Whenever I mention Musk in a post, the first accounts who like the post are always sexbots.
They always claim to be from the city where I live, Cardiff.
Is this a way to mark accounts so they can be limited? Is it meant to intimidate? Or is this just meant to distract people?
Meet Madeline Mann.
She is the Administrative Director of Clinical and Translational Science Training at @UCSF.
In the video below, she threatens to hunt down and kill @bourne_beth2345 all because she doesn't believe in child mutilation.
Are students and faculty at @UCSF supposed to feel safe with a faculty member who threatens to hunt down and murder people just because they don't share her views?
@KarrieboKarrie@CA_Dem Me too. I did make a police report with the @SFPD — but the police officer who witnessed the incident and took the report, “Kathryn” Winters, is a trans-identified man pretending to be a woman.
🚨🚨I had to make a police report after this woman threatened to k*ll me.
Watch the cognitive dissonance on her face.
This was last Saturday at the @CA_Dem Democratic Party convention in San Francisco when this woman stands next to me with her sign, “Patients Before Politics,” urging democrats to stop the banning of pediatric gender interventions.
One of the aspects of the Giggle v Tickle decision that is on a loop in my mind is that, in their minds, they haven’t made woman-only spaces unlawful.
It’s much more sinister than that.
They’ve made not accepting men who claim to be women to be unlawful.
So you can have your “woman only space”, so long as you accept that some men can be women & welcome them in, whether you like it or not.
(And thereby, obviously, making woman-only spaces obsolete in reality)
And this is why I say that women’s rights are just the canary in the coal mine of this issue. Because anyone can be told to disbelieve what they see with their own eyes under fear of punishment, and there are going to be people who were against Giggle who eventually wonder why no one tried to stop it.
**Medical Tuesday. Call to Action.**
Press 7 for English...
This exact incident is repeatedly cited in the comments -
You are in the exam room. You cannot understand the physician. The physician cannot understand you. English is required for safe care in this country. If that standard is not met, you are not being difficult. You are documenting a safety failure.
Do not smile and leave. Communication is part of the license.
**In the room, immediately**
Stop the visit if you cannot confirm the plan. Say it out loud: “I cannot understand you and I need another physician or a qualified medical interpreter.” Ask the nurse or charge nurse to stay. Do not accept a family member as the official interpreter for diagnosis, consent, or medication changes. Write down the doctor’s name, the time, the clinic, and exactly what you could not understand.
**Before you leave**
Request a different provider. You do not owe a long explanation. “I am not comfortable continuing with this physician because we cannot communicate” is enough. Ask for the after-visit summary in writing. If a prescription or procedure was discussed, do not agree to it until you can repeat the plan back in clear English and have it confirmed.
**After you leave**
Write a dated note: what was said, what was missed, who was present, and whether an interpreter was offered. Keep copies of the summary, prescriptions, and any messages in the patient portal.
**Where to report**
Primary channel: your State Medical Board. They license the physician and can investigate language competence and unsafe practice. Directory: https://t.co/i6gRurNZOD
Also send the same factual complaint to the hospital or clinic risk management and patient safety office. They are required to look at it.
State Department of Health if the facility is involved.
CMS at 1-800-MEDICARE if Medicare or Medicaid paid for the visit.
If the physician is on a visa or the clinic staffs through visa programs, notify USCIS and ICE tip lines as well. Visa status to practice in the United States includes the ability to function in the workplace. A doctor who cannot communicate with the patient is not functioning.
HHS Office of Inspector General if federal program money is involved.
You do not need a lawyer. You need dates, names, and a clear statement: care could not be given because communication failed.
Too many families walk out and switch doctors in silence. Silence protects the two-tier pipeline. It does not protect the next patient.
If you cannot communicate with a caregiver, they cannot be giving care. By definition.
Document. Request another physician. Report it.
Comment below if you have had to do this. Bookmark and share so the next person in that room knows the steps.
Wilson and many of her supporters are telling Republicans not to rank anyone else. That instruction is the problem, not her conservatism, her business background, or Mike Shower as lieutenant governor. A governor has to get high-stakes mechanics right. Ranked-choice voting in Alaska is one of those mechanics this year.
Telling voters to leave other Republicans unranked can exhaust ballots that would otherwise stay with Republicans and can hand the race to Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins even when Republicans start with a large combined share. That is exactly what happened in the 2022 special House election.
