@TRohde94 Dertil går der 78 minutter før der bliver skiftet ud. Spillerne har ikke gjort andet end, at halse efter bolden. Vi mangler i den grad identitet.
🎯 NATHAN ASPINALL GIVEAWAY! 🎯
A set of Nathan Aspinall G2 darts in 24g signed by the man himself and a set of his new K-Flex!
To be in with a chance of winning them, all you have to do is:
Like
Retweet
Follow @joshpearson180
Ends Monday 19th January, good luck! 🤞🏼
@MernsDK Umildbart skreg jeg os skyd. Men synes egentlig, at når man ser den fra en anden vinkel, at afleveringen er det rigtige valg. Ærgerligt, at afleveringen er så ringe
@jkw_thfc@Lukathfc Maybe. But there’s no point in posting a video of something that happened previously. I get the frustration. But I feel like this post is implying it’s not a red which it very much is👍
@ClarkJamesYNWA Men vil vi have VAR fuldstændig ignorer så åbenlyst et trøje pull? Jeg skriver det her med forbehold. Men hvem ved om wirtz når frem til bolden, vender på en tallerken og sparker den ind?
@MernsDK “Making an obvious action directly infront of the goalkeeper” er deres begrundelse for den her offside kendelse. Robertson gør ingenting forkert.
Og til information har afstand intet med noget, at gøre. Grunden til city ikke skal stå er, at deres bliver sparket efter bolden.
#MCILIV – 38’
The referee’s call of offside and no goal to Liverpool was checked and confirmed by VAR – with Robertson in an offside position and deemed to be making an obvious action directly in front of the goalkeeper.