@0xKmafia tbh it's the only way to save this chart , this might sound stupid but it's a fact
Retro for loyal users then a points season , i don't see any other option otherwise this chart will keep going till 37-43$ and accumulate for so long just to be stomped again at 60$
@Not_A_Human333@ThinkingUSD It’s more about the unpredictable manipulative events that occur suddenly when everything is fine ,i think almost everyone agrees on this , in Biden’a era trading was fair and crypto felt real , now it’s just a mess
TA still working on BTC big time frame but short time ? Hell no
@PeterSchiff Idk why u people are hating on him ..
Technically he’s right , nothing about btc is bullish atm , the chart speaks for itself , BTC dumped 20k$ in 10 days without a FUD or any global event , so what makes you think it won’t dump further if smth bad happens ?
His TA is valid
Fuck you @Binance
“In search of knowledge” is a strange thing to post after 10/10, because the one thing Binance did not give the market was knowledge;
No full post mortem.
No raw trade data.
No complete order book reconstruction.
No tick level timeline.
No liquidation engine report.
No explanation of mark price behaviour.
No clear index methodology during the event.
No venue by venue comparison.
No matching engine logs.
No latency data.
No API degradation report.
No market maker activity breakdown.
No liquidation queue data.
No ADL transparency.
No insurance fund movement report.
No account class exposure.
No explanation why so many Binance USDT spot pairs printed insane lows compared to other major exchanges.
Binance has 430 USDT spot pairs. 410 of them also had prices available on OKX, Bybit, Bitget or Gate during the same period.
On 10/10, 103 Binance pairs hit lows more than 10% below the second lowest exchange.
Many were not small deviations. They were absurd structural breaks.
Retail got liquidated on prices the public still cannot properly audit, while the largest offshore exchange and primary altcoin USDT price discovery venue gave everyone slogans instead of forensic transparency.
If Binance is really in search of knowledge, start by releasing the data you refused to give after 10/10.
One of my best years so far!😉
To celebrate, I’m giving away one of my Hypurr NFT . Worth 900 $HYPE (~$61K) 💥
How to enter:
1️⃣ Like & RT this post
2️⃣ Comment “Done”
3️⃣ Follow @yenperps 🔔
⏰ Giveaway ends in 24 hours, don’t miss it!
@0xKmafia there will be S3 , no doubt , somewhere mid june-july, it will run till November
the point page section in the mobile APP indicates that, why would they add it ?
my take , 4% of unclaimed tokens will go to loyal users as retroactive reward, and a new season with 7-9% will launch
Yes.
The CLARITY Act is NOT bullish for crypto.
And that`s nothing new.
It is bullish for turning crypto into another floor inside the same financial casino that Bitcoin was originally created to escape from.
Cypherpunks did not spend decades talking about privacy, censorship resistance, self custody and sovereign systems so Larry Fink could eventually tokenize BlackRock products on approved chains while politicians and exchanges decide which networks deserve legitimacy.
People completely misunderstand what is happening.
Look again at which accounts are pretending this is some kind of revolution or historic win.
And: This only affects the United States.
People talk as if the entire world just entered a new era while the global future itself looks increasingly unstable, fragmented and economically fragile.
One country creating regulatory clarity does not magically solve the deeper structural problems ahead.
The "bullish"-boys?
Mostly the same people who blindly stumble through every narrative thrown at them without understanding what they are even defending.
The moment the state stops treating an alternative financial system as a threat and starts building legal rails around it, you should at least ask yourself whether the system is still adversarial at all.
-Wall Street did not suddenly develop ideals.
-Washington did not suddenly discover decentralization.
-Banks did not suddenly start caring about financial freedom.
They understood something CT refuses to understand:
Crypto became too large to kill, so now it will be integrated, shaped, absorbed and controlled through regulation, dependency and infrastructure capture.
Exactly how every system throughout history survives disruption.
Empires did not survive by rejecting threats.
They survived by domesticating them
The internet was once decentralized and open.
Then a handful of platforms became the internet itself.
Open source software now runs trillion dollar corporations while the original builders barely benefit from it.
