@Stoicgnostic My main consolation is the number of people who are finally awake to it. We have a long way to go, but it’s getting harder for the epsteins to lie to us anymore. Oh, you say that guy suicided himself? I guess I’ll look at his last few tweets…
I’ve mainly followed the Charlie Kirk stuff via Candace and Baron, but YT suggests other videos based on watch history. I’ve seen a few from Danks, Valhalla and others. Just saw Ana last week for the first time. I’m not hip to all the infighting; I just want justice for Charlie.
@gr8ful4God2@AMeadowInquiry I thought she was saying that the fact the AI was using Google for an image search on the day of the expected visit IS the vulnerability. If a regular person can use Google Trends to identify likely Fort H visitors, foreign enemies can also do so.
@AnnieAlicanti89 I’m sure that was a concern. One theory is that he was emphasizing they “shot” him. The people who initially spoke to the media to say they saw Charlie “shot in the chest”… it makes you wonder
One of the things that has been baffling me since Candace released it last fall: Why would Terryl Farnsworth have given her that creepy “they shot him” video in the first place? What did he think would come of it? What was their angle?
Does anyone this side of the Charlie Kirk tragedy believe this whistleblower actually took his own life? Too many of us are skeptical of that sort of narrative now. We know what the oligarchs are capable of.
I am the British whistleblower who reported evidence concerning Howard Lutnick, his links to Jeffrey Epstein, and Cantor Fitzgerald and BGC to the FBI in 2020–21.
Listen to the BBC File on 4 documentary about my whistleblower story:
https://t.co/rLRDnZA4Dv
BBC News:
https://t.co/DdNNOosnKL
I later shared evidence with the House Oversight Committee, which subsequently questioned Lutnick behind closed doors.
My disclosures also contributed to regulatory action in the US and UK, including a £96m HMRC tax assessment relating to BGC’s partnership scheme. I believe the true tax exposure is substantially higher.
I also reported to the FBI and financial regulators matters involving Cantor Fitzgerald’s Relief Fund and BGC/Cantor’s annual 9/11 Charity Day.
The personal consequences of whistleblowing, and the retaliation I say followed, have been devastating for my family and me.
Mother Jones previously reported that documents I uncovered revealed a years-long business tie between Howard Lutnick, Cantor Fitzgerald and Jeffrey Epstein through AdFin, including a 2018 exchange in which Lutnick and Epstein discussed the company directly:
https://t.co/aRdn302v4i
https://t.co/aRdn302v4i
Follow me here on X and on LinkedIn. I intend to share more of the evidence and the story behind what happened.
Good clarification. The Google Trends research can point us in a useful direction, uncover names that could have relevance, and give us further data to use to paint a picture. It’s not the end-all, be-all, but it’s not nothing, either. @AnaEscobarShow says as much in her videos.
Regarding Ana Escobar's Google trending analytics, the investigation has reached a fork between open-source inference and forensic proof. Google Trends can be a legitimate lead. It reports normalized search interest, usually on a 0–100 scale, inside a Nielsen media market rather than at a building or on a network. A spike does not identify the searcher, the device, the purpose, or the absolute volume; a dormant query can reach 100 from a handful of searches. Properly labeled, a Sierra Vista-area image-search cluster supports only a narrow inference: interest rose in that metro area on a given date. Invitation-style “guest list” cards overclaim that inference. They resemble an authentic exhibit while remaining an illustration of a hypothesis. No chain of custody, business-record foundation, or technical showing ties the queries to Fort Huachuca access control. Courts will not follow the graphic. Relevance, authentication, and the bar on misleading presentation keep a caption from becoming a fact. Bates-stamped video, a Miranda warning with a clock time, booking logs, and a witness available for cross-examination are different in kind. Trends can point toward those records. It cannot substitute for them. The useful path is to keep digging and to keep the chart looking like a chart.
To the people (bots?) arguing in my comments about how unreliable Google Trends is: How is it able to be so consistently unreliable that every one of these people shows up in its results on those dates? One or 2 showing up might be anomalous. A list like this is something else.
