🚨🔥SHOCKING EXPOSURE: RFK JUST SAID IT..
THE “CONSPIRACY THEORISTS” WERE RIGHT ALL ALONG — ABOUT EVERYTHING. UNREAL. BOOOM! [VIDEO]
🚨 🔥 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has detonated a political earthquake by confirming that the so-called “conspiracy theories” about COVID, chemical trails, and government deception were not theories at all — they were the cold, hard truth, deliberately hidden from the public.
🚨🔥 THE MOMENT THE LIES COLLAPSED
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
You guys are some of the dumbest people in the world to not consider that I’ve been sitting on Charlie’s Aspen video for the last 7 months. I am light years ahead of you toothless cogs who deserve nothing but the resentment you have earned from the entire world.
Since you are now shamelessly attempting to use an out of context text from 2021 to pretend that Charlie wanted to change the event from the YOUNG Women’s Leadership conference to a BoomerCon NagFest, here is the relevant portion from his Aspen donor event, (captured just 3 weeks before he died) where he carefully laid out his vision for the organization for over 2 hours. Please note Charlie’s explanation that the past and future vision was for YOUNG women to gather at YWLS.
…But I’m sure he changed his mind a week later, right?
What happened to President Trump?
From the Iran war to the Epstein files, to MAHA & mass deportations- what explains all of the reversals?
It is critical that we look past the emotions & ask the hard questions, because the answers will tell us who truly runs our nation.
Humans come in all shapes and sizes. Some are intelligent, some are stupid and some are genuinely malicious. People disagree about politics, religion, morality, and almost everything else, but there is one principle every sane person should understand: when someone is being attacked from every direction, especially by people they never attacked in the first place, you should at least stop and ask why? What is going on here?
If I punch someone in the face and they punch me back, the responsibility starts with me because I initiated the conflict. That is simple cause and effect. But if random groups of people suddenly start attacking me when I never attacked them in the first place and their only justification is that I questioned an organization or its leadership because I believe they are not being fully honest then any rational person should immediately start asking questions.
Why are these people so emotionally invested? Are they ideologically driven, financially motivated, coordinated behind the scenes, or simply acting in the interests of the same network of people? Otherwise, why would they aggressively attack someone who never attacked them personally? Especially in a country where personal conflict is avoided like the plague and passive-aggressiveness is in fashion. Why would they deliberately seek out personal conflict when they seemingly have no dog in the fight?
That is basic logic. So why is Candace Owens being attacked by people she never attacked? Even someone with minimal common sense should be asking that question. And this is after she was fired, her friend was killed and somehow she’s the one attacked for what exactly?
Having a show in which she asks questions most Americans would like to ask the leadership of this country? Is that what triggers these people? The answer is - YES! They are triggered by people who ask difficult questions.
Why would a popular host like her, someone Americans genuinely enjoy listening to and support (a fact based on numbers), be attacked by a handful of weird individuals in a very coordinated manner? Popularity and public support are measured by numbers, and numbers usually reflect one important metric: honesty! Ben Shapiro learned that the hard way. So why is it that a host who is so obviously supported by the public still gets relentlessly attacked by certain people?
Their excuse is always the same: “Erika Kirk was attacked, so now we’re attacking Candace.” Suddenly the same people who excuse corruption, hypocrisy, defend genocide in Gaza and institutional failure at every opportunity have discovered a moral conscience overnight. Now they present themselves as noble defenders of justice and protectors of Erika Kirk.
Amazing! Candace Owens apparently performs miracles. She somehow transformed some of the worlds’ most cynical and self-interested people into passionate warriors for morality and for this widow Erika! People who would normally destroy others for the sake of self-preservation and have done so before, are suddenly deeply concerned about someone else’s well-being.
Or maybe the explanation is far simpler: these people are connected, coordinated, and protecting the same interests behind the scenes, the same entrenched elites. That explanation makes far more sense doesn't it?
Let’s be clear about something important: Candace Owens did not accuse anyone of murder. She asked questions and tried to connect the dots when nothing made sense. That is all. And I have to say she is much nicer than I am. If someone murder my best friend and then some group of people started attacking me for wanting to find out what happened to my friend - asking questions and connecting the dots would be the least of their worries. I'm not as nice as Candace.
