@images_ai When it is created by an algorithms I think it takes away from the meaning that many try to derive from art. Sure, the "composer" may have had meaning behind their prompt, but most derive more emotion from the prompt than the art because the prompt was generated by a fellow human
@images_ai If I write chord changes, and someone shreds over those changes, I didn't write their improvisations. I wrote the foundation and then deserve some credit, but not all of it.
@images_ai Didn't see this reply!
If I tell an artist in great detail what to create, and then they create it, I don't consider myself the artist of that painting. Sure, I was the inspiration, but not the artist. Same thing with jazz improv (1/2)
@images_ai In compositions by Cage, Young, and the like, they may have written words that are quite though provoking, but the art that they create is the intended performance.
Not sure if that makes sense, and I'd love to see how you respond since I think this is an nteresting topic.
@images_ai I'm aware of the counterexamples, honestly I think they are fascinating (check out Lamonte Young if you haven't already).
I just think that in writing an AI Prompt, the art that YOU created is the prompt itself. No different than writing a poem or short story. (1/2)
@images_ai What does a jazz piece have to do with developing a writing prompt? Writing one of those is vastly different than an AI image prompt in 99.9% of cases. The avant garde piece you cite is certainly an edge case, and the performance is still so different than writing an image prompt
WORLD CHAMPION ‼️ WORLD RECORD ‼️ SYDNEY MCLAUGHLIN 🤯
OLYMPIC CHAMPION @GoSydGo 🇺🇸 DESTROYS HER OWN WORLD RECORD IN 5⃣0⃣.6⃣8⃣ TO CLAIM WORLD 400M HURDLES GOLD 🥇
#WorldAthleticsChamps
@PaulPt79 @NicolaDiamond1 @AthleticsWeekly@DevonAllen13 I definitely agree that the 0.1 rule is BS. But there does get to a point where if you move fast enough after the gun, then you false started based on the limitations of human reaction. The number shouldn't be 0.100, but it shouldn't be 0.000 either.
Marc Minichello of @PennTrack wins the javelin with a PR mark of 81.05m (265-11). Minichello is the first male athlete from Penn to capture the javelin crown since Brian Chaput in 2003.
@whatsthecraic1@MJGold My view is that the one false start in your done rule is to prevent people from trying to get lucky with their starts. If the first false start resulted in a warning, then I guarantee that almost every sprint race would have false starts.
@ArthurDickerson@Part4 I guess its because the sub-4 mile and the sub-10 100m are both similarly hallowed marks, seen as a pinnacle of achievement in their sport, and therefore get the same attention. I think its important to glorify performances as necessary, and 100m runners are getting overlooked.