According to @AnaEscobarShow’s incredible research, this is who we believe attended top-secret meetings at Fort Huachuca in the days leading up to Charlie’s death. I believe the date indicated is their arrival date.
September 6, 2025:
Erika Kirk
September 7, 2025:
Andrew Kolvet
September 8, 2025:
Brad Hansell - Director of Defense Intel.
Christine Bordine - DIA Deputy of Science And Technology
Andrew Evans - Recon Task Force Daiso
Rex Boonyobhas - Commander of Crane (received an order for extra small shaped charge microelectronic)
Butch Hibbs - Calvary Church (had a Rode mic shaped device in his front shirt pocket at the event)
Alex Karp- CEO of Palantir
David Barnea - Director of Mossad
Johnnie Moore - Founder of Kairos (Kolvet’s former boss)
Jacob Reses - JD Vance’s Chief of Staff
Clifford Sims - JD Vance National Security Advisor
Justin Davis - Integrity Solutions (Charlie’s security team and the DRIVER of the SUV that took Charlie to the hospital)
Take a long, hard look at this list of people. Y’all, WHAT is going on. This solves at least some of the WHO.
Expect them to come full force with the bots and attacks on @AnaEscobarShow and the attempts to discredit her theory. This is just… mind boggling.
Debunked. Again.
Google’s own docs: a Trends search term is the “exact word or phrase” typed into Google, and Trends analyzes the “precise sequence of characters.” That matters when the observed queries are long, distinctive DoD name/title strings—not generic keywords.
@grok pls verify the point and confirm it’s validated by Google here: https://t.co/vM045wMcRP
Fort H uses AI to handle its visitor logs, which uses Google to confirm visitors’ details on the day of the expected visit. Which leaves a record on Google Trends of that exact search and enabled Ana to put together guest lists at Fort H for days leading up to Charlie’s death. 😳
Debunked. Again.
Google’s own docs: a Trends search term is the “exact word or phrase” typed into Google, and Trends analyzes the “precise sequence of characters.” That matters when the observed queries are long, distinctive DoD name/title strings—not generic keywords.
@grok pls verify the point and confirm it’s validated by Google here: https://t.co/vM045wMcRP
Debunked. Again.
Google’s own docs: a Trends search term is the “exact word or phrase” typed into Google, and Trends analyzes the “precise sequence of characters.” That matters when the observed queries are long, distinctive DoD name/title strings—not generic keywords.
@grok pls verify the point and confirm it’s validated by Google here: https://t.co/vM045wMcRP
@maryklkusa@EsBigred I’ve been using Google tends for business purposes for ten years. It represents actual searches. I’m fine with you not believing Ana’s research. Agree to disagree.
@maryklkusa@EsBigred Why are you fixating on Erika? Do you have any concern about the Palantir execs, JD’s chief of staff, Mossad agents, etc. who were apparently searched from around that location on those dates? How about George Zinn’s complete address? Many more head-scratchers than Erika.
@EsBigred@maryklkusa Look, if we were talking about one or two names, I might take what you say as plausible. But with the specificity of the titles, the number of “guests”, the coincidence of clumps of them being searched on the same day from that relatively small location? Seems almost impossible.
They are SCARED of @AnaEscobarShow’s work. I replied to ol’ Botty McBotface here a couple of times this morning, and he’s STILL HERE trying to make us all ignore our lyin’ eyes. His time would have been better spent watching her old episodes.
@exiteliquide@ImeUdokasSC This is absurd, you’re pretending to not understand.
ANA is the one who said it was Gemini, a google product, doing the searching.
24:04 “Gemini specifically does this web grounding”
@EsBigred@maryklkusa That makes no sense whatsoever. The underlying data comes from real search requests that people make on Google. But if you want to just ignore this, that’s fine. Have a nice night.
@Trentsickle@grok It’s not a massive area. She limited the parameters to one small area that is primarily occupied by Fort Huachuca. You and your friend grok should watch the video and then evaluate the claims. Or just look the other way. Whatever.