Candace Owens never accused Brian Harpole of killing Charlie Kirk, at least not to my knowledge, yet Brian Harpole is suing her for defamation. Defamation means making false statements that damage someone’s reputation. Brian Are you sure it was Candace who damaged your reputation? Or maybe it had something to do with your shortcomings when the person you were protecting was killed? Maybe that’s when people started seeing you as an incompetent ass?
So where/what exactly was the false statement Candace made? Asking whether security failed at an event where the person being protected ended up dead is that the statement? That can not possibly be ground for defamation, it is a completely reasonable question because security failed Charlie is dead!!!
What was Brian Harpole’s job? His job was to protect Charlie Kirk. Was Charlie Kirk protected that day? No. Charlie Kirk is dead. You f***g moron you and entire team miserably failed at your jobs that is why Charlie is dead. That is not an opinion. That is an undeniable fact the guy you were supposed to protect is dead! Or maybe we are missing something and you were not tasked with Charlie's protection at all? Maybe you were there to dance ballet before the event even started. I don’t know, am I missing something here? please educate us!
If the person you were assigned to protect dies under your watch, then the security failed. PERIOD! That failure may not mean murder, but he is dead because of the failure! That is true in every country, every language, and every functioning reality!
And this is where the lawsuit becomes absurd. A man whose protection team failed and got Charlie killed is now suing a podcaster because she questioned whether security at the event was handled properly. Think about how irrational that is.
Brian, if you ever wanted to restore credibility or be taken seriously again professionally, as a body guard the correct action would have been very different. You should have gone on Shawn Ryan’s show and apologized to the American people and to Charlie’s family for the failures in security detail that day. That is what accountability looks like.
Instead, you chose lawsuits and public attacks. And now, rather than being remembered as someone who took responsibility after a tragedy, you will be remembered as the bodyguard who failed at his job and then sued one of Charlie’s friends for questioning it. That is the legacy you are creating for yourself.
Guys, imagine for a second what would happen if Russia or China paid millions to sway the vote for a candidate in the primaries? People would go bonkers. But when it’s Israel somehow it’s ok. We have a new breed of fascism in the world and the center of it is - Israel! This fake entity is a perfect example of how the abused can become the abuser!
Until someone explains this to me, I will never believe the official narrative about Charlie Kirk’s murder and I will continue to believe that they took him out because of the threat he was to them and everything they are doing right now.
Literally everything… Supporting lsraeI, lran, reglme change, the Epsteln coverup, foreign aid, the Maga cult loyalists attacking people like Massie and Trump supporting people like Lindsey Graham…. ALL OF IT.
But I’m just a conspiracy theorist.
In honor of Candace Owens saying that Mike McCoy told her to look more into Andrew Kolvet, you may enjoy the 2 part deep dive I did on him back in March. Includes his family ties, his placement inside TPUSA by Johnnie Moore, who now sits on the board of ADL, who led the "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" before is it was shut down for heinous crimes and taking covert dark money from our fave country "allegedly". Anyway, did this March 28 and at that time I thought he was a big part of....well, everything.
Go to my substack (link in bio) and scroll down to March 28 and March 29 for Parts 1 and 2. Enjoy!
⚠️Questions remain about Charlie Kirk’s death • Digging deeper into Kirk’s assassination • Stellar insight: Brig. Gen. Blaine Holt @the_irascible, Rob O’Neill, @RobFinnertyUSA@NEWSMAX
This documentary is essential viewing for anyone that wants to understand Netanyahu, the situation in Israel before Oct 7th and why Bibi had to start endless war to save his own corrupt skin.
It’s a masterpiece. Awesome of Tucker to help distribute it as it had been pulled by Amazon.
Something that I think about often is how Turning Point opened Amfest with an alleged audio of Charlie saying he wanted Erika to take over the organization if anything happened to him.
Why won’t they release the video?
Surely, if they captured the audio they have the video.
If you all of a sudden think Tucker, Candace, Alex Jones, Shawn Ryan, Megyn Kelly, Marjorie Taylor Greene, etc. are anti American traitors, then you are a victim of the pro Israel psyop.