Here are two versions of the same conservative ballot (Bronson first among the Republicans) under the elimination order you described: Taylor out first, then Bronson, leaving Wilson vs. JKT.
Ballot 1 — Rank all three Republicans
Order: Bronson 1st, Wilson 2nd, Taylor 3rd. Leave JKT blank.
Round 1: Taylor is eliminated. Your first choice is still Bronson, so the ballot stays active.
Taylor’s ballots transfer to whoever those voters ranked next (a mix of Bronson and Wilson). After those transfers, Wilson is ahead of Bronson, as in your scenario.
Bronson is then eliminated. Your next remaining ranking is Wilson, so the ballot transfers to her.
Your vote is still live in the final Wilson–JKT round.
If enough Republicans do this, Wilson receives the transferred conservative votes instead of watching them disappear.
Ballot 2 — Skip Wilson because the “do not rank” advice is bad
Order: Bronson 1st, Taylor 2nd. Wilson left unranked. Leave JKT blank.
Round 1: Taylor is eliminated. Your first choice is still Bronson, so the ballot stays active.
Taylor’s ballots again transfer to Bronson and Wilson. Wilson is now ahead of Bronson.
Bronson is eliminated. Your only remaining ranking is Taylor, who is already gone. There is no ranking for Wilson, so the ballot becomes exhausted. It does not transfer to her and is removed from the continuing total.
That single exhausted ballot is small. Thousands of them are not. Exhausted ballots shrink the pool of votes still being counted. The winner only needs a majority of continuing ballots, not a majority of all ballots originally cast. When Republican votes drop out instead of transferring, the denominator falls and a Democrat can cross 50% of what is left even if Republicans together had close to 60% of first-choice support.
Why this is the 2022 special all over again
In the 2022 special U.S. House election the first-choice totals were roughly Peltola 40%, Palin 31%, Begich 28%. Combined Republican first choices were about 59%. Begich was eliminated. About half of his voters ranked Palin next, about 29% ranked Peltola, and about 21% ranked neither and exhausted. Those exhausted Begich ballots (more than 11,000) were larger than Peltola’s final margin. Palin received most of the transfers but not enough of them; Peltola won 51.5% of the remaining ballots.
The same arithmetic applies here. If Wilson’s voters (and people who would have ranked her second or third) follow the “do not rank anyone else” instruction, their ballots die when their first choice is eliminated. Wilson never receives those transfers. The continuing total shrinks. JKT can win the last round without ever having a majority of all votes cast.
Ranking the other Republicans does not require liking them more than Wilson. It only requires preferring them to the Democrat. You can still put Wilson first if that is your genuine preference. You can put Bronson or Taylor first and Wilson second. What does not make sense is telling conservatives to leave the other Republicans blank when the system is designed so that those blank lines turn into exhausted ballots.
That is a narrow, practical disagreement about how this election system actually works. It is not an attack on every Republican on the ballot. It is pointing out that the advice being given will, under the exact elimination order you laid out, cost Wilson the very transfer votes she would need once Taylor and then Bronson are gone.
They do this to little girls every single day because men won’t marry an uncut girl. In Somalia, they do it in private homes with no anesthetic. In the US and the UK, it’s done in doctor’s offices with modern pain meds, but that doesn’t make it any less barbarous.
This is what feminism was born to fight, but modern liberal feminists turn a blind eye because it goes against their narrative about how white men are the epitome of evil and Islam is a religion of peace. They ignore unimaginable female suffering because the people causing it aren’t the ones their ideology tells them to oppose.
The man that pleaded guilty to following me into my home, Harvy Barsoom, is listed as white in the new documents I just received.
Barsoom is from Egypt.
Hispanics and those from Middle Eastern countries are often labeled as white in police databases.
Why haven't we changed this?
We need accurate crime data.
A superfood is not discovered. It is commissioned, and one family in California did the whole thing in public.
Stewart and Lynda Resnick bought a pistachio orchard with some pomegranate trees on it and kept them because the return per acre was better. Then Lynda Resnick did the thing she is genuinely brilliant at. She went and bought the science.
By 2012 they had put more than $35 million into pomegranate research and had 70 studies published in peer-reviewed journals. In 2007 the company spent more on research than on advertising, $17 million against $12 million, and she said publicly that she was proud of it. One peer reviewer rejected a manuscript for being excessively advocatory of pomegranate juice as a treatment for prostate cancer. It was published elsewhere.
