Hemos ganado un Mundial con Pedri suplente. Yamal al 50%. Con Pedro Porro, lateral de un equipo que casi desciende a Segunda. Con Rodri MVP tras recuperarse de una rotura de ligamento cruzado. Con Mikel Merino como héroe tras 4 meses parado. Con Baena siendo clave tras un año malo. Con Unai Simón ganando el Guante de Oro pese a que toda España pedía su suplencia. Laporte siendo el central del torneo tras un año duro, y Cubarsí sentando cátedra con 19 años. Con un Ferran Torres al que acribillaron y nos ha dado la segunda estrella.
Y encima jugando un fútbol excelso. Esta hazaña es historia del deporte.
🗽 ¿Y por qué no?
26 camisetas. 26 personas. Una ciudad, Nueva York.
26 jugadores convocados con 50 millones de españoles viviendo la misma pasión.
#VamosEspaña | #CopaMundialFIFA
@Funmentalist Me too. Assuming Marc's numbers are right (1) Could be $3.4B 2026 revenue too conservative rn? leading to lower rev for the next 7 months and closer to your ARR? or (2) Maybe is Token Factory ramping so fast that same capacity much more rev?
@ajnogues No discuto eso. Mi comentario va más por la parte de que no harán falta "tantos chips". Cuánto más barata sea la IA, más se usará (tanto en nº de tokens como de usuarios, Jevons paradox). Y eso solo en cuanto a LLMs. Añade generación de vídeo, robótica, conducción autónoma...
Today is a dark day for freedom and democracy in Europe. General chat surveillance has been implemented in Brussels. A disgrace.
The so-called Chat Control 1.0 cleared a crucial hurdle in the European Parliament today. This means platforms may once again be allowed to scan private messages, officially on a “voluntary” basis, but in practice this marks the return of indiscriminate monitoring of private communication.
What makes this especially bitter is that a majority of the MEPs who voted were reportedly against it. According to Patrick Breyer, 314 MEPs voted against the regulation, 276 voted in favor and 17 abstained. And yet the rejection failed because it was not enough to have a simple majority of those voting. An absolute majority of all MEPs would have been required.
That is the democratic scandal.
When a majority of those present votes against a proposal and it still passes because a formal threshold is not reached, it does not feel like democratic decision-making to many citizens. It feels like a procedural trick.
And it becomes even more problematic when you look at the context: Chat Control had already been rejected before. Yet the issue was put back on the agenda shortly before the summer break, through an urgent procedure, at a time when absences could become decisive.
This is not just some technical regulation. It goes to the very core of private communication. It is about whether digital messages remain fundamentally private or whether platforms may systematically scan content again, without concrete suspicion, without a court order and without any individual cause.
A free society must not turn private communication into a potential surveillance zone. Anyone who takes digital fundamental rights seriously cannot accept millions of innocent people being placed under general suspicion.
Today, a dangerous signal was sent: fundamental rights can be hollowed out through procedural logic, timing and political tricks. Not through an open, clear and honest majority, but through a system in which absence effectively helps the supporters.
This is a dark day for Europe.
Not because the fight is over, but because today showed how easily digital fundamental rights come under pressure when surveillance logic, symbolic politics and institutional tricks come together.
Anyone who wants a free internet, anyone who wants to protect private communication and anyone who takes democracy seriously should talk about this.
Share this issue. Inform yourself. Look at who voted how. And never forget: freedom rarely disappears all at once. It disappears step by step, often in technical details, often in complicated procedures and often exactly when too few people are watching.
@rata_bursatil_ Macho comparte la mierda que fumas porque (1) ni han presentado “Meta Compute” (ya me dirás de donde sacas el nombre) y (2) la noticia original de Bloomberg comenta que está en pensamiento/desarrollo https://t.co/rltUl1kpbD
@watoulsky@Livertad2017 Ni es un anuncio oficial ni hay un roadmap aún para ello. Son posibles ideas que se están desarrollando actualmente https://t.co/rltUl1kpbD