I'm sorry but when artists go like "my art is better than this AI slop" and then post art that's not like super impressive it's just really embarrassing.
I really want to understand how does this prove his point exactly, he asked for "super impressive" and I gave him my best, the closest thing I made to "super impressive"
Is it super impressive? I don't know, I am the one who made it I can't just say it is
But it's the best of my work, and that is the closest to the benchmark he sat I ever got
Intentionally posting something that isn't made to look impressive or is old as a way of proving it's worth is a completely different thing that I don't disagree with, I just didn't think of it that way when I first saw it is all
@gorgi__ Thank you, I appreciate the compliment but I would still advocate that the effort poured into what you might deem worse than what AI can do deserves the same amount of appreciation, without bad art good art wouldn't exist (we all start somewhere)