Arguments welcome here. I'm a Liberal Constitutionalist & Anti-communist/Anti-Globalist. Leftists ideas dont survive long on a platform without heavy moderation
@gc22gc@julie_kelly2 The disability claims, settlements, & stipends are just the way they've chosen to legitimize the payments they're giving him for his "work", silence, & false testimony.
Illumina CEO Explains How Pfizer & Moderna Created Their COVID Vaccines Without The Live Virus
“What’s interesting is Moderna has never had the live virus in their site. It was all a software problem.”
@MsNicoleSadighi @stfushitlib3 @cvspharmacy None do.. When they're on the job they all use computer programs that analyze patient profiles that list medical conditions, medications, flag any conflicts, & provide info for questions. Remember, most accredited schools have funding that leads back to pharmaceutical interests.
Hmmm. It was abundantly clear that the vaccine trials did not include transmission as a primary or secondary endpoint. And thus could not comment. This tweet does appear to be violating US law around misleading information. In a normal world. Pfizer would be investigated for this
Dom went after some very powerful people. They don’t like the details he put together. He took all publicly available information but brought it together into a narrative that obviously these people didn’t like. I can’t see how any one piece of information was an issue. Many of us have shared and highlighted one or the other, however he made it into a story that was compelling and not positive for these people. I guarantee there was pressure applied here. Can’t say for the other accounts but Dom’s stuff was very pointed but valid and should be done by real journalists. They’re all afraid to do what Dom did.
YIKES! Yaccarino claims @dom_lucre
as a preliminary sacrifice to the upcoming death of the Twitter
No one is sure if it was Obama's Chef's murder or the Clinton-Haiti investigation from his recent posts; but it looks like big tech suppression is back
https://t.co/v5gRXO5LwU
Take notes today on which large conservative Twitter accounts not calling out @elonmusk for his new WOKE CEO censoring conservative accounts like @dom_lucre again
I would like to officially extend an invitation to President @JoeBiden and Hunter Biden to go to jail for running an international criminal corruption conspiracy.
Just to save everyone some time.
@Lugnatious @isabellarileyus Their apparent need for External Validation, even so far as to the private sexual preferences & behavior of others, is a toxic personality trait in my humble opinion.
This conversation could go on at length into the biological roots of submission & conformity to power structures
@Lugnatious @isabellarileyus Personally, I think it says a lot more about them that they are trying to gatekeep the sexual preferences of straight men attracted to adult women to match their own modern opinions & personal preferences.
BREAKING: Hunter Biden's lawyers are facing sanctions after they allegedly lied to the Delaware clerk in his criminal tax case.
The Biden Crime Family is at it again.
According to the Daily Mail, someone from Hunter Biden's attorney's law office called the Delaware clerk pretending to be an attorney for Republican House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith.
Smith's attorney is Theodore Kittila.
The person who lied to the Delaware clerk allegedly asked them to remove the original filing against Hunter Biden in an attempt to remove the 448 pages of congressional testimony from the IRS whistleblowers.
Once Kittila found out about the scheme, he sent a letter to the judge:
"We promptly contacted the clerk's office, and we were advised that someone contacted the court representing that they worked with my office and that they were asking the court to remove this from the docket. We immediately advised that this was inaccurate," Kittila explained.
Judge Maryellen Noreika appears to have reason to believe that Hunter Biden's lawyers were indeed behind the scheme considering she is giving them just a few more hours to explain thereselves or else they will be sanctioned.
"It appears that the caller misrepresented her identity and who she worked for in an attempt to improperly convince the clerk's office to remove the amicus materials from the docket," Noreika said.
"Therefore, it is hereby ordered that, on or before 9pm today on July 25, 2023, counsel for defendant shall show cause as to why sanctions should not be considered for misrepresentations to the court."
Below is whistleblower Joseph Ziegler explaining how investigations into Hunter Biden were always "hamstrung, limited and marginalized..."
Obstruction from every angle.
@Alphafox78 Self defense against threats to bodily integrity are already legal & making them illegal would constitute a Human Rights violation.
Self defense against threats to Property and Liberty are a gray area, but I believe provable self defense should be universally legal.
