A lot of men want to be treated like a provider while living like a roommate.
They want 50/50 when the bill comes, but ‘head of the house’ when respect is involved. They want her to carry the planning, the cooking, the remembering, the appointments, the emotional regulation, and then also act like he’s the best thing that ever happened to her.
You can’t ask for king treatment when you’re not building a kingdom. If she has to manage you, she can’t depend on you.
Your sophomoric "gotcha" collapses under the weight of its own intellectual frailty the moment it leaves your keyboard.
You haven't uncovered some profound paradox...you've merely exposed the depth of your own detachment from biological reality.
Sex is binary because mammalian reproduction is binary.
Full stop.
There are exactly two gamete types...sperm and ova...and exactly two developmental pathways organized around producing one or the other.
No third gamete exists.
No third pathway exists.
Disorders of sexual development are deviations from one of those two norms, not evidence of a spectrum.
This isn't "social regulation."
This is developmental biology so fundamental that a fruit fly gets it right without legislation.
Babies recognize male and female faces within hours of birth.
Non-verbal toddlers sort by sex before they can speak.
Primates, birds, and reptiles navigate sex categories without human rights campaigns or pride flags.
No laws are required to "maintain" the binary because the binary is the substrate of sexual reproduction itself.
Gravity doesn't need a Ministry of Downward Force; sex doesn't need a Department of Binary Compliance.
The "social regulation and energy" you're hallucinating isn't being spent to prop up the binary...it's being spent to defend material reality against a ideological assault that demands we all pretend men can be women.
The laws you're screeching about aren't forcing particles to obey gravity; they're stopping ideologues from forcing women to share prisons, rape shelters, and sports with male bodies.
The "engineering" is coming from your side: chemical castration of confused children, double mastectomies on healthy breasts, lifelong medicalization for a psychological condition with sky-high desistance rates if left alone.
Neurologically, the human brain is sexually dimorphic from the second trimester onward.
The male fetus receives a testosterone bath that enlarges the amygdala, thickens the right hemisphere, sculpts the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis...BNST...a structure so reliably larger in males that it was used to distinguish male from female brains in autopsy studies long before anyone cared about trans politics.
Female brains show different connectivity patterns in the corpus callosum, different gray-white matter ratios, different hypothalamic responses.
These differences are organizational...permanent, hard-wired by prenatal hormones...and they drive average behavioral dimorphism in everything from spatial rotation to emotional processing.
Trans-identifying individuals often show brain patterns that deviate from their sex, but crucially, those patterns align with distress and body dysmorphia, not with the opposite sex's typical architecture.
The "female brain in a male body" claim is neurological fan fiction.
Gender dysphoria is a psychological condition with known comorbidities...autism, trauma, cluster B traits...and it resolves in 80-90% of cases with puberty and time.
Your movement's solution is to arrest puberty, flood developing brains with cross-sex hormones, and carve up healthy bodies instead of treating the mind.
That's not liberation.
That's conversion therapy for gender nonconformity with scalpels and syringes.
So spare us the faux-profound gravity analogy.
Gravity doesn't have an activist lobby demanding we identify as anti-gravitational and punish anyone who notices objects fall.
Sex does...because your ideology requires constant, coercive enforcement to override the most basic observable reality humans have ever known.
You're not asking a question transphobes "can't answer."
You're regurgitating a rhetorical sleight-of-hand so flimsy it wouldn't survive a high-school biology quiz.
Grow the fuck up.
Reality isn't transphobic.
It's just real.
🧠
@acysbib@Hitchslap1 @nextlevelpsych I’m in the 99.74 percentile… Tried with multiple different ones and it went all kinds of wrong. They wouldn’t even understand the questions.
I concur… Never happening.
Should you set up a holding company?
I’ve seen people do this when they shouldn’t.
And I’ve seen people who should have done this earlier.
So we created a framework.
It asks 5 questions to determine if you should set one up.
Article in the next tweet
@libriscent It’s not an overreaction, it’s a backlog.
By the time she’s angry, she’s already tried patience, silence, and grace. This is what happens when being quiet is mistaken for being okay.
I need every man to understand this: Your woman's anger is rarely about what just happened. It's about the 47 times before this that she stayed quiet. It's the accumulation of every small dismissal she swallowed to keep the peace. When she finally explodes, she's not overreacting because she's actually been under-responding for months.
Autistic people needing extra time alone to recharge, rejuvenate and recover from sensory overload and overstimulation is valid and does not mean we are being dramatic, disinterested, rude, or stuck-up.
@Autistic_Lauren Everyone is either a plant by default. A decoration basically. So you’re either a plant or, once I’ve adopted you, you’re family.
Needless to say I don’t grasp social rules at all 😂
You call her toxic now.
But you met her when she was kind, open, and trusting. Before the lies. Before the betrayal. Before she had to protect herself from you. She became guarded because you kept hurting her.
She became reactive because you kept crossing lines. She became tired because she kept choosing you while you chose yourself. That wasn't toxicity. That was damage.
And expecting her to stay soft after everything you put her through is the real denial. You didn't lose a good woman. You changed her, then blamed her for the result.
You broke her trust, you bruised her heart, and now you're shocked she's not the same person you fell for.
Newsflash: she's not the one who's changed; your perspective has. You're seeing the effects of your actions and calling it her problem.
She's not toxic; she's wounded.
And instead of owning up to the hurt you caused, you're gaslighting her into thinking she's the flawed one.
Own it. You hurt someone who loved you, and now she's protecting herself from further pain.
That's not toxicity; that's self-preservation.
And if you can't see the damage you've done, that's on you.
@RealSpitfire@9mmsmg They are sociopaths. They literally cut people open for a living. So as long as they cut good … no more can be expected of them lol