Then the advertising, quoting the research they had paid for. The juice could treat, prevent or reduce the risk of heart disease. Prostate cancer. Erectile dysfunction. Clinically proven. One billboard put the little bottle under a hangman's noose and the words Cheat Death.
The Federal Trade Commission found deceptive claims across 36 advertisements and promotional materials. The order named both Resnicks personally and runs for twenty years. In 2015 the DC Circuit affirmed it. In 2016 the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal.
After the ruling, they gave UCLA $4 million to start a Food Law and Policy Program.
And none of that is the expensive part.
The Wonderful Company holds around 185,000 acres of California, fifteen million trees drinking on the order of 120 billion gallons a year, more than any other private interest in the American West. To feed it they hold a 57% controlling stake in the Kern Water Bank, 32 square miles storing up to 1.5 million acre-feet underground, built with over $70 million of state money for public drought relief and handed into private control in 1994.
So when the droughts came the family holding the bank were insulated from the thing everyone else was suffering, and could sell water back into the system that had paid to dig it. In a bad year they outbid every other farmer in the valley. Neighbours grub out orchards. The nut acreage stays in the ground.
That is what the little bottle costs.
The verdict changed nothing. It sits in the chiller today at the same price, beside the word antioxidant, sold to people who have never heard of the Kern Water Bank and could not find Kern County on a map of the state whose drought they read about every summer.
A superfood is a crop somebody owns a lot of, with a laboratory on retainer and a media buy behind it.
Nobody has ever had to buy 70 studies to make people eat beef.
How to fight Communism 2.0
The first step is to stop celebrating a victory that was not won. The ideology did not die in 1989. It mutated, migrated, and entrenched itself in the institutions of the civilization it had set out to destroy. Acknowledging this is not paranoia. It is the beginning of an accurate map.
The second step is to take seriously the testimony of those who recognize the pattern – particularly those from Central and Eastern Europe, who paid in decades of subjugation for the knowledge they now carry, and who have been trying, with increasing urgency, to share it with a West that has been strangely reluctant to listen.
The third step is to rebuild: the epistemic institutions that can distinguish truth from narrative, the cultural transmission that connects generations to their inheritance, the moral formation that produces people capable of genuine courage and genuine self-governance, and the civilizational confidence that what has been built here is worth defending, transmitting, and extending.
The fourth step is to understand where the battle is actually being fought. Not primarily in parliaments or elections, though both matter. The decisive terrain is institutional – the schools forming the next generation’s assumptions, the media setting the boundaries of permissible thought, the corporations enforcing ideological conformity under the language of inclusion, and above all the artificial intelligence systems now being trained, at civilizational scale, on values that one side of this struggle did not choose and was not consulted about. Whoever writes the values into the machines will have more influence over the next century than any election result.
The fifth step is to reverse the negative moral selection – to seek out, protect, and promote the people pushed aside for honesty, and build institutions where integrity is an advantage rather than a liability. This is not sentimentality. It is survival. Institutions filled with people selected for their willingness to perform the lie cannot navigate reality. They can only manage narratives – until the gap between narrative and reality becomes unmanageable, and the collapse is far more destructive than honest reckoning would ever have been.
The sixth step is to recover the language. Zakłamanie – the systemic lie. Obłuda – the deep hypocrisy – the deliberate performance of virtue while knowingly living a lie. Every Western language needs functional equivalents – not as exotic imports but as urgent descriptions of a pathology now operating on Western soil. A civilization whose words for harm, violence, and justice have been quietly redefined to serve the ideology must reclaim its language or invent new words. Without accurate language there is no accurate thought. Without accurate thought there is no effective action.
The seventh step is to build. Have children. Start companies. Create beauty. Found institutions. Invest in futures that extend beyond the next quarter or the next election. This sounds almost quaint alongside the grand vocabulary of civilizational struggle. It is not quaint. In a culture that has systematically undermined the confidence and purpose required for long-term investment in life, choosing to build is itself an act of resistance. The ideology wins its deepest victories not through argument but through demoralization – through producing people too exhausted and too rootless to build anything that lasts. Refusing that demoralization is the most fundamental defiance available.
The eighth step – and the most important – is to tell the truth. In public, at personal cost, without the escape hatch of ironic detachment. Not as performance or tribe signal, but plainly, in the specific situation in front of you, when honesty is genuinely difficult and the comfortable formulation would be easier.
This is where civilizations are actually won and lost…
1/2
Bexley Has Been Made Borough Of Sanctuary For Refugees.
