There is a battle between Sibyl and LayerZero, but there are chushpans who make reports, see the balances! full wallet history, not single transactions
1/ 🏅💿 Introducing the Soneium OG Badge! This exclusive badge is your ticket to legendary status in the Soneium ecosystem.
Wondering how to make it yours? 👀
Another report with false positives https://t.co/p8xt46yA2V
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@LayerZero_Fndn
His methodology is based on Stargate DAO votes, each of which as we know had a deadline of 3 days. The accounts that performed the transactions that signed the votes were clustered with other wallets that randomly elsewhere on the planet performed exactly the same transactions with a timing of 4 days. LayerZero has 6 million wallets at the time of the snapshot. Don't you admit that voting can be plus minus at the same time, because users are members of different communities, where they are informed about the release of new voting. And here also the scatter in search of 4 days.....
https://t.co/y6Tctjbilx User is willing to undergo even KYS to prove his humanity. She actively voted for STG management proposals to be an active member of this community, also got the roles of staker and pool 1k. You can see she has assets on her wallet in the minutes. For example she restacks ezETH in Mendi for over $1000, holds liquidity in Stargate for over $1000 and has other assets in different networks.
https://t.co/SmejYs7BRn
There are a lot of complaints about this report in the discrrd. I've only looked at the ones that were unfair. Here's another example https://t.co/91g7aw5J7p
As you can see, there are false positives. And the methodology is very questionable! So you can't use this cluster, especially other projects can use these lists later. And the real user will get a tag on his real wallet.
.@PrimordialAA this one also looks weird
Report: 20038-211-groups-7407-addresses
We are trying to develop decentralization as much as possible, but at the same time we give sybil marks to DAO participants. I myself thought that DAO voting in Stargate could be a multiplier for $ZRO airdrop. I voted more than 10 times.
By the way, I personally know Vadim from @coinmetrika. I'm confident he pursues only the right goals.
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs Lots of disagreement with this report. If my arguments do not convince you, then explore outside opinions
https://t.co/PC781YQ3y7
https://t.co/ectoEnO6ET
All the reports I tagged you about have been removed from Sybil's list. Only this one remains. You can see I wrote to you for a reason.
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs Lots of disagreement with this report. If my arguments do not convince you, then explore outside opinions
https://t.co/PC781YQ3y7
https://t.co/ectoEnO6ET
All the reports I tagged you about have been removed from Sybil's list. Only this one remains. You can see I wrote to you for a reason.
Another report with false positives https://t.co/p8xt46yA2V
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@LayerZero_Fndn
His methodology is based on Stargate DAO votes, each of which as we know had a deadline of 3 days. The accounts that performed the transactions that signed the votes were clustered with other wallets that randomly elsewhere on the planet performed exactly the same transactions with a timing of 4 days. LayerZero has 6 million wallets at the time of the snapshot. Don't you admit that voting can be plus minus at the same time, because users are members of different communities, where they are informed about the release of new voting. And here also the scatter in search of 4 days.....
https://t.co/y6Tctjbilx User is willing to undergo even KYS to prove his humanity. She actively voted for STG management proposals to be an active member of this community, also got the roles of staker and pool 1k. You can see she has assets on her wallet in the minutes. For example she restacks ezETH in Mendi for over $1000, holds liquidity in Stargate for over $1000 and has other assets in different networks.
https://t.co/SmejYs7BRn
There are a lot of complaints about this report in the discrrd. I've only looked at the ones that were unfair. Here's another example https://t.co/91g7aw5J7p
As you can see, there are false positives. And the methodology is very questionable! So you can't use this cluster, especially other projects can use these lists later. And the real user will get a tag on his real wallet.
@coinmetrika@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@LayerZero_Fndn@PrimordialAA
https://t.co/V5AqCoTLBl
not a fair report, these protocols use Layerzero technologies! or check the wallets from this cluster! there are both cheap transactions and with a volume of $ 25k and 13 months of activity!
false alarm! see the balance
@PrimordialAA report
https://t.co/bGZppqhpjI
report
https://t.co/V5AqCoTdLN
$200-700 balance, activity for 12 months, more than 100 transactions, 15 networks, 30 smart contracts,volume of more than $ 20k
appeal within 3 hours!
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs Another example of a report with false positives https://t.co/Rd1uL5szXF
It is strange that you accepted it at all, because this report does not meet the condition of 20 wallets to be combined into a cluster. The methodology of this report specifies the minimum cluster size of 10 wallets.
Setting EPS to 1 second is also inappropriate in this case. There are 6 million wallets in the protocol, and within one second there can be several transactions unrelated to each other.
1) For example, this cluster has a wallet https://t.co/aCz0ODDvdv. It doesn't look like a sybil. The user stores $10,000 worth of liquidity in different protocols and blockchains. He has restake ETH and USDC in Zircuit, Karak, Reya and other protocols for thousands of dollars. The wallet is more than 3 years old. What kind of sybil is he? It is the wallet of a regular user who got into this cluster.
Appeal Against the Sybil Report Methodology
https://t.co/bnsxn5CjfH
Summary of the Sybil Report
- Total Wallets Identified: 32000
- Total Clusters Identified: 803
Dear
@PrimordialAA@LayerZero_Labs@LayerZero_Fndn
@PrimordialAA and @LayerZero_Labs
check the report
https://t.co/V5AqCoTdLN
check the report
https://t.co/bGZppqhpjI
$200-700 wallet balance, activity for 12 months, more than 100 transactions, 15 networks, 30 smart contracts,volume of more than $20k, snapshot voting