And now crypto, a movement born from distrust toward centralized financial power, is slowly being reconstructed into a compliant asset layer for the same institutions it was supposed to route around.
People scream “bullish” because ETFs arrive, because pension funds enter, because regulators create frameworks and because politicians finally smile at the industry.
But ask yourself one thing:
If the same political and financial class that helped create endless debt expansion, surveillance capitalism, bank bailouts, lobbying capture and systemic corruption suddenly embraces your “revolution”, are you still looking at a revolution?
Or are you looking at assimilation?
The CLARITY Act gives large entities what they always needed:
legal certainty, operational protection and regulatory barriers smaller actors cannot easily survive.
-Compliance is expensive.
-Licensing is expensive.
-Legal interpretation is expensive.
Large corporations love complexity because complexity centralizes power around those who can afford it.
This is why small independent builders disappear over time while giant exchanges, custodians and politically connected firms consolidate influence.
And CT celebrates it because the candles turn green for 2 weeks.
Most people in crypto no longer care about decentralization in any serious sense. They care about access to upside inside systems they still fundamentally do not control.
Facts:
-Self custody rates remain terrible.
-Most users stay on centralized exchanges.
-Most liquidity sits behind custodians.
-Most narratives are controlled by influencers, venture funds and market makers.
-Most “communities” are manufactured engagement funnels.
-People talk like cypherpunks while behaving like consumers.
That is the real problem.
The uncomfortable truth is that truly decentralized systems are inefficient, difficult and often hostile to convenience.
That is the price of resilience. The same way democracy is slower than dictatorship and open systems are messier than centralized ones.
But humans repeatedly trade resilience for convenience until the system eventually becomes fragile enough to abuse.
Instead much of the industry now begs for institutional approval, political integration and regulatory blessing from the exact structures Bitcoin originally responded to after 2008.
The market may pump from this.
Institutional flows may increase from this.
But do not confuse price appreciation with ideological victory.
Those are completely different things.
What I do look forward to, however, is more accountability and consumer protection.
But even that will become a farce if the same idiots remain in control of the narrative and the rules.
Once this nightmare is over and they are all behind bars, I see a big future for Natalie Harp as a shitposter and memecoin shiller.
For now, she is doing it in the name of the United States.
@RealCryptoFace Whether i win or not , it doesn’t matter
The real prize is the knowledge i acquired watching your streams in the most depressive moments of my life , they made me laugh and taught me a lot , grateful to you CF
@MastrXYZ as long as there's Trump , crypto doesn't exist , now it's just a tool for his family to make side money , meanwhile other scam projects founders who didn't dare to rug before , are now rugging because there's zero regulation, it's just a mess
there's no point of building yet
They are literally doing the same thing with $WLFI.
In the official Risk Disclosures, @worldlibertyfi states that it can block wallet addresses and temporarily or permanently freeze tokens if, in its own discretion, it believes an address is connected to violations of the token terms.
It also states that WLFI can block transfers to and from certain addresses on chain.
And then you have the separate issue of tokens not being unlocked.
Decentralisation my ass
I am maybe not always 100% right.
I am maybe not always nice.
I am maybe not always easy to deal with. Probably rarely.
I do not always make the perfect call.
But I am genuinely trying to do better every time, and I mean that from the heart.
I am trying to keep the balance between being a project lead and being a normal X account as honestly and sincerely as I can, with the tools, time and possibilities I have.
Sometimes it works. And sometimey it does not.
Sometimes the results speak for themselves.
Sometimes they are not good enough.
And most of the time, I personally get nothing out of it.
That is how it is.
But I am grateful that I get to walk this strange path through Web2 and Web3 with all of you.
I honestly never thought that someone like me, with my way of speaking, thinking and writing, could reach almost 30k followers in 2 years.
That is probably my biggest personal positive point in all of this.
Thank you all. You are the real deal. The big win.
You wonder why this space is completely lost?
Nr 1 example.. this dude compares $WLFi to Bitcoin...
Post anything critical about $WLFI and the comments immediately turn into an IQ test with no passing score.
My posts get flooded by people defending a Trump linked insider circus like it is some misunderstood revolution for financial freedom.
A new $BTC and we are all fudders...