Letter Sent To Residents Asking Them To Keep Their Young Daughters Inside & Not allow Them To Wear Short Skirts Which Will Tempt The Refugee To Rape Them.
Also Asks Residents To Keep Dogs Inside.
Lady Reads Out The Letter
Alaska We Got The Poo On Us.
VOTE YES ON 2 TO END THE POO.
Ranked Choice Voting is a pure Alaskan dumpster fire. 🗑️🔥
Here’s how this nonsense actually plays out: 🤦♂️
Imagine you’re at a potluck in the bush and it’s time for the good stuff. 🌲🍲
The options are:
Candied Salmon 🐟🍯
King Crab 🦀👑
Moose Poo 💩🦌
Blueberry Pie 🥧🫐
Everyone votes. 🗳️
49 people go hard for Candied Salmon (Hell yeah!) 🙌🐟
24 lock in on King Crab (Solid!) 🦀👍
17 somehow pick Moose Poo… (What the actual hell?) 🤢💩
10 people actually want Blueberry Pie (Really?) 🥧🤷
Blueberry Pie gets the fewest votes, so it’s gone. ❌🥧
But those 10 pie fans all ranked Moose Poo as their second choice. 🥈💩
New tally: 📊
Candied Salmon: 49 🐟
Moose Poo: 27 💩
King Crab: 24 🦀
King Crab is eliminated next. ❌🦀
And every single King Crab voter? They ranked Moose Poo as their next pick. 🤯
Final score: 🏆
Moose Poo: 51 💩
Candied Salmon: 49 🐟
Wait… WHAT IN THE ACTUAL TUNDRA?! 🥶🛑
The thing almost nobody wanted just beat the clear favorite. 📉
The people who were craving Candied Salmon (and would rather starve than touch Moose Poo) never even got their second choice counted. 🚫🍽️
The least popular option wins simply because it hung around long enough while everyone else’s votes got secretly redistributed in the back room. 🕵️♂️🔄
That’s Ranked Choice Voting. 🤡🗳️
Your first-choice vote can be thrown in the burn barrel. 🛢️🔥
Someone’s third or fourth pick can decide the winner. 🎲🎯
It’s not “majority rule.” ❌⚖️
It’s last-man-standing by mathematical sleight of hand 🪄🎩 — like winning the Iditarod by being the only musher who didn’t freeze to death. 🐕❄️🥇
And who shoved this mess on Alaska? 🤷♂️🏔️
Outside dark-money networks 💸🌑 — including the Arabella Advisors machine and its billionaire-funded web of NGOs 🕸️💰 — poured millions into forcing Ranked Choice Voting down our throats in 2020. 🤮💵
They spent a fortune to make our elections more complicated, more confusing, and easier for the Moose Poo candidate to sneak through. 🥷💩
Alaskans never asked for this. 🙅♂️🛑
We don’t need it. 🚫
We don’t want it. 😠
This November we finally get to take out the trash. 🗓️🗑️
Vote YES on Ballot Measure 2 ✅🗳️
to REMOVE and REPEAL Ranked Choice Voting from Alaska once and for all. ✂️🛑
Let’s get back to simple, honest elections where the candidate with the most votes actually wins. 🇺🇸🥇
YES to ENDING DARK MONEY 🛑💸
YES to ENDING ARABELLA ADVISORS 🛑🕸️
YES to ENDING RANKED CHOICE VOTING 🛑🗳️
YES to ENDING SOROS IN ALASKA 🛑💰
YES on 2. ✅✌️
Let's take a walk through the "American justice system," shall we?
Sharmake Omar is the Somali man who filmed Shiloh Hendrix on the playground in Minnesota that day in April 2025.
In January 2022, he and another Somali man "allegedly" spent two days raping an underage foster care runaway in a trailer, keeping her falsely imprisoned.
In March 2025, all charges were dismissed "in the interest of justice."
Weeks later, in April 2025, he turned his camera phone on at the playground after a young Somali thief attempted to steal from a White mom, Shiloh Hendrix, and began haranguing that White mom for having said the word "nigger." Omar demanded that Hendrix repeat the word on camera, which she did - four times, while Omar himself said the word five times in the less-than-one-minute video.
Four long months later, multiple "disorderly conduct" charges were maliciously brought against Shiloh Hendrix for the playground incident in which she was the only victim, and Sharmake Omar was the videographer.
