jenclar65

Mad about my horse, husband and daughters (in no particular order!)

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

Follow the Money: Pandemic Fearmongering is a Growth Industry https://t.co/Vx4MTypPSN via @LD_Sceptics

[Julie Comyn @Jools137]

@benonwine Well if it’s not ‘safe’ or ‘secure’ for them to be in it then the same applies to us. No to Digital ID!

[Michelle Dewberry @MichelleDewbs]

Look at the state of this🤦🏼‍♀️

Describing this man as a ‘woman’, talking about ‘her penis’ etc🤢

@barrydistrict you should be embarrassed.

Btw, these are the kinds of men that people like @EmilyThornberry want to be allowed to share a female single-sex space with women & little girls

Full story: https://t.co/FDnjykK77u

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

@benonwine @RoyalFamily if this is so important tell me why you aren’t included. And don’t cry “security”

[Benonwine @benonwine]

So let me get this ABSOLUTELY straight…

The public are being told facial recognition cameras, Digital ID and eventually digital currency are all about “security” and “safety”.

Meaning every payment, every document and every movement could one day be linked directly back to YOU.

But here’s the part hardly anyone talks about…

MPs and members of the Royal Family are reportedly exempt from parts of Digital ID systems for “security reasons”.

So the very people creating and supporting these systems won’t necessarily have to live under them in the same way as everyone else.

Ordinary people could end up being monitored through one vast digital network, while those at the top remain outside parts of it.

Whether you support Digital ID or oppose it, surely the same rules should apply to everyone.

Because the moment people believe there is one set of rules for MPs, the Royal Family and the political class, and another for everybody else, trust in government starts to disappear.

And looking around Britain today, it’s not hard to see why so many people are losing faith.

The real issue isn’t technology. It’s whether the people creating the system are willing to live under it themselves and if they aren’t then WHY and WHY should anyone else be expected to then.

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

White People Blocked From Jobseeker Schemes https://t.co/M65R8LuHJX via @LD_Sceptics

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

The fact that the Labour government is trying to ring-fence the entire population with digital ID surveillance and control is a grotesque abuse of power. No one voted for this. They are supposed to be public servants rather than Orwellian authoritarians.

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

@connor_naismith Not so keen on protecting the childhoods of Pakistani rape gang victims though! Hypocrite & liar - this is all about digital control of adults. Why is BlueSky exempt? Are you ok with your girls mixing with paedophiles so long as it’s a leftie site?

[Jill Foster @JournalistJill]

This is ‘Paula’. Every one of the 130 MPs who signed the EDM to reject the guidance on single sex spaces in the UK wants men like Paula to be allowed in female-only facilities.

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

British Taxpayers Have Been Charged £660 Million in the Last Five Years on Woke Research About Asylum Seekers https://t.co/Dyu546TK53 via @LD_Sceptics

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

Bristol’s SS Great Britain Museum Renamed ‘Bristol Dockyards’ https://t.co/wGfjbHWe9x via @LD_Sceptics More erasure of our history on the altar of wokeism

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

This is @Kier_Starmer the lying, hypocritical current occupant of @10DowningStreet

[Keith 🇬🇧 @LonsdaleKeith]

You're not banning access to Bluesky, which hosts paedophiles and other sexual deviants. You were involved in making sure paedophiles were treated leniently by the courts. You defended Saville and covered up the rape of tens of thousands of vulnerable British girls by Pakistani Muslim gangs. You appointed a known paedophile associate to our most prestigious ambassadorship and an actual paedophile to the Lords.
One would be forgiven for suspecting that you are yourself a nonce.

[Valentina Gomez @ValentinaForUSA]

@Keir_Starmer A 16 year old can join the military but social media is too dangerous?

This is about control, not about protecting children.

If you actually cared about kids you’d arrest the rapists muslims

[Mary Harrington @moveincircles]

@Keir_Starmer Everyone knows this is just about ending anonymity online, for everyone

Stop pretending you care about kids, if you did you'd roll up the gang networks that have captured multiple Labour cities and are pimping our children up and down the country

[Christian Patriot ✝️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @unitethewest]

@Keir_Starmer Thank you Keir Jong Un, what would we do without being forced to upload our photo ID so your glorious leadership can monitor who we are and what we post.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

@Keir_Starmer We know what you're doing. You're using "child safety" as a Trojan horse for device-level digital ID infrastructure.

https://t.co/vvQKIIXSie

[Ben Graham @BenGrahamUK]

@Keir_Starmer Labour whipped their MPs to vote against a rape gang inquiry, after thousands of British children got raped by foreign gangs over the last decade.

You don't care about child safety, it's about controlling the British public.

[jenclar65 @JennieRodger]

Why no ban here @Kier_Starmer @10DowningStreet ? What have you got to hide?

[Botticelli@ @Botticelli43512]

@Keir_Starmer But NOT BluSky because that exactly the pedo network🥴You cannot make this 💩up can you ..Minor attracted people are just fcking fine 🤦‍♀️

[@ChatsWithEm @chatswithem]

Starmer banning access to social media - Yet allows the continued access to far left social media site BlueSky - linked to many extremely concerning accounts

"Bluesky has faced a rising influx of Child Sexual Abuse Material ( CSAM) and predator activity " ( Internet watch)

This isn't about protecting kids

It's about controlling the messaging - and the truths Kids can see.

And digital ID

Starmer isn't banning knives and clamping down on extreme violence
He isn't stopping the boats of illegal unkown men
He isn't banning IRGC from the Uk
He isn't clamping down on relentless anti British activity by China
He isn't clamping down on grooming gangs
He isn't clamping down on climate hysteria causing anxiety to kids
He isn't stopping punitive DEI measures limiting opportunity for kids

He's focused on controlling the information you can see

You're a very concerning individual Starmer and more and more people are realising that