@HN_Schlottman Great image. Nitpick though: should have a solid background on the text boxes. Easier to read without city/country names behind blocks of text
@rloewe65@proudCanadavet Exactly, though I'd expect the investigation by the ICJ to potentially include the seizure of Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhia, however. Whether Russia is still a signatory to the additional protocols or not, due to the risks to civilians and infrastructure.
Per the Geneva Convention (12 August 1949), Article 56 subsection 1: Attacking a nuclear power facility is a violation of the Geneva convention. https://t.co/tYiGfwndd3
Incoming 🧵 by Matthew Bunn, the James R. Schlesinger Professor of the Practice of Energy, National Security, and Foreign Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School (and PI of Managing the Atom): (1/x)
What I am unsure of is this: why attack Zaporizhzhia NPP at all? If the goal is to simply cut power, the Russian forces could have just neutralized the two substations.
@ArmsControlWonk The camera is on the Laboratory building behind administration, it was just zoomed in to crop out the foreground buildings. Though, the feed is offline now.
@Kenindfw @ArmsControlWonk Right. And it looks like per this tweet by James Acton, 3 of 3 were in some form of operation and connected to the grid while the other 3 were in some form of shutdown.
https://t.co/g95mffXcwU
Short thread on the dangers of the fire at Zaporizhzhya NPP.
As of 8am this morning, according to Ukraine's regulator, three of six reactors were connected to the grid; the other three were offline. However, ALL the units will need cooling if they have any fuel inside. (1/n)