Then, last night, Shiloh Hendrix was CONVICTED - specifically for saying "nigger" to Sharmake Omar AFTER he demanded she say it, while he himself said it repeatedly. Her sentence is a $1,000 fine and 200 hours of community service.
By the way, Sharmake Omar WAS NEVER CALLED TO TESTIFY in the Hendrix trial.
But don't worry, that's not all the justice we have in store for today. Just keep the substance of Shiloh's "crime" - as well as her sentence - in mind as we move forward.
Rewind to April 2020. That's when Sharmake Omar, our favorite Somali videographer, along with another Somali friend of his (separate from his alleged co-raper), committed a violent assault in the street. Omar threw a rock at a car, then attacked and beat the 16-year-old driver. A bystander tried to intervene, but Omar's accomplice threatened him with a knife.
For this, Sharmake Omar was charged merely with DISORDERLY CONDUCT. Yes, for hurling a deadly weapon at a vehicle, then beating the teenage driver while his criminal pal held off onlookers at knifepoint, Omar faced the EXACT SAME CHARGE that Shiloh Hendrix faced for saying a word that Omar asked her to say, as she held her child in her arms and fled the playground before Omar could assault her, too.
Like Shiloh Hendrix, Sharmake Omar was convicted on his count of disorderly conduct.
His sentence?
A $200 fine.
That's it. That's the entire thing.
So, to review:
Rape an underage foster child for two days (allegedly)? Clean slate.
Hurl a deadly weapon at a car and assault its driver? $200.
Say a word to an accused rapist/kidnapper and convicted violent criminal who demands you say it while saying it himself? $1,000 and 200 hours - not to mention international infamy.
Could the anti-White standard be any more egregiously in our faces?
Seriously, everyone involved in prosecuting the Shiloh Hendrix case is unspeakably evil. This includes, but is not limited to:
~ Rochester City Attorney Michael Spindler-Krage
~ Lead prosecutor Nicholas Shabel
~ Judge Christa Daily, who ensured Shiloh's conviction
~ The Rochester NAACP
~ Rochester's "Community Engagement Response Team"
~ Rochester Mayor Kim Norton
~ Rochester City Council President Randy Schubring
~ Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison
~ Minnesota's Council on American-Islamic Relations
~ Sharmake Omar, without whom none of this would have happened
~ The young Somali thief's non-English speaking parents
~ Innumerable members of the local Somali scam network
~ Six jurors - two men and four women (reportedly all White) - who unanimously agreed that White people are not protected under the US Constitution
While we're here, a special dishonorable mention must go to every single "FIRST AMENDMENT" organization in this hollowed-out country of ours. You know the ones - they relentlessly solicit and collect large sums of money to "DEFEND FREE SPEECH" while continuously, cravenly shrinking away from EVERY meaningful case where White people - LITERALLY THE ONLY GROUP WITH MAJORITY SUPPORT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT - are so clearly maliciously persecuted.
Similarly, NOT ONE official at any level of government has spoken up to defend Shiloh Hendrix or her Constitutional rights, nor to condemn the flagrantly anti-White, utterly unconstitutional witch hunt she's endured. Not one.
And on that note, we conclude today's review of the good ol' "American justice system."
Lady Justice isn't blind. She's anti-White. And it's never been plainer to see.
Michael Bon's humanitarian parole was terminated in June 2025, yet the Massachusetts RMV says Bon applied to renew his CDL in February 2026 and was again approved.
HOW AND WHY?!
Stephen Polishan, President of the Pennsylvania State Troopers Association, released the following statement:
"This is not about politics. This is about right versus wrong. Trooper Pahira was a hero, and his family, fellow troopers and the public deserve answers. They need to know why the person accused of this senseless killing, who was in the United States illegally, had been granted a commercial driver's license in Massachusetts. This individual should never have been driving such a dangerous vehicle on our highways. But he was, and now a good man is dead. Trooper Pahira should be alive today."
This is Mandy. Mandy has severe physical disabilities. She was RAPED in her own home by a convict who was released early from prison. He was sent by her landlord to do some plumbing work. He subjected her to 4 hours of horrific abuse and also stole all her savings. She came down on the train from Manchester to be with us yesterday and tell us her story. @andyburnham and Manchester city council have failed this lady on so many levels it is heartbreaking 💔I will be working with @MarlonTag to help Mandy get her life back and the help her get what she needs to live a secure and independent life. More to come. Thank you Mandy for your bravery and support my darling 🩷 @_HenryBolton@RestoreBritain@lewisrholmes @pinkladies_uk