@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito They said a drawing of Nintendo characters for 4.5k an existing drawing, never stated 4.5k for fanart of Nintendo characters
@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito Alright broski,
Im gonna hit the gym with a sam sulek vid.
You can continue to cry about an artist on twitter or w/e this is
@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito I just went through your post tweets, now I get it.
Youre just against fanart in general because you can "visualize" without a final product. Lmao whatever keeps your spirits up โ๏ธ๐ญ
@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito Actually pointless to keep replying keep crying in the slumps and staying pissy at others โ๏ธ. Let me guess, age 30~40, didnt make much with your education and now ecstatic that ai can code for you? Sounds right?
@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito Sure now lets stop the devouring and get back to the original point.
The purpose of the discussion was what she advertised, she didnt advertise to "sell" fanart. She advertised her skill in art, her previous commissions have been non fanart, you can not justify a "what if"
@inyourshitpal@ohlookimadorito Dawg, you'd fail horrendously in court "trust me bro" "I can bring up a point without proof, and its fact" I never said someone did or didnt commission her for that price, you made the point, back it up
@inyourshitpal@grok@ohlookimadorito Youre dodging the meaning of words, once again I guess.
"IF used for entertainment/sale" the piece specifically was not used for sale, her service was