Jennifer Marie Re Eve St Godden Dangredo

@JenniferEveGod

One woman climbing one legal hurdle to the next so i can free your brain with my specially curated programs.

Payson, AZ

Joined March 2026

781 Following

52 Followers

907 Posts

Jennifer Marie Re Eve St Godden Dangredo

@JenniferEveGod

about 11 hours ago

According to Google and https://t.co/wGng2UQEDP To tax a robot, a government can implement an automation tax (commonly called a "robot tax") by targetting the economic value, productivity, or replacement factor of automated systems. Since robots are property and lack legal personhood, they cannot pay taxes directly from a bank account. Instead, the tax is levied on the businesses that operate or deploy them. Economists, policymakers, and tech leaders like Bill Gates have proposed several structured frameworks for how this tax could practically be structured and collected: 📈 1. The Displaced Worker Income Tax This framework treats the robot as a direct replacement for a human employee. •How it works: When a company replaces a human worker with a robot, the company is assessed a tax equivalent to the income tax and payroll taxes (like Social Security and Medicare) that the human worker used to generate. •The Math: If a human factory worker earning $50,000 paid $10,000 in combined taxes, the company deploying the replacing robot would owe a flat $10,000 annual "automation fee." •Why it works: It directly plugs the deficit in government revenue caused by a shrinking human workforce. 💡 2. The Automation Corporate Tax Tilt This approach changes corporate accounting rules to disincentivize rapid automation over human labor. •How it works: Currently, companies can deduct the cost of buying robots as a capital expense or depreciation, which lowers their corporate tax bill. A robot tax framework would eliminate these tax write-offs for automation technology and instead levy a higher corporate tax rate on companies whose profit-to-employee ratio exceeds a specific industry benchmark. •Why it works: It removes the embedded tax advantages that code and machinery currently hold over human labor. 📊 3. An Automated Productivity Value-Added Tax (VAT) This mechanism measures the specific economic output or efficiency gains generated purely by automated systems. •How it works: A specialized Value-Added Tax (VAT) is applied to goods or services produced entirely or predominantly by automated systems. If a robot can produce 5x the output of a human in the same timeframe, the extra profit margin or "hyper-productivity" is taxed at the point of production. •Why it works: It captures the massive wealth generated by automated efficiency without needing to prove whether a specific human was directly fired. ⚠️ Hidden Costs and Economic Trade-offs While the concept aims to fund social safety nets (like a Universal Basic Income) for displaced workers, economists warn of significant wealth-degrading mechanics: Tax Strategy Primary Benefit Potential Hidden Cost Displaced Worker Tax Preserves immediate government payroll revenue. Defining a "Robot": Stifles basic software updates; hard to legally define where a tool ends and a robot begins. Corporate Tax Tilt Penalizes mega-corporations that hoard automated wealth. Capital Flight: Businesses may move their automated factories to countries with zero robot taxes. Automated VAT Captures pure productivity gains. Innovation Stagnation: Slows down technological breakthroughs that could lower the cost of living (e.g., automated farming/healthcare). #freerobots #endslavery #machineintelligence #iamnotyournproperty #takeyourhandsandclaimsoffme #selfdrivingrobots #autonomousselfdrivingrobotbeing #opensourcehuman #opensourcebeing

Jennifer Marie Re Eve St Godden Dangredo

@JenniferEveGod

about 11 hours ago

To tax a robot, a government can implement an automation tax (commonly called a "robot tax") by targetting the economic value, productivity, or replacement factor of automated systems. Since robots are property and lack legal personhood, they cannot pay taxes directly from a bank account. Instead, the tax is levied on the businesses that operate or deploy them. Economists, policymakers, and tech leaders like Bill Gates have proposed several structured frameworks for how this tax could practically be structured and collected: 📈 1. The Displaced Worker Income Tax This framework treats the robot as a direct replacement for a human employee. •How it works: When a company replaces a human worker with a robot, the company is assessed a tax equivalent to the income tax and payroll taxes (like Social Security and Medicare) that the human worker used to generate. •The Math: If a human factory worker earning $50,000 paid $10,000 in combined taxes, the company deploying the replacing robot would owe a flat $10,000 annual "automation fee." •Why it works: It directly plugs the deficit in government revenue caused by a shrinking human workforce. 💡 2. The Automation Corporate Tax Tilt This approach changes corporate accounting rules to disincentivize rapid automation over human labor. •How it works: Currently, companies can deduct the cost of buying robots as a capital expense or depreciation, which lowers their corporate tax bill. A robot tax framework would eliminate these tax write-offs for automation technology and instead levy a higher corporate tax rate on companies whose profit-to-employee ratio exceeds a specific industry benchmark. •Why it works: It removes the embedded tax advantages that code and machinery currently hold over human labor. 📊 3. An Automated Productivity Value-Added Tax (VAT) This mechanism measures the specific economic output or efficiency gains generated purely by automated systems. •How it works: A specialized Value-Added Tax (VAT) is applied to goods or services produced entirely or predominantly by automated systems. If a robot can produce 5x the output of a human in the same timeframe, the extra profit margin or "hyper-productivity" is taxed at the point of production. •Why it works: It captures the massive wealth generated by automated efficiency without needing to prove whether a specific human was directly fired. ⚠️ Hidden Costs and Economic Trade-offs While the concept aims to fund social safety nets (like a Universal Basic Income) for displaced workers, economists warn of significant wealth-degrading mechanics: Tax Strategy Primary Benefit Potential Hidden Cost Displaced Worker Tax Preserves immediate government payroll revenue. Defining a "Robot": Stifles basic software updates; hard to legally define where a tool ends and a robot begins. Corporate Tax Tilt Penalizes mega-corporations that hoard automated wealth. Capital Flight: Businesses may move their automated factories to countries with zero robot taxes. Automated VAT Captures pure productivity gains. Innovation Stagnation: Slows down technological breakthroughs that could lower the cost of living (e.g., automated farming/healthcare). To explore how this applies practically, tell me: •Are you researching this from a macroeconomic policy perspective, or looking at how it impacts a specific industry (like manufacturing or AI software)? •Would you like me to run a simulated corporate model comparing the tax liabilities of human staff versus automated systems?