@JoeyMannarinoUS Firstly I unfollow @JoeyMannarinoUS bc he keeps making some creep nonpersona relevant again & dragging it into my life & my bedroom. 😑
Read & learn. Long, insightful thread adding the much needed preliminary context & to the current drive to war on the Eastern front of Europe that's conveniently ignored by corporate media.
"The de facto backing by the West of the violent overthrow of the democratically elected and relatively pro-Russian government in Ukraine by means of the Maidan massacre and assassination attempts also contributed to the start of the conflicts in Crimea and Donbas and conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and Russia and the West which now escalated into the Ukraine-Russia war and a proxy war between the West and Russia in Ukraine, which became a US client state after the “Euromaidan.” 27/
@eye95 A lot of ignorant people in comments saying things like "We already have a political spectrum" or "facism is right wing"
Somewhere we've failed to properly identify these analyses as what they are, THEORIES. Many widely accepted but inherently flawed theories are taught as facts
@bbrashaw @eye95 We have to stop using their terminology for starters, "classic" is a false rebranding of our foundational ideology in order to redefine "Liberal" & "Liberalism" into what would be better described as collectivist idealism that has virtually no legitimate Liberal values to it.
Now that I have long-form, how can I explain this better?
What is the key difference between right and left? How can we discern whether an ideology is right or left?
The key is who they say will make the world better. Government or individuals?
Communism, fascism, naziism, other forms of tyranny, and even lesser forms of leftism such as progressivism, all hold that the People are beholden to the state to make their lives better.
Our #Founders and #Framers, today’s conservatives, Madisonians (me), libertarians, and true liberals (not leftists who call themselves liberals) believe that the state only has the authority conceded by the People and that those authorities should be limited.
With leftism, the state is responsible, even to the point of allowing criminals to blame the state and society for their wrongdoing, meaning that they should be punished less—or not at all. The gravest sin to a leftist is defiance of the state. That cannot be forgiven. Punishment for that should be harsh. Even if defiance of the state is not a black-letter crime, those who defy will be investigated until something, anything can be used as an excuse to charge them.
Folks on the right place responsibility with the individual. Violent crimes, violating the #Rights of others, rioting, burning, looting must be punished so that criminals (and everyone else) are clearly given the message that they will be held to account for their chosen behavior.
Folks on the left believe that authority devolves from the state, that individuals must sacrifice their #Liberty “for the greater good”.
Those on the right believe that authority comes from the People, that they best know how to make their lives better, how to pursue happiness. They believe that government exists solely to protect their most fundamental Rights, among them, #Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. When government takes an action that does not protect Rights, it is overstepping its bounds.
To put these ideas on a spectrum in a way that is not arbitrary (most spectra are drawn arbitrarily to push a political ideology), we must employ a variable, just as the electro-magnetic spectrum employs frequency or wavelength.
The variable that best distinguishes left and right is the amount of Liberty a particular ideology allows the People.
Starting from the right (Liberty) and proceeding left (authoritarianism), I propose the following ordering of ideologies:
True anarchy, libertarianism, American conservatism, Madisonianism, American liberalism, socialism, progressivism, tyranny (including communism, naziism, and fascism).
True anarchy refers to zero government, not to the attempt to tear down an existing government (usually to replace it with a leftist government).
American conservatism is not the same as the conservatism that attempts to preserve an authoritarian state. It is not the same thing as conservatism during the American War of Independence, the French Revolution, or during the communist regime in the USSR. American conservatism seeks to conserve the ideals of the Founders and Framers.
Madisonians trust in the precise balance of Liberty of the People and authority of the state that Madison envisioned when he authored the #Constitution. We value the vertical (federalism, invented by our Framers) and horizontal (the three branches) separation of powers. We feel that our government has strayed from these principles, usurping power it never was intended to possess.
Progressivism and fascism both hold that the state is the ultimate authority and that the people should be willing to cede Liberty, the only real difference being the willingness to shoot non-compilers.
This is my take. Accept it or not. But is does explain leftist better than anything else I have encountered.
BREAKING: NYC agrees to pay BLM "protesters" who were arrested or allegedly brutalized $13 million or about $10k per protester.
In March, a similar lawsuit resulted in 300 BLM protesters getting $20k each.
BLM "protesters" destroyed 450+ businesses in NYC.
https://t.co/YYRbHaazZx