — or the power of about 100,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs. Mind-blowing how much energy is locked inside each of us every single day. What does this make you think about the universe? #ScienceFacts #Physics
Also, how amazing is it that Einstein was able to understand that matter was frozen energy? Albert Einstein figured out that matter and energy are fundamentally interchangeable. He is the true GOAT.
This point is inarguable, it hides in plain sight. So, the first step for matter right now, isn’t build more atop assumption but look to understand more deeply, with precision what our observations are telling us.
Maybe unpopular, not less true.
We must be aware of what "know vs. assumed". Physacists know to varying degrees, the difference, some don't, all should.
As QCD goes, we have a set of reproducible experimental outcomes and a mathematical procedure that predicts them. This we know.
All else is assumed.
I am calling out all physicists and anyone really to help me blow the lid off this. Do you have any insight or anything to add to this? Please try and explain if so. I am not asking for your TOE I am simply asking you one question, what keeps matter stable?
I say that, to say this; if a proton asymmetric or symmetric is not known. Even in so far as physics assumed it was while building the model, it's failed conclusively to precisly develop authority of the assumption.
@memcculloch
Re: Light bending from inhomogeneous quantum background.
I'd like to email you some interesting crossover that grounds the observation.
If you're interested; potentially substantive unlock; replace the unobserved foundation with an observed one. Lmk. #funding
What spacetime really is:
A bookkeeping convenience. A way of treating your reference length as a fourth coordinate. Useful. Not fundamental.
Someone might try to prove this wrong and in doing so, learn that its right.
Unless you're a complete madman. Time is a human invented measurment.
The universe doesn’t care about human perspective.
Time as a thing is a massive example of group psychosis.
@ECSM_Research Ontological same gripe. Your medium derivation has more meat. I think my angle is a littler tighter. But we see it the same way.
Check Ghasemi (2025 dec) emergent time on Arxiv. Solid maths on the clocks.
@Sci_Nature0 You'd say both and be right for this context but this is an acceleration convergence and at these small scales doesn't capture final velocity. If they also reach the same final velocity it says a lot about gravity. The anchor is invariant to mass; no